Same old question - Nathan Fisher

Open now for discussion of all things Darlo!

Moderators: mikkyx, uncovered

Post Reply
super_les_mcjannet
Posts: 6009
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2012 8:41 pm
Team Supported: Darlington

Same old question - Nathan Fisher

Post by super_les_mcjannet » Fri Aug 30, 2013 10:43 am

Heading back to the UK in September, looking for a club.

No plans to head back out to Thailand, do we need more fire power and can we afford him. He might get a full-time contract somwehere anyhow.

Darlogramps
Posts: 6025
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 10:47 am
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Same old question - Nathan Fisher

Post by Darlogramps » Fri Aug 30, 2013 11:02 am

No need for him now we have Johnson.

Doubtless we'll be linked with him again at the end of this season. I think he's the new Paul Connor.
Last edited by Darlogramps on Fri Aug 30, 2013 11:04 am, edited 1 time in total.
If ever you're bored or miserable:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZlZohZoadGY

lo36789
Posts: 10980
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2011 10:58 pm
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Same old question - Nathan Fisher

Post by lo36789 » Fri Aug 30, 2013 11:03 am

my bet is that Nathan Fisher will end up at Celtic Nation.

User avatar
MaddosMilkman
Posts: 465
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 3:07 pm
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Same old question - Nathan Fisher

Post by MaddosMilkman » Fri Aug 30, 2013 12:10 pm

As others have said, I don't think we really need another striker. Our current lot are more than good enough to fire us to promotion.

Neil_Heaneys_Pace
Posts: 379
Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2011 2:14 pm
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Same old question - Nathan Fisher

Post by Neil_Heaneys_Pace » Fri Aug 30, 2013 2:38 pm

clearly any money left in the budget should be used for a defender now or to strengthen during the season when the injury's hit

Darlofan97
Posts: 5722
Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2010 1:44 pm
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Same old question - Nathan Fisher

Post by Darlofan97 » Sat Sep 21, 2013 7:39 pm

At our game today...

super_les_mcjannet
Posts: 6009
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2012 8:41 pm
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Same old question - Nathan Fisher

Post by super_les_mcjannet » Sat Sep 21, 2013 7:43 pm

Darlofan97 wrote:At our game today...
Seen a tweet that he was at a game didn't realise it was ours. He wants to sign for someone in the NE and we all know Gray wanted him.

I might be wrong but it seems our squad is probably at it's budget maximum and Gray is having to move players on to make any room.

Darlofan97
Posts: 5722
Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2010 1:44 pm
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Same old question - Nathan Fisher

Post by Darlofan97 » Sat Sep 21, 2013 7:47 pm

super_les_mcjannet wrote:
Darlofan97 wrote:At our game today...
I might be wrong but it seems our squad is probably at it's budget maximum and Gray is having to move players on to make any room.
I'd say that is a fair assessment to be honest.

Can't really see who can go out and make room and/or if we are actually interested. Maybe this is the frustration from Gray you alluded to in another thread?

super_les_mcjannet
Posts: 6009
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2012 8:41 pm
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Same old question - Nathan Fisher

Post by super_les_mcjannet » Sat Sep 21, 2013 7:51 pm

Darlofan97 wrote:
super_les_mcjannet wrote:
Darlofan97 wrote:At our game today...
I might be wrong but it seems our squad is probably at it's budget maximum and Gray is having to move players on to make any room.
I'd say that is a fair assessment to be honest.

Can't really see who can go out and make room and/or if we are actually interested. Maybe this is the frustration from Gray you alluded to in another thread?
I just get that feeling that we can't sign players unless moving some on at the moment. Which is hard but probably a good thing if we are actually sticking to a budget and making sure we are financially stable.

Any idea where Turns was today?

Ingleby
Posts: 1512
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 7:08 pm
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Same old question - Nathan Fisher

Post by Ingleby » Sat Sep 21, 2013 8:04 pm

I hope this is not in replacement of AJ. Andy was gutted being pulled off today and I can understand why.

Dowson can put in a shift but he's never going to be prolific like Johnson. Meanwhile Amar had a stinker.
For you to insult me, I must first value your opinion.

al_quaker
Posts: 5943
Joined: Sat Jul 11, 2009 2:51 pm
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Same old question - Nathan Fisher

Post by al_quaker » Sat Sep 21, 2013 8:21 pm

Johnson wasn't in the game second half, Purewal is our striker who deals with the high ball best, and Dowson and Purewal had a very good partnership last season. That would be why Johnson got taken off.

Ingleby
Posts: 1512
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 7:08 pm
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Same old question - Nathan Fisher

Post by Ingleby » Sat Sep 21, 2013 8:29 pm

al_quaker wrote:Johnson wasn't in the game second half, Purewal is our striker who deals with the high ball best, and Dowson and Purewal had a very good partnership last season. That would be why Johnson got taken off.
Johnson is also our top scorer and our most natural finisher. Seen enough of the high balls tbh, becoming very unattractive to watch of late.

I thought with the supposed extra time on the ball we could have kept it on the ground more as we tried to do last season.
For you to insult me, I must first value your opinion.

al_quaker
Posts: 5943
Joined: Sat Jul 11, 2009 2:51 pm
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Same old question - Nathan Fisher

Post by al_quaker » Sat Sep 21, 2013 8:31 pm

We played plenty of direct stuff up to Purewal last season.

super_les_mcjannet
Posts: 6009
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2012 8:41 pm
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Same old question - Nathan Fisher

Post by super_les_mcjannet » Sat Sep 21, 2013 8:33 pm

Ingleby wrote:
al_quaker wrote:Johnson wasn't in the game second half, Purewal is our striker who deals with the high ball best, and Dowson and Purewal had a very good partnership last season. That would be why Johnson got taken off.
Johnson is also our top scorer and our most natural finisher. Seen enough of the high balls tbh, becoming very unattractive to watch of late.

I thought with the supposed extra time on the ball we could have kept it on the ground more as we tried to do last season.
Don't think we have found our best eleven yet or even our best way of playing but I agree up in the air will not get the best out of Johnson. What is our best CB pairing without Brown, Midfield partnership and stirke partnership.

Johnson's finishing with Dowson's work rate would be some player.

jimmyht
Posts: 251
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 12:00 pm
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Same old question - Nathan Fisher

Post by jimmyht » Sun Sep 22, 2013 7:30 pm

after speaking to one of his best mates, came on here thinking it was already a done deal? but whats been said may be true - told today he deffo wants to come (finally!) - but maybe we aint currently got the budget available to sign him?

quakersam
Posts: 4895
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 9:35 pm
Team Supported: Darlington
Location: MSG

Re: Same old question - Nathan Fisher

Post by quakersam » Sun Sep 22, 2013 7:38 pm

Feed the Fish

Done deal! Signed and sealed
QuakerSam ...Once a Quaker, always a Quaker

Post Reply