York City v Darlo Match Thread
Re: York City v Darlo Match Thread
There's tonnes of factors. Blackwell still not being the finished deal is a big part I think. More seats and another covered terrace (even that just spans the penalty area due to the pipe) will help immeasurably. Was delighted feedback has been taken into account with the dugouts and its made a big difference on that side. We've got to remember, places like York, people are going to a proper stadium. Blackwell right now, is half a one.
Similarly, some people have just fallen out of the habit. There will be folks who have been to the odd game, and go to the odd away game, but aren't going to home games regularly. I don't think more expensive tickets helps in that regard. I do think 14 is a little steep (and i know it's in line with a lot of the division, but that doesn't make theirs right either). I sort of think 12 is better, the mindset is it being close to a tenner.
Ultimately I hope people begin to come back, enjoy the experience, and come again and again. It being a comfortable experience, with seats for those who want them, so kids can see, covered terrace for crap weather, and a welcoming bar can all help the experience for those who drift, or see it as a day out.
We can win these folks back, it's just going to take time and inevitable improvements to Blackwell that we just don't have the money for yet. The club taking on feedback is promising. We've seen not only the dugouts moved but a food outlet next to the tinshed, more reasonable prices, access to the bar relaxed... and we'll reap the benefits from all of it.
Similarly, some people have just fallen out of the habit. There will be folks who have been to the odd game, and go to the odd away game, but aren't going to home games regularly. I don't think more expensive tickets helps in that regard. I do think 14 is a little steep (and i know it's in line with a lot of the division, but that doesn't make theirs right either). I sort of think 12 is better, the mindset is it being close to a tenner.
Ultimately I hope people begin to come back, enjoy the experience, and come again and again. It being a comfortable experience, with seats for those who want them, so kids can see, covered terrace for crap weather, and a welcoming bar can all help the experience for those who drift, or see it as a day out.
We can win these folks back, it's just going to take time and inevitable improvements to Blackwell that we just don't have the money for yet. The club taking on feedback is promising. We've seen not only the dugouts moved but a food outlet next to the tinshed, more reasonable prices, access to the bar relaxed... and we'll reap the benefits from all of it.
-
- Posts: 960
- Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 10:40 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: York City v Darlo Match Thread
We're debating why people are attending away matches but swerving home matches. Entry price can't be a significant factor. It was £14 at Botham Crescent. Plus there was the additional cost of getting to York.H1987 wrote:There's tonnes of factors. Blackwell still not being the finished deal is a big part I think. More seats and another covered terrace (even that just spans the penalty area due to the pipe) will help immeasurably. Was delighted feedback has been taken into account with the dugouts and its made a big difference on that side. We've got to remember, places like York, people are going to a proper stadium. Blackwell right now, is half a one.
Similarly, some people have just fallen out of the habit. There will be folks who have been to the odd game, and go to the odd away game, but aren't going to home games regularly. I don't think more expensive tickets helps in that regard. I do think 14 is a little steep (and i know it's in line with a lot of the division, but that doesn't make theirs right either). I sort of think 12 is better, the mindset is it being close to a tenner.
Ultimately I hope people begin to come back, enjoy the experience, and come again and again. It being a comfortable experience, with seats for those who want them, so kids can see, covered terrace for crap weather, and a welcoming bar can all help the experience for those who drift, or see it as a day out.
We can win these folks back, it's just going to take time and inevitable improvements to Blackwell that we just don't have the money for yet. The club taking on feedback is promising. We've seen not only the dugouts moved but a food outlet next to the tinshed, more reasonable prices, access to the bar relaxed... and we'll reap the benefits from all of it.
-
- Posts: 293
- Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2012 6:13 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: York City v Darlo Match Thread
Some might not realise it but there are a lot of people living in North Yorkshire who have a historic affinity to Darlington as their local club.
Like me.
This soft spot and affinity goes back years. For some it's as easy to get to York as Darlington. It's probably the same reason why we took so many to Harrogate when we played there.
Latent interest is always aroused by the big games and it was ever thus. It was why we had such massive crowds against Chelsea ,West Ham and Arsenal in the fifties and sixties. And why nearly seventeen thousand of us tried to stuff ourselves in to Feethams for the title decider with Torquay in 1967. That's just how it is.
Last night's match was probably just another example of a perceived "big one".
If I remember rightly. weren't York one of the last teams we played at the Arena when we went bust, and didn't we have Jordan Pickford in goal for us? I'm struggling to remember the score; think it was 2-2.
Good interview with Pickford in last Saturday's daily Mail - fondly remembers playing for us and Alfreton - ironic on a day both teams were playing each other. Now at 30m the most expensive goalkeeper. Hope he gets an England call up.
Like me.
This soft spot and affinity goes back years. For some it's as easy to get to York as Darlington. It's probably the same reason why we took so many to Harrogate when we played there.
Latent interest is always aroused by the big games and it was ever thus. It was why we had such massive crowds against Chelsea ,West Ham and Arsenal in the fifties and sixties. And why nearly seventeen thousand of us tried to stuff ourselves in to Feethams for the title decider with Torquay in 1967. That's just how it is.
Last night's match was probably just another example of a perceived "big one".
If I remember rightly. weren't York one of the last teams we played at the Arena when we went bust, and didn't we have Jordan Pickford in goal for us? I'm struggling to remember the score; think it was 2-2.
Good interview with Pickford in last Saturday's daily Mail - fondly remembers playing for us and Alfreton - ironic on a day both teams were playing each other. Now at 30m the most expensive goalkeeper. Hope he gets an England call up.
- HarrytheQuaker
- Posts: 3148
- Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 3:57 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: York City v Darlo Match Thread
True... Don't make it right but we do need a raised section to help the viewm62exile wrote:Everybody did though!HarrytheQuaker wrote:Weren't allowed to stand on the bank at Bishop.. So why at BMEmdubya wrote:If last Saturdays "grass bank grandstand " behind the bottom goal is allowed to continue it should make things a bit better until we have a proper solution.loan_star wrote:Until they are able to do something about sightlines down the sides and open end people will always be put off as theyll spend the match looking at the back of someones head.
Admittedly the club house side is a vast improvement now but still a nightmare if theres a big crowd.
-
- Posts: 14111
- Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 10:13 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: York City v Darlo Match Thread
I ask plenty of people if they prefer BM or HP, nearly always including me, say they preferred when we played at HP.HarrytheQuaker wrote:I'm glad I'm not the only one..shawry wrote:I go to the home games, have a season ticket, but truth be told I hate it there, with a passion it still feels less of a home than Bishop ever did
Sent from my SM-G955F using Tapatalk
-
- Posts: 771
- Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2014 12:13 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: York City v Darlo Match Thread
OK Pete..I have to ask the question.Darlo_Pete wrote:I ask plenty of people if they prefer BM or HP, nearly always including me, say they preferred when we played at HP.HarrytheQuaker wrote:I'm glad I'm not the only one..shawry wrote:I go to the home games, have a season ticket, but truth be told I hate it there, with a passion it still feels less of a home than Bishop ever did
Sent from my SM-G955F using Tapatalk
Why do you prefer HP to BM.
Re: York City v Darlo Match Thread
I have to ask the question. When you conduct these survey why do you nearly always ask yourself the question? Surely you already know your own opinion?Darlo_Pete wrote:I ask plenty of people if they prefer BM or HP, nearly always including me, say they preferred when we played at HP.HarrytheQuaker wrote:I'm glad I'm not the only one..shawry wrote:I go to the home games, have a season ticket, but truth be told I hate it there, with a passion it still feels less of a home than Bishop ever did
Sent from my SM-G955F using Tapatalk
-
- Posts: 14111
- Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 10:13 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: York City v Darlo Match Thread
Hard to put my finger on it, I just preferred the matchday experience more at HP.My opinion wrote:OK Pete..I have to ask the question.Darlo_Pete wrote:I ask plenty of people if they prefer BM or HP, nearly always including me, say they preferred when we played at HP.HarrytheQuaker wrote:I'm glad I'm not the only one..shawry wrote:I go to the home games, have a season ticket, but truth be told I hate it there, with a passion it still feels less of a home than Bishop ever did
Sent from my SM-G955F using Tapatalk
Why do you prefer HP to BM.
Re: York City v Darlo Match Thread
Time 5 foot eight and I found it very hard to see at the Gainsborough match.the main difference between Blackwell and bishop is the bank.i know we shouldn't of used it but we did.desperaely need terracing in my opinion
-
- Posts: 6025
- Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 10:47 am
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: York City v Darlo Match Thread
But how do we fund that? Primarily through getting fans through the door. So it's a catch 22.Sleethy wrote:Time 5 foot eight and I found it very hard to see at the Gainsborough match.the main difference between Blackwell and bishop is the bank.i know we shouldn't of used it but we did.desperaely need terracing in my opinion
Oh and a sensibly-sized playing budget would help
Re: York City v Darlo Match Thread
Sensibly sized human beings would help!Darlogramps wrote:But how do we fund that? Primarily through getting fans through the door. So it's a catch 22.Sleethy wrote:Time 5 foot eight and I found it very hard to see at the Gainsborough match.the main difference between Blackwell and bishop is the bank.i know we shouldn't of used it but we did.desperaely need terracing in my opinion
Oh and a sensibly-sized playing budget would help
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
On Sunday April 29, 2012 at 10:25 pm, Darlo Cockney wrote:Sadly some people have nothing better to do that invent rumours.
We will be playing at the arena again next season - fact.
Quakerz - if you actually attended games and spoke to people you might actually find our facts, rather than spreading s*** on this board.
DC
-
- Posts: 1023
- Joined: Thu Sep 24, 2009 8:06 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: York City v Darlo Match Thread
Could we not have rows of boxes, steadily increasing in height, placed in the open end, or benches, like for old school photos?
- theoriginalfatcat
- Posts: 6775
- Joined: Wed Jul 15, 2009 7:40 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: York City v Darlo Match Thread
Darlo_Pete wrote:Hard to put my finger on it, I just preferred the matchday experience more at HP.
At Bishop you had that small ground feeling with the advantage that you could get close to the action and/or get a bit of height.
At B.M you can't get as close, and you can't really get any height. It's early days but our ground at present isn't that good for watching football - this is the dreaded "matchday experience" that Pete and others go on about.
I hope that given time our new home will gradually improve.
Profile pic
Feethams the Panda. 28 Jan 2012.
Now extinct!
Feethams the Panda. 28 Jan 2012.
Now extinct!
-
- Posts: 2844
- Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 8:43 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: York City v Darlo Match Thread
I feel the same, it is vital that somehow we get more terracing installed as you will never say that BM can hold 3000.Anything above 2000 and it is impossible to see around the flat terracing.I would imagine the clubhouse side also will not be altered for better viewing purposes.These are the areas that will hold us back particularly the big local derbies but hopefully we have future plans in place subject to funding of course.theoriginalfatcat wrote:Darlo_Pete wrote:Hard to put my finger on it, I just preferred the matchday experience more at HP.
At Bishop you had that small ground feeling with the advantage that you could get close to the action and/or get a bit of height.
At B.M you can't get as close, and you can't really get any height. It's early days but our ground at present isn't that good for watching football - this is the dreaded "matchday experience" that Pete and others go on about.
I hope that given time our new home will gradually improve.
Sent from my XT1032 using Tapatalk
Re: York City v Darlo Match Thread
We need terrace at the open end obviously. I think it will need to be 12 steps at least otherwise we won't hit the 4,000 capacity.
But I think we could also do with terrace from the tin shed to the edge of the penalty box, on both sides, as well. Like we used to have at Feethams when the old west and east stands were in place.
Just an 8 step terrace either side - so it matches the tin shed terrace - would give vital better extra vantage points for some of those who like to stand down the sides, and would increase capacity by a further 3 or 400.
But I think we could also do with terrace from the tin shed to the edge of the penalty box, on both sides, as well. Like we used to have at Feethams when the old west and east stands were in place.
Just an 8 step terrace either side - so it matches the tin shed terrace - would give vital better extra vantage points for some of those who like to stand down the sides, and would increase capacity by a further 3 or 400.
-
- Posts: 2844
- Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 8:43 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: York City v Darlo Match Thread
Spot on Quakerz, if we manage that we will have a nice looking ground.Quakerz wrote:We need terrace at the open end obviously. I think it will need to be 12 steps at least otherwise we won't hit the 4,000 capacity.
But I think we could also do with terrace from the tin shed to the edge of the penalty box, on both sides, as well. Like we used to have at Feethams when the old west and east stands were in place.
Just an 8 step terrace either side - so it matches the tin shed terrace - would give vital better extra vantage points for some of those who like to stand down the sides, and would increase capacity by a further 3 or 400.
Sent from my XT1032 using Tapatalk
Re: York City v Darlo Match Thread
And where is the money coming from ?QUAKERMAN2 wrote:Spot on Quakerz, if we manage that we will have a nice looking ground.Quakerz wrote:We need terrace at the open end obviously. I think it will need to be 12 steps at least otherwise we won't hit the 4,000 capacity.
But I think we could also do with terrace from the tin shed to the edge of the penalty box, on both sides, as well. Like we used to have at Feethams when the old west and east stands were in place.
Just an 8 step terrace either side - so it matches the tin shed terrace - would give vital better extra vantage points for some of those who like to stand down the sides, and would increase capacity by a further 3 or 400.
Sent from my XT1032 using Tapatalk
Funding for the stand has stalled, unless of course Gray decides he has more than enough of a budget and the " Boost the Budget" fund can go towards the stand.
Can't see that happening.
Those in charge of our club do seem very relaxed about the situation, and I wonder if we are going to be faced with a 'fait accompli' whereby we will be in a position to challenge for promotion, not have the funds to complete the building work neccessary for promotion, and an outside investor will suddenly appear.
It would not suprise me if Singh was to reappear. Do not think he will be repelled a second time around.
-
- Posts: 2084
- Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2009 12:23 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: York City v Darlo Match Thread
an interesting theory - or perhaps Singh / whoever may wait to see if we end up in a similar pickle but needing funds to enable us to complete promotion back to the promised land - i.e. the Football League. I think the return to football league status would test people's resolve far more than another step up the non league ladder....banktopp wrote:And where is the money coming from ?QUAKERMAN2 wrote:Spot on Quakerz, if we manage that we will have a nice looking ground.Quakerz wrote:We need terrace at the open end obviously. I think it will need to be 12 steps at least otherwise we won't hit the 4,000 capacity.
But I think we could also do with terrace from the tin shed to the edge of the penalty box, on both sides, as well. Like we used to have at Feethams when the old west and east stands were in place.
Just an 8 step terrace either side - so it matches the tin shed terrace - would give vital better extra vantage points for some of those who like to stand down the sides, and would increase capacity by a further 3 or 400.
Sent from my XT1032 using Tapatalk
Funding for the stand has stalled, unless of course Gray decides he has more than enough of a budget and the " Boost the Budget" fund can go towards the stand.
Can't see that happening.
Those in charge of our club do seem very relaxed about the situation, and I wonder if we are going to be faced with a 'fait accompli' whereby we will be in a position to challenge for promotion, not have the funds to complete the building work neccessary for promotion, and an outside investor will suddenly appear.
It would not suprise me if Singh was to reappear. Do not think he will be repelled a second time around.
Re: York City v Darlo Match Thread
If our ceiling is this level because of the ground then that is our ceiling. I'd be in support of reducing the playing budget to a mid-table level and additional funds being used for ground development. I know that isn't a particularly popular suggestion though.
Re: York City v Darlo Match Thread
As I said on another thread, the club doesnt seem to be sounding any alarm bells about raising money for the extra seats. Why not? To me that speaks volumes that something is going on behind the scenes that isnt public knowledge. And before any asks, this is just me theorising, I dont have any inside info!
-
- Posts: 2844
- Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 8:43 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: York City v Darlo Match Thread
Let's see what David Johnson has to say in his programme notes tomorrow.loan_star wrote:As I said on another thread, the club doesnt seem to be sounding any alarm bells about raising money for the extra seats. Why not? To me that speaks volumes that something is going on behind the scenes that isnt public knowledge. And before any asks, this is just me theorising, I dont have any inside info!
Sent from my XT1032 using Tapatalk
-
- Posts: 6010
- Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2012 8:41 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: York City v Darlo Match Thread
Season started and currently a month and half to raise 40k to get to the next step, club focus needs to be on hitting this.
I think Divas advised DFCSG will be putting a chunk of the renewals into this pot, hope this would be at least 10k which reduces us down to 30k required. This is still quite a challenge though and as others have said we need to push this.
I think Divas advised DFCSG will be putting a chunk of the renewals into this pot, hope this would be at least 10k which reduces us down to 30k required. This is still quite a challenge though and as others have said we need to push this.
Re: York City v Darlo Match Thread
sometimes it just needs a spark. A few times when we've been watching the totaliser the momentum has just picked up and everyone was tweeting and talking about it.
Just need that spark
Just need that spark
- theoriginalfatcat
- Posts: 6775
- Joined: Wed Jul 15, 2009 7:40 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: York City v Darlo Match Thread
It would surprise me.banktopp wrote:It would not suprise me if Singh was to reappear. Do not think he will be repelled a second time around.
Everything about that situation was strange, and he bottled out of even attempting to explain himself. And because you've mentioned Singh - it's worth reminding ourselves of his parting shot. I don't have to search very far, as our learned friend Quakerz has it above ....
“Everybody knows where that club is going now, so I’m out of the way. They can carry on, it’s their club, they can keep it." - Raj Singh, 2017
Not the kind of thing anyone would say if they had any kind of genuine interest in the club, or us, its owners.
We've had a great start to this season - we don't need Singh, we don't need his money and we definitely don't need the club splitting controversy and grief that any reemergence would undoubtably bring.
Profile pic
Feethams the Panda. 28 Jan 2012.
Now extinct!
Feethams the Panda. 28 Jan 2012.
Now extinct!
- Mr_Tibbs
- Posts: 3293
- Joined: Fri Jul 31, 2009 8:55 pm
- Team Supported: The Almighty Darlo
- Location: Gruzia
- Contact:
Re: York City v Darlo Match Thread
Yep.D_F_C wrote:sometimes it just needs a spark. A few times when we've been watching the totaliser the momentum has just picked up and everyone was tweeting and talking about it.
Just need that spark
Re: York City v Darlo Match Thread
Why not categorise the forthcoming Spennymoor game as a Cat A like the Premier League then charge them £20? If their claimed 1000 fans turn up, then there is £20k to spend...
Re: York City v Darlo Match Thread
Quite agree we don't need Singh, but what could be more bizarre than him turning up last season trying to take over.theoriginalfatcat wrote:It would surprise me.banktopp wrote:It would not suprise me if Singh was to reappear. Do not think he will be repelled a second time around.
Everything about that situation was strange, and he bottled out of even attempting to explain himself. And because you've mentioned Singh - it's worth reminding ourselves of his parting shot. I don't have to search very far, as our learned friend Quakerz has it above ....
“Everybody knows where that club is going now, so I’m out of the way. They can carry on, it’s their club, they can keep it." - Raj Singh, 2017
Not the kind of thing anyone would say if they had any kind of genuine interest in the club, or us, its owners.
We've had a great start to this season - we don't need Singh, we don't need his money and we definitely don't need the club splitting controversy and grief that any reemergence would undoubtably bring.
Re: York City v Darlo Match Thread
Exactly what I suggested back in May.banktopp wrote:And where is the money coming from ?QUAKERMAN2 wrote:Spot on Quakerz, if we manage that we will have a nice looking ground.Quakerz wrote:We need terrace at the open end obviously. I think it will need to be 12 steps at least otherwise we won't hit the 4,000 capacity.
But I think we could also do with terrace from the tin shed to the edge of the penalty box, on both sides, as well. Like we used to have at Feethams when the old west and east stands were in place.
Just an 8 step terrace either side - so it matches the tin shed terrace - would give vital better extra vantage points for some of those who like to stand down the sides, and would increase capacity by a further 3 or 400.
Sent from my XT1032 using Tapatalk
Funding for the stand has stalled, unless of course Gray decides he has more than enough of a budget and the " Boost the Budget" fund can go towards the stand.
Can't see that happening.
Those in charge of our club do seem very relaxed about the situation, and I wonder if we are going to be faced with a 'fait accompli' whereby we will be in a position to challenge for promotion, not have the funds to complete the building work neccessary for promotion, and an outside investor will suddenly appear.
It would not suprise me if Singh was to reappear. Do not think he will be repelled a second time around.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
On Sunday April 29, 2012 at 10:25 pm, Darlo Cockney wrote:Sadly some people have nothing better to do that invent rumours.
We will be playing at the arena again next season - fact.
Quakerz - if you actually attended games and spoke to people you might actually find our facts, rather than spreading s*** on this board.
DC
Re: York City v Darlo Match Thread
It's popular with those of us that see beyond the end of the current season, but you get called boring for suggesting it.lo36789 wrote:If our ceiling is this level because of the ground then that is our ceiling. I'd be in support of reducing the playing budget to a mid-table level and additional funds being used for ground development. I know that isn't a particularly popular suggestion though.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
On Sunday April 29, 2012 at 10:25 pm, Darlo Cockney wrote:Sadly some people have nothing better to do that invent rumours.
We will be playing at the arena again next season - fact.
Quakerz - if you actually attended games and spoke to people you might actually find our facts, rather than spreading s*** on this board.
DC
-
- Posts: 4127
- Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2011 2:14 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington/Blackburn
Re: York City v Darlo Match Thread
Collins should have gone. Fair point.Darlo_Pete wrote:We were lucky not to lose Collins in the first half, as it looked like he was the last player when he brought down their forward.