Macc v Boreham Wood Highlights

Discussion of footy that ISN'T centred around Darlo!

Moderators: mikkyx, botrash, charlie, uncovered

Post Reply
BaronsCourtQuaker
Posts: 767
Joined: Tue Sep 28, 2010 12:52 pm
Team Supported: Darlington

Macc v Boreham Wood Highlights

Post by BaronsCourtQuaker » Mon Mar 21, 2016 3:58 pm


AndyPark
Posts: 11351
Joined: Sat Jul 25, 2009 3:08 pm
Team Supported: Darlington
Location: Darlington

Re: Macc v Boreham Wood Highlights

Post by AndyPark » Mon Mar 21, 2016 4:34 pm

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
18/19 Season:
LDWDLDLWDLLWWWDDDDLLLLWDWWLWDLLDWDLDLLWLLWW

*includes all cup games*

User avatar
grytters
Posts: 1546
Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 4:45 pm
Team Supported: Darlington
Location: Sheffield

Re: Macc v Boreham Wood Highlights

Post by grytters » Thu Mar 24, 2016 5:03 pm

Thanks BCQ, much appreciated
A hyena dancing on the grave of a lion.

User avatar
Mr_Tibbs
Posts: 3296
Joined: Fri Jul 31, 2009 8:55 pm
Team Supported: The Almighty Darlo
Location: Gruzia
Contact:

Re: Macc v Boreham Wood Highlights

Post by Mr_Tibbs » Thu Mar 24, 2016 5:12 pm

BaronsCourtQuaker wrote:http://www.theguardian.com/football/201 ... reham-wood
The club usually show their match highlights online but apparently felt put out by demands to pay for video of Vanarama National League games, and came up with their own alternative.
I'm wondering now... demands from who? Is this some kind of league ruling which might affect the rights to film and show our own footage of National League games (should we go up, of course)?
Join - Shop - Collect

Collect free donations for your club every time you shop the easyfundraising way:

Image

www.easyfundraising.org.uk/causes/dfcsg

Darlogramps
Posts: 4397
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 10:47 am
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Macc v Boreham Wood Highlights

Post by Darlogramps » Sat Mar 26, 2016 3:58 pm

Mr_Tibbs wrote:
BaronsCourtQuaker wrote:http://www.theguardian.com/football/201 ... reham-wood
The club usually show their match highlights online but apparently felt put out by demands to pay for video of Vanarama National League games, and came up with their own alternative.
I'm wondering now... demands from who? Is this some kind of league ruling which might affect the rights to film and show our own footage of National League games (should we go up, of course)?
It's Boreham Wood themselves who are asking for the money. They're notoriously arsey about this kind of thing.

Chester FC also had a problem earlier in the season: http://www.chesterchronicle.co.uk/sport ... d-10441199
If ever you're bored or miserable:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZlZohZoadGY

User avatar
Mr_Tibbs
Posts: 3296
Joined: Fri Jul 31, 2009 8:55 pm
Team Supported: The Almighty Darlo
Location: Gruzia
Contact:

Re: Macc v Boreham Wood Highlights

Post by Mr_Tibbs » Sun Mar 27, 2016 9:42 am

Darlogramps wrote:
Mr_Tibbs wrote:
BaronsCourtQuaker wrote:http://www.theguardian.com/football/201 ... reham-wood
The club usually show their match highlights online but apparently felt put out by demands to pay for video of Vanarama National League games, and came up with their own alternative.
I'm wondering now... demands from who? Is this some kind of league ruling which might affect the rights to film and show our own footage of National League games (should we go up, of course)?
It's Boreham Wood themselves who are asking for the money. They're notoriously arsey about this kind of thing.

Chester FC also had a problem earlier in the season: http://www.chesterchronicle.co.uk/sport ... d-10441199
The rotters!

Post Reply