3 Darlington thugs to appear in court...

Open now for discussion of all things Darlo!

Moderators: mikkyx, uncovered

User avatar
HarrytheQuaker
Posts: 3148
Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 3:57 pm
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: 3 Darlington thugs to appear in court...

Post by HarrytheQuaker » Thu Sep 15, 2016 9:42 am

notgnilrad wrote:
Robbie Painter wrote:
notgnilrad wrote:Been told in court Wednesday, hopefully they will get their just desserts. :thumbup:
Did they?

Will let you know my mole hasn't got back to me yet.
Moles only come out at night..

User avatar
theoriginalfatcat
Posts: 6702
Joined: Wed Jul 15, 2009 7:40 pm
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: 3 Darlington thugs to appear in court...

Post by theoriginalfatcat » Thu Sep 15, 2016 10:30 am

liddle_4_ever wrote:
theoriginalfatcat wrote:
spen666 wrote:I refer you to the cases of In R v Armagh Justices (1897) 2 Ir 57, and R v Rymer (1877) 2 QBD 136
These cases make me chuckle - anything a little more up to date Spen ?
I don't think you know the legal system.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Does Spen??
Profile pic ↗️
Feethams the Panda. 28 Jan 2012.
Now extinct!

spen666
Posts: 2292
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 9:12 pm
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: 3 Darlington thugs to appear in court...

Post by spen666 » Thu Sep 15, 2016 11:38 am

theoriginalfatcat wrote: ...

Does Spen??
Well the Law Society thinks I do as do the government who employ me as a solicitor.

So I get paid out of your taxes- thanks very much


Try doing your own research http://solicitors.lawsociety.org.uk/

BUSHEAD
Posts: 1554
Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2009 12:02 pm
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: 3 Darlington thugs to appear in court...

Post by BUSHEAD » Fri Sep 16, 2016 9:54 am

spen666 wrote:
theoriginalfatcat wrote: ...

Does Spen??
Well the Law Society thinks I do as do the government who employ me as a solicitor.

So I get paid out of your taxes- thanks very much


Try doing your own research http://solicitors.lawsociety.org.uk/
Fuck off spen
Think before posting

User avatar
Lawman3
Posts: 1285
Joined: Sat Jul 11, 2009 7:47 pm
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: 3 Darlington thugs to appear in court...

Post by Lawman3 » Fri Sep 16, 2016 1:25 pm

spen666 wrote:
theoriginalfatcat wrote: ...

Does Spen??
Well the Law Society thinks I do as do the government who employ me as a solicitor.

So I get paid out of your taxes- thanks very much


Try doing your own research http://solicitors.lawsociety.org.uk/
It doesn't follow necessarily that being on the Roll means you know the legal system. I know several solicitors who know little of the areas in which they practice.
Never argue with an idiot: The best possible outcome is that you win an argument with an idiot.

User avatar
uncovered
Site Admin
Posts: 2234
Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2009 8:32 am

Re: 3 Darlington thugs to appear in court...

Post by uncovered » Mon Sep 19, 2016 4:21 pm

Darlogramps wrote:
loan_star wrote:
Darlogramps wrote: A couple of things - firstly pubs can't bar anyone, nor can DFC. There has to be a justification. Otherwise we end up in the situation we were in with George Reynolds, where he tried to censor anyone who criticised him.
DFC can bar whoever they want for any reason they want. It is a private club and they can deny admission if they choose to. Yes we don't want to go down the Reynolds route but if someone is due in court for offences relating to their support of DFC then the club have every right to deny admission.
There's always a pedant. The point I was making is that there must be a sufficient reason to ban an individual, otherwise there could be recourse from those who've had action taken against them.

Obviously if a "supporter" has committed an offence, that is sufficient justification for a ban.

But the more general point, that a club can ban who it likes for what it likes, is far too simplistic.
Just like to reiterate loan stars point. The club can ban anybody they like for no reason. How do I know this? Personal experience. And the. When my brother was being ejected from the arena he refused to leave as he had done nothing wrong. The police told him that it didn't matter, it was a private club and the owner can refuse entry to anybody he likes for no reason.

darlodaz
Posts: 147
Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2016 7:07 am
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: 3 Darlington thugs to appear in court...

Post by darlodaz » Mon Sep 19, 2016 4:50 pm

what happens now then if said person was a share holder?

Maurice_Peddelty
Posts: 953
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 10:40 pm
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: 3 Darlington thugs to appear in court...

Post by Maurice_Peddelty » Mon Sep 19, 2016 6:28 pm

darlodaz wrote:what happens now then if said person was a share holder?
Nothing - being a shareholder doesn't bring with it any special rights of access to premises except to attend the annual general meeting

Darlo Dodger
Posts: 283
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 9:50 pm
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: 3 Darlington thugs to appear in court...

Post by Darlo Dodger » Mon Sep 19, 2016 7:46 pm

Apologies for getting back to the subject of this thread but does anybody know if a court hearing has taken place and / or whether the alleged miscreants have been identified?

Post Reply