Darlo Uncovered

http://www.theguardian.com/football/201 ... reham-wood

No need for Kev's goal cam here.

Thanks BCQ, much appreciated

BaronsCourtQuaker wrote:http://www.theguardian.com/football/201 ... reham-wood

The club usually show their match highlights online but apparently felt put out by demands to pay for video of Vanarama National League games, and came up with their own alternative.

I'm wondering now... demands from who? Is this some kind of league ruling which might affect the rights to film and show our own footage of National League games (should we go up, of course)?

Mr_Tibbs wrote:

BaronsCourtQuaker wrote:http://www.theguardian.com/football/201 ... reham-wood

The club usually show their match highlights online but apparently felt put out by demands to pay for video of Vanarama National League games, and came up with their own alternative.

I'm wondering now... demands from who? Is this some kind of league ruling which might affect the rights to film and show our own footage of National League games (should we go up, of course)?

It's Boreham Wood themselves who are asking for the money. They're notoriously arsey about this kind of thing.

Chester FC also had a problem earlier in the season: http://www.chesterchronicle.co.uk/sport ... d-10441199

Darlogramps wrote:

Mr_Tibbs wrote:

BaronsCourtQuaker wrote:http://www.theguardian.com/football/201 ... reham-wood

The club usually show their match highlights online but apparently felt put out by demands to pay for video of Vanarama National League games, and came up with their own alternative.

I'm wondering now... demands from who? Is this some kind of league ruling which might affect the rights to film and show our own footage of National League games (should we go up, of course)?

It's Boreham Wood themselves who are asking for the money. They're notoriously arsey about this kind of thing.

Chester FC also had a problem earlier in the season: http://www.chesterchronicle.co.uk/sport ... d-10441199

The rotters!