Singh's wages ultimatum = emotional blackmail
-
- Posts: 904
- Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2009 5:31 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
Singh's wages ultimatum = emotional blackmail
To threaten to put the club into administration (effectively killing the club as we will be kicked out of the Conference) if the players and Cooper/Dryden do not accept reduced terms is nothing but emotional blackmail.
I understand that Singh needs to reduce costs, but this isn't on and no doubt the players/Cooper/Dryden who don't have the emotional attachment to the club we fans have will tell him where to stick his ultimatum.
I am beginning to feel the same way about Singh as I do about Houghton
I understand that Singh needs to reduce costs, but this isn't on and no doubt the players/Cooper/Dryden who don't have the emotional attachment to the club we fans have will tell him where to stick his ultimatum.
I am beginning to feel the same way about Singh as I do about Houghton
Re: Singh's wages ultimatum = emotional blackmail
I know everyone is entitled to there opinion, mine is you're an idiot for even mentioning Houghton in the same breath as Singh.
Re: Singh's wages ultimatum = emotional blackmail
There comes a point where every other way is tried. Singh is rightly at the end of his tether and you have a go at him about it? Rob is right, to use Houghtons name in the same context is wrong.
Re: Singh's wages ultimatum = emotional blackmail
Bloody idiot - Raj is spot on. Those lazy gets deserve a wage drop after their performances recently. Today was better in first half but again the lazt gets returned to type in second half. Well done Raj.Charlie_Darlo wrote:To threaten to put the club into administration (effectively killing the club as we will be kicked out of the Conference) if the players and Cooper/Dryden do not accept reduced terms is nothing but emotional blackmail.
I understand that Singh needs to reduce costs, but this isn't on and no doubt the players/Cooper/Dryden who don't have the emotional attachment to the club we fans have will tell him where to stick his ultimatum.
I am beginning to feel the same way about Singh as I do about Houghton
Quakerian
Re: Singh's wages ultimatum = emotional blackmail
Emotional blackmail for who exactly? You've said yourself the players don't have an emotional attachment to the club, so how can he emotionally blackmail them?Charlie_Darlo wrote:To threaten to put the club into administration (effectively killing the club as we will be kicked out of the Conference) if the players and Cooper/Dryden do not accept reduced terms is nothing but emotional blackmail.
I understand that Singh needs to reduce costs, but this isn't on and no doubt the players/Cooper/Dryden who don't have the emotional attachment to the club we fans have will tell him where to stick his ultimatum.
I am beginning to feel the same way about Singh as I do about Houghton
Singh has piled his own money into keeping the club afloat for the last 2 years or so. Houghton spent money that didn't exist, racking up debt against the club. There's a huge difference.
On Sunday April 29, 2012 at 10:25 pm, Darlo Cockney wrote:Sadly some people have nothing better to do that invent rumours.
We will be playing at the arena again next season - fact.
Quakerz - if you actually attended games and spoke to people you might actually find our facts, rather than spreading s*** on this board.
DC
Re: Singh's wages ultimatum = emotional blackmail
Agreed with comments above, this is a shocking thing to say. Houghton was pure poison with no intention of running this club sustainably.Charlie_Darlo wrote:
I am beginning to feel the same way about Singh as I do about Houghton
Singh is working hard to find solutions and is battling against a lot of the issues that Houghton brought about.
-
- Posts: 2459
- Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2009 9:30 am
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: Singh's wages ultimatum = emotional blackmail
you clown, that is a disgusting smear on a bloke that has bent over backwards for this club.Charlie_Darlo wrote: I am beginning to feel the same way about Singh as I do about Houghton
Instead of being critical of him you should be supporting his efforts to bring these issues to a head and keep us informed of events.
Forewarned is forearmed
click on Facebook PIMM Productions for the latest on Darlo Till I Die
Re: Singh's wages ultimatum = emotional blackmail
I recall Charlie didnt want DFC to survive in the last admin, prefering the phoenix option. Kind of sets him up as someone thats never wanted Singh in charge so his views are no suprise really.
-
- Posts: 904
- Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2009 5:31 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: Singh's wages ultimatum = emotional blackmail
So, if the players and Cooper/Dryden don't play ball and Singh calls in the administrators, you will all be happy he did the right thing?
Another thing, if the club is close to administration, it must have significant debt despite Singh's support.
Maybe the Houghton comparison was a tad harsh for now, but I stand by the rest.
Another thing, if the club is close to administration, it must have significant debt despite Singh's support.
Maybe the Houghton comparison was a tad harsh for now, but I stand by the rest.
- Christophano
- Posts: 1841
- Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2009 7:50 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: Singh's wages ultimatum = emotional blackmail
Charlie is badmouthing Raj?
Situation normal.
Situation normal.
Re: Singh's wages ultimatum = emotional blackmail
Why don't you find a bottomless pit & keep chucking your money down it for a few years & see how quickly you get fed up. I think that Raj made very fair points in his interview, and at the end of the day he employs staff (ie footballers) who are not performing, then he has every right to be annoyed about it, and to want to put an end to his losses.Charlie_Darlo wrote:To threaten to put the club into administration (effectively killing the club as we will be kicked out of the Conference) if the players and Cooper/Dryden do not accept reduced terms is nothing but emotional blackmail.
I understand that Singh needs to reduce costs, but this isn't on and no doubt the players/Cooper/Dryden who don't have the emotional attachment to the club we fans have will tell him where to stick his ultimatum.
I am beginning to feel the same way about Singh as I do about Houghton
-
- Posts: 904
- Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2009 5:31 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: Singh's wages ultimatum = emotional blackmail
I do understand Singh's need to cut costs if you read my original post. My point is he is going about it in the wrong way.littlecar wrote:Why don't you find a bottomless pit & keep chucking your money down it for a few years & see how quickly you get fed up. I think that Raj made very fair points in his interview, and at the end of the day he employs staff (ie footballers) who are not performing, then he has every right to be annoyed about it, and to want to put an end to his losses.Charlie_Darlo wrote:To threaten to put the club into administration (effectively killing the club as we will be kicked out of the Conference) if the players and Cooper/Dryden do not accept reduced terms is nothing but emotional blackmail.
I understand that Singh needs to reduce costs, but this isn't on and no doubt the players/Cooper/Dryden who don't have the emotional attachment to the club we fans have will tell him where to stick his ultimatum.
I am beginning to feel the same way about Singh as I do about Houghton
Re: Singh's wages ultimatum = emotional blackmail
Houghton comment: Ridiculous, unfair, damaging and disgraceful. You've lost any right to be taken seriously.
Re: Singh's wages ultimatum = emotional blackmail
Huge over-reaction to the original post, as usual. Nevertheless, the truth is that Singh does not have a leg to stand on with regard to the players wages, the money owed to Cooper, or the council covenants. I'd say its more a cry for help than emotional blackmail.
-
- Posts: 1204
- Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 11:18 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: Singh's wages ultimatum = emotional blackmail
If we take him at his word, Singh is the opposite of Houghton. We are not racking up debts, he is the one losing cash and he has been very good at keeping fans in the picture.mobi wrote:Huge over-reaction to the original post, as usual. Nevertheless, the truth is that Singh does not have a leg to stand on with regard to the players wages, the money owed to Cooper, or the council covenants. I'd say its more a cry for help than emotional blackmail.
However the way he talks in today's programme you would think he left Cooper with his credit card for the weekend and came back to find he had gone nuts with it. Singh signed off on all of the deals that he now objects to and says we can't afford.
Its looking like it was s*** or bust.
-
- Posts: 2803
- Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2009 7:54 am
- Team Supported: Darlington
- Location: A Swimming Pool (usually).
Re: Singh's wages ultimatum = emotional blackmail
Charlie_Darlo wrote:To threaten to put the club into administration (effectively killing the club as we will be kicked out of the Conference) if the players and Cooper/Dryden do not accept reduced terms is nothing but emotional blackmail.
I understand that Singh needs to reduce costs, but this isn't on and no doubt the players/Cooper/Dryden who don't have the emotional attachment to the club we fans have will tell him where to stick his ultimatum.
I am beginning to feel the same way about Singh as I do about Houghton
I think Raj can't be trusted, he'll try and put us in Admin before the year out!
Last edited by comeondarlo on Fri Dec 30, 2011 8:42 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Singh's wages ultimatum = emotional blackmail
I don't necessarily agree with how it has been done or whether it is the right thing to do but I certainly sympathise and think Raj is within his rights.
Everybody seems to think that football should be treated completely different to the rest of the world. Football hasn't been immune to the recession and people up and down the country have been asked to take a wage cut to keep their jobs and avoid job cuts, even if they have contracts - why should footballers be different?
I don't think they are being punished for poor performance they are being asked to share the pain. Raj set a budget for a competitive team which will have factored in minimum expectations like FA cup revenue. The team have hardly been competitive and now we have to review. When any organisation loses a source of revenue and a bleak financial future they review their spending.
It seems the only choice we have is for Raj to keep absorbing the losses or wind the club up because the playing staff think they are immune to wage cuts because "they have a contract".
Everybody seems to think that football should be treated completely different to the rest of the world. Football hasn't been immune to the recession and people up and down the country have been asked to take a wage cut to keep their jobs and avoid job cuts, even if they have contracts - why should footballers be different?
I don't think they are being punished for poor performance they are being asked to share the pain. Raj set a budget for a competitive team which will have factored in minimum expectations like FA cup revenue. The team have hardly been competitive and now we have to review. When any organisation loses a source of revenue and a bleak financial future they review their spending.
It seems the only choice we have is for Raj to keep absorbing the losses or wind the club up because the playing staff think they are immune to wage cuts because "they have a contract".
- QuakerPete
- Posts: 1196
- Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 11:51 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: Singh's wages ultimatum = emotional blackmail
I could agree with you only if it had been done behind the scenes in a genuine manner, not in a throw the toys out of the pram kind of way. An owner of any business has every right to try to contain and reduce costs . . . funny way of going about it though.Ash wrote:I don't necessarily agree with how it has been done or whether it is the right thing to do but I certainly sympathise and think Raj is within his rights.
Everybody seems to think that football should be treated completely different to the rest of the world. Football hasn't been immune to the recession and people up and down the country have been asked to take a wage cut to keep their jobs and avoid job cuts, even if they have contracts - why should footballers be different?
I don't think they are being punished for poor performance they are being asked to share the pain. Raj set a budget for a competitive team which will have factored in minimum expectations like FA cup revenue. The team have hardly been competitive and now we have to review. When any organisation loses a source of revenue and a bleak financial future they review their spending.
It seems the only choice we have is for Raj to keep absorbing the losses or wind the club up because the playing staff think they are immune to wage cuts because "they have a contract".
Re: Singh's wages ultimatum = emotional blackmail
Like Raj says, if a striker was on 20 goals already he's be knocking on the door asking for an improved contract........
Works both ways in my view!
Works both ways in my view!
Re: Singh's wages ultimatum = emotional blackmail
Raj is a businessman first and foremost. He is not going to carry on subsiding an unsustainable business.
With that in mind, I do wonder why he got involved in the first place. He's not a Darlo fan, so didn't do it out of love for the club. He must have looked at it as a business opportunity and a chance to get his hands on the land, and it's not worked out for him. He is going to cut his losses soon enough, and I don't see anyone else willing (or foolish enough) to take over the club.
With that in mind, I do wonder why he got involved in the first place. He's not a Darlo fan, so didn't do it out of love for the club. He must have looked at it as a business opportunity and a chance to get his hands on the land, and it's not worked out for him. He is going to cut his losses soon enough, and I don't see anyone else willing (or foolish enough) to take over the club.
Never argue with an idiot: The best possible outcome is that you win an argument with an idiot.
- QuakerPete
- Posts: 1196
- Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 11:51 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: Singh's wages ultimatum = emotional blackmail
No problem either way with the concept . . . just the methodology. I don't believe the actions of the last few days have added anything positive to the club.loan_star wrote:Like Raj says, if a striker was on 20 goals already he's be knocking on the door asking for an improved contract........
Works both ways in my view!
-
- Posts: 2459
- Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2009 9:30 am
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: Singh's wages ultimatum = emotional blackmail
To be fair Pete the players were Twittering it within hours and the press/Craig had got wind...nothing stays behind closed doors in football(any sport) these days.QuakerPete wrote:Ash wrote: I could agree with you only if it had been done behind the scenes in a genuine manner
click on Facebook PIMM Productions for the latest on Darlo Till I Die
-
- Posts: 4284
- Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2009 8:36 am
- Team Supported: Darlington
- Location: London
Re: Singh's wages ultimatum = emotional blackmail
Charlie darlo appears to suffer from massive learning difficulties and and should therefore be ignored.
- wylam_rangers
- Posts: 4249
- Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2009 12:13 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
- Location: North Riding of Yorkshire
Re: Re: Singh's wages ultimatum = emotional blackmail
I think that anything that leads to performance style bonuses can only be good. Pay them a basic then bonuses according to league position.QuakerPete wrote:No problem either way with the concept . . . just the methodology. I don't believe the actions of the last few days have added anything positive to the club.loan_star wrote:Like Raj says, if a striker was on 20 goals already he's be knocking on the door asking for an improved contract........
Works both ways in my view!
Sent from my HTC Desire using Tapatalk
Re: Singh's wages ultimatum = emotional blackmail
I think this thread is doing more harm than good with it's title displayed on the main page. Raj would be really pleased with it if he read it I'm sure.
-
- Posts: 904
- Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2009 5:31 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: Singh's wages ultimatum = emotional blackmail
It would be easy for me to exchange insults with people on here but that would be cheap and immature.Jazz Maverick wrote:Charlie darlo appears to suffer from massive learning difficulties and and should therefore be ignored.
People can say what they like about me (I'm very thick skinned) and did when I first started to express my doubts about the last regime (I was 100% right on that) but I will continue to post my views.
Most of you are too blinkered about the situation (Singh is god-like to many like Hodgson was) and fail to see the bigger picture.
Re: Singh's wages ultimatum = emotional blackmail
Unlike your anti Houghton rants during the last Admin, including posting his address on the previous incarnation of this message board, slagging off people who criticised you for doing it and challenging Uncovered to ban you for it.Charlie_Darlo wrote:It would be easy for me to exchange insults with people on here but that would be cheap and immature.Jazz Maverick wrote:Charlie darlo appears to suffer from massive learning difficulties and and should therefore be ignored.
People can say what they like about me (I'm very thick skinned) and did when I first started to express my doubts about the last regime (I was 100% right on that) but I will continue to post my views.
Most of you are too blinkered about the situation (Singh is god-like to many like Hodgson was) and fail to see the bigger picture.
-
- Posts: 904
- Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2009 5:31 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: Singh's wages ultimatum = emotional blackmail
Houghton needed some comeback for what he did to the club. The situation we are in now is a hangover from his days. And for the record, I won't be posting Raj Singh's address on here no matter what. I'm sure most people know where he lives and very nice it is too.OHDFC wrote:Unlike your anti Houghton rants during the last Admin, including posting his address on the previous incarnation of this message board, slagging off people who criticised you for doing it and challenging Uncovered to ban you for it.Charlie_Darlo wrote:It would be easy for me to exchange insults with people on here but that would be cheap and immature.Jazz Maverick wrote:Charlie darlo appears to suffer from massive learning difficulties and and should therefore be ignored.
People can say what they like about me (I'm very thick skinned) and did when I first started to express my doubts about the last regime (I was 100% right on that) but I will continue to post my views.
Most of you are too blinkered about the situation (Singh is god-like to many like Hodgson was) and fail to see the bigger picture.
Re: Singh's wages ultimatum = emotional blackmail
I think Raj is doing his best, as did Houghton and Reynolds. The only one I ever doubted was Reg Brealey.fat tony wrote:Agreed with comments above, this is a shocking thing to say. Houghton was pure poison with no intention of running this club sustainably.Charlie_Darlo wrote:
I am beginning to feel the same way about Singh as I do about Houghton
Singh is working hard to find solutions and is battling against a lot of the issues that Houghton brought about.
Its this mentality of turning on chairman that convinces me that the last thing Ill do with my £300m lottery win (when it comes (if I ever buy a ticket)) is buy this club cause the fans turn on you in the end.
-
- Posts: 165
- Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2010 10:43 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: Singh's wages ultimatum = emotional blackmail
Jazz Maverick wrote:Charlie darlo appears to suffer from massive learning difficulties and and should therefore be ignored.
What do you get out of that? It's offensive, school bully tripe. You should give your head a shake my friend.