Darlington FC 2009 Ltd - Liquidator's rpt 2015
- Robbie Painter
- Posts: 2289
- Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2009 8:37 am
- Team Supported: Darlington
Darlington FC 2009 Ltd - Liquidator's rpt 2015
Might make interesting reading to some, last 12 months up to July 2015:
https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/comp ... download=0
Also whole filing history here (now free to download):
https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/comp ... ng-history
Shows Fulham paid £58.5k in Oct '14 & Charlton £4.6k in Dec '14. Of which £29.5k & £2.3k was paid to DFC 1883.
Also shows dividend payments to creditors, largest of which was £53.8k to Prestige Properties (Raj Singh's company).
https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/comp ... download=0
Also whole filing history here (now free to download):
https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/comp ... ng-history
Shows Fulham paid £58.5k in Oct '14 & Charlton £4.6k in Dec '14. Of which £29.5k & £2.3k was paid to DFC 1883.
Also shows dividend payments to creditors, largest of which was £53.8k to Prestige Properties (Raj Singh's company).
Robbie Painter - http://twitter.com/RobbiePainter
Re: Darlington FC 2009 Ltd - Liquidator's rpt 2015
And yet we still have people (including the FA) wrongly claiming that we went bust, and that we are a phoenix club. It is obviously impossible for a phoenix club to pay any of the debts of an unrelated club that went bust.
Re: Darlington FC 2009 Ltd - Liquidator's rpt 2015
Exactly.Quakerz wrote:And yet we still have people (including the FA) wrongly claiming that we went bust, and that we are a phoenix club. It is obviously impossible for a phoenix club to pay any of the debts of an unrelated club that went bust.
Its the name which causes this I believe. The sooner we can drop the numbers the better.
While I've always known that this was going to happen, this part makes sickening reading. There's also a (smaller) debt to that man himself.Robbie Painter wrote: Also shows dividend payments to creditors, largest of which was £53.8k to Prestige Properties (Raj Singh's company).
Re: Darlington FC 2009 Ltd - Liquidator's rpt 2015
Strictly speaking Darlington 1883 haven't paid any debts. DFC 2009 have passed on funds to Darlington 1883 once they were received for players they sold and of whom the rights to future fees (50% of) for had been bought by Darlington 1883.Quakerz wrote:And yet we still have people (including the FA) wrongly claiming that we went bust, and that we are a phoenix club. It is obviously impossible for a phoenix club to pay any of the debts of an unrelated club that went bust.
In effect the future transfer fees were an asset owned by DFC2009 50% of which bought by Darlington 1883. I guess any business could buy an asset in that way.
If the payment had been made to Darlington 1883 and then we'd passed it on to DFC 2009 then it would have proved beyond doubt we were the same club, but as the parent club paid to DFC 2009 it does sadly indicate that DFC 2009 are classed as "Darlington FC"
Re: Darlington FC 2009 Ltd - Liquidator's rpt 2015
Lalalalalalalalalala not listening lalalalalalalalalalala.
- bertbanger
- Posts: 433
- Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2012 10:18 am
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: Darlington FC 2009 Ltd - Liquidator's rpt 2015
so basically, as is the norm the "big" people get 100% of what they are owed, and the other businesses get 6.5 pence in the pound
so Raj decided not to honour his word then
so Raj decided not to honour his word then
Re: Darlington FC 2009 Ltd - Liquidator's rpt 2015
I wonder why Norwich gave us money? The only player that comes to mind that is playing there that was once with us is Kyle Lafferty.
Just a point, Dan Burn made his 20th game for Fulham at the beginning of October 2014. He has since made his 40th.
I believe the original transfer was reported that there were 2 payments to come based on appearance. That means that at some point this month we should receive another 29.5k.
Wonder why we owe Newcastle and Boro money.
Just a point, Dan Burn made his 20th game for Fulham at the beginning of October 2014. He has since made his 40th.
I believe the original transfer was reported that there were 2 payments to come based on appearance. That means that at some point this month we should receive another 29.5k.
Wonder why we owe Newcastle and Boro money.
Re: Darlington FC 2009 Ltd - Liquidator's rpt 2015
Quakerz wrote:Lalalalalalalalalala not listening lalalalalalalalalalala.
It honestly pained me to write it
-
- Posts: 1260
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 8:40 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: Darlington FC 2009 Ltd - Liquidator's rpt 2015
Norwich may have bought some remnants from Feethams, or the big screen from George's white elephant?lo36789 wrote:I wonder why Norwich gave us money? The only player that comes to mind that is playing there that was once with us is Kyle Lafferty.
Just a point, Dan Burn made his 20th game for Fulham at the beginning of October 2014. He has since made his 40th.
I believe the original transfer was reported that there were 2 payments to come based on appearance. That means that at some point this month we should receive another 29.5k.
Wonder why we owe Newcastle and Boro money.
- Magical Quakers
- Posts: 446
- Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2009 12:33 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
- Location: Nottingham
Re: Darlington FC 2009 Ltd - Liquidator's rpt 2015
It says it is a solidarity payment - good on them if they just gifted us £1k.lo36789 wrote:I wonder why Norwich gave us money?
Re: Darlington FC 2009 Ltd - Liquidator's rpt 2015
Solidarity payments (I think) are when a club is promoted back to the premier league the season after relegation from the premier league, and so their remaining parachute payments are split up between other clubs.Magical Quakers wrote:It says it is a solidarity payment - good on them if they just gifted us £1k.lo36789 wrote:I wonder why Norwich gave us money?
Or I could be completely wrong!
Re: Darlington FC 2009 Ltd - Liquidator's rpt 2015
I think you're completely right al_quaker
Re: Darlington FC 2009 Ltd - Liquidator's rpt 2015
The accounts say the payment was in relation to a player that had previously been on loan to DFClo36789 wrote:I wonder why Norwich gave us money? The only player that comes to mind that is playing there that was once with us is Kyle Lafferty.
...
Sent from my SM-T530 using Tapatalk
Re: Darlington FC 2009 Ltd - Liquidator's rpt 2015
Indeed. I had read that, which is why I mentioned Lafferty, he was on loan with us from Burnley years ago and now player for Norwich. I can't think of anyone else we have had either on loan from Norwich or played for Norwich in 2014/15 that has been on loan with us.TS3 wrote:The accounts say the payment was in relation to a player that had previously been on loan to DFClo36789 wrote:I wonder why Norwich gave us money? The only player that comes to mind that is playing there that was once with us is Kyle Lafferty.
...
It specifically calls out it is due to a player that was on loan, which isn't the re-distribution of parachutes? Unless that is the criteria that they look at the playing squad but that would be bizarre.
- ArmchairDiehard
- Posts: 228
- Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2015 4:27 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: Darlington FC 2009 Ltd - Liquidator's rpt 2015
Lafferty only came to us on loan from Burnley. Not sure that we'd be due any money from any future achievements / incentives.lo36789 wrote:I wonder why Norwich gave us money? The only player that comes to mind that is playing there that was once with us is Kyle Lafferty.
Just a point, Dan Burn made his 20th game for Fulham at the beginning of October 2014. He has since made his 40th.
I believe the original transfer was reported that there were 2 payments to come based on appearance. That means that at some point this month we should receive another 29.5k.
Wonder why we owe Newcastle and Boro money.
Quakerz wrote:What about Steve Backley?stayhigh13 wrote:I would hazard a guess as someone with a long throw who is also tall.
Re: Darlington FC 2009 Ltd - Liquidator's rpt 2015
ArmchairDiehard wrote:Lafferty only came to us on loan from Burnley. Not sure that we'd be due any money from any future achievements / incentives.lo36789 wrote:I wonder why Norwich gave us money? The only player that comes to mind that is playing there that was once with us is Kyle Lafferty.
Just a point, Dan Burn made his 20th game for Fulham at the beginning of October 2014. He has since made his 40th.
I believe the original transfer was reported that there were 2 payments to come based on appearance. That means that at some point this month we should receive another 29.5k.
Wonder why we owe Newcastle and Boro money.
So it would have been for Lafferty as we'd be considered part of his education.“If a professional is transferred before the expiry of his contract, any club that has contributed to his education and training shall receive a proportion of the compensation paid to his former club (solidarity contribution). The provisions concerning solidarity contributions are set out in Annexe 5 of these regulations.”
- ArmchairDiehard
- Posts: 228
- Joined: Sun Feb 15, 2015 4:27 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: Darlington FC 2009 Ltd - Liquidator's rpt 2015
Oh well. I stand corrected.
Every little helps I suppose.
Every little helps I suppose.
Quakerz wrote:What about Steve Backley?stayhigh13 wrote:I would hazard a guess as someone with a long throw who is also tall.
Re: Darlington FC 2009 Ltd - Liquidator's rpt 2015
Well you learn something new everyday.
Maybe Steve Staunton was just thinking really long term...get loads of players in and reap in the solidarity payments later on...
Maybe Steve Staunton was just thinking really long term...get loads of players in and reap in the solidarity payments later on...
- Quaker0006
- Posts: 166
- Joined: Sat Jul 11, 2009 6:46 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: Darlington FC 2009 Ltd - Liquidator's rpt 2015
Think it probably does relate to Lafferty. Theres a cross border policy of some sort that states clubs being owed if they contribute to players education even if on loan, before 24 years old. Seems its not well known