Page 1 of 3

3 Darlington thugs to appear in court...

Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2016 1:49 pm
by notgnilrad
tomorrow in Manchester, just heard off a friend don't want to say names though.

3 Darlington thugs to appear in court...

Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2016 1:59 pm
by HarrytheQuaker
For what??? No Darlo fans did anything wrong

Re: 3 Darlington thugs to appear in court...

Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2016 2:15 pm
by spen666
notgnilrad wrote:tomorrow in Manchester, just heard off a friend don't want to say names though.
if your source is correct, then their names will be made public anyway

Re: 3 Darlington thugs to appear in court...

Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2016 2:16 pm
by super_les_mcjannet
HarrytheQuaker wrote:For what??? No Darlo fan did anything wrong Image
If it's the FC United game the one or two did by all accounts.

I guess it will make the paper sooner or later.

Re: 3 Darlington thugs to appear in court...

Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2016 6:24 pm
by darlodaz
possible banning orders may happen here if the post is correct.

Re: 3 Darlington thugs to appear in court...

Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2016 6:30 pm
by quakerste
The post is correct there was trouble away from the ground three from Darlington were arrested, hopefully they get what they deserve and their mugshots are plastered across the Echo.

Re: 3 Darlington thugs to appear in court...

Posted: Tue Sep 06, 2016 9:57 pm
by Darlo_Pete
If they are found guilty, then I'm sure the club will putting banning orders on them. Hopefully tough action now, will make others think before they do something similar.

Re: 3 Darlington thugs to appear in court...

Posted: Wed Sep 07, 2016 7:37 am
by murtonquaker
At what level does Court enforced national/international football banning orders kick in, Step 1 or 2?

Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk

Re: 3 Darlington thugs to appear in court...

Posted: Wed Sep 07, 2016 8:09 am
by Neil Johnson
murtonquaker wrote:At what level does Court enforced national/international football banning orders kick in, Step 1 or 2?

Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk
It may need a DFSG membership vote on banning anyone convicted, however I suppose the DFC board can already decide on the fans' behalf.

Re: 3 Darlington thugs to appear in court...

Posted: Wed Sep 07, 2016 8:13 am
by Spyman
Neil Johnson wrote:
murtonquaker wrote:At what level does Court enforced national/international football banning orders kick in, Step 1 or 2?

Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk
It may need a DFSG membership vote on banning anyone convicted, however I suppose the DFC board can already decide on the fans' behalf.
:lol:

Re: 3 Darlington thugs to appear in court...

Posted: Wed Sep 07, 2016 12:26 pm
by spen666
murtonquaker wrote:At what level does Court enforced national/international football banning orders kick in, Step 1 or 2?

Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk
Banning orders cover matches in the National League North/ South and above

Re: 3 Darlington thugs to appear in court...

Posted: Wed Sep 07, 2016 12:40 pm
by AndyPark
Spyman wrote:
Neil Johnson wrote:
murtonquaker wrote:At what level does Court enforced national/international football banning orders kick in, Step 1 or 2?

Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk
It may need a DFSG membership vote on banning anyone convicted, however I suppose the DFC board can already decide on the fans' behalf.
:lol:
I thought the same :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: 3 Darlington thugs to appear in court...

Posted: Wed Sep 07, 2016 1:25 pm
by Ingleby
Neil Johnson wrote:
murtonquaker wrote:At what level does Court enforced national/international football banning orders kick in, Step 1 or 2?

Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk
It may need a DFSG membership vote on banning anyone convicted, however I suppose the DFC board can already decide on the fans' behalf.
Gift that keeps giving. :clap:

Re: 3 Darlington thugs to appear in court...

Posted: Wed Sep 07, 2016 2:07 pm
by notgnilrad
Court date for these guys have been put back to next week now. Wish it was today as they would have been named and shamed.

Re: 3 Darlington thugs to appear in court...

Posted: Wed Sep 07, 2016 6:50 pm
by Jamm
From Conference North upwards banning orders can be given even without conviction if magistrates, upon application by police, believe that such an order may prevent disorder. Section 14b Football Spectaors Act 1989 (as amended), or 14a with conviction.

3 Darlington thugs to appear in court...

Posted: Wed Sep 07, 2016 7:16 pm
by liddle_4_ever
As far as I know, as the game is on private property we can individually ban anyone we like and can advise our opponents in away games to ban the same people. This could be done at any level.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Re: 3 Darlington thugs to appear in court...

Posted: Wed Sep 07, 2016 10:10 pm
by olrad
See one of the scroats was at tonight's game , threatening our own fans who he thought were responsible for pointing him out ...knob head will be getting pointed out alright at the next game he shows his scrawny face at .

Re: 3 Darlington thugs to appear in court...

Posted: Thu Sep 08, 2016 8:21 am
by darlo2001uk
notgnilrad wrote:Court date for these guys have been put back to next week now. Wish it was today as they would have been named and shamed.
Nothing to stop them being named now so long as nothing is published that prejudices the court case.

Re: 3 Darlington thugs to appear in court...

Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2016 9:23 pm
by Neil Johnson
As pubs can bar anyone, so can DFC at their ground.

Away bans would need a National banning order, where those ignoring a ban can be registered on fan camera phones. and sent back to court by DFC and the police.

Is that too simple?

Re: 3 Darlington thugs to appear in court...

Posted: Sat Sep 10, 2016 8:05 am
by Darlogramps
Neil Johnson wrote:As pubs can bar anyone, so can DFC at their ground.

Away bans would need a National banning order, where those ignoring a ban can be registered on fan camera phones. and sent back to court by DFC and the police.

Is that too simple?
You're too simple. Everyone's said this for the months and years you've been cluttering up this board with your verbal garbage.

A couple of things - firstly pubs can't bar anyone, nor can DFC. There has to be a justification. Otherwise we end up in the situation we were in with George Reynolds, where he tried to censor anyone who criticised him.

Secondly, banning orders need to be enforced. That's more difficult for a part-time, volunteer run club. That's why we've been plagued with a minority hooligan element at some of our away games.

It's not an excuse (and I think the club could have done more in the past), but there are clearly challenges we face that a full time professional club will not.

But your idea, that enforcement of a ban relies solely on fans taking pictures at games, is way too simplistic.

The point is steps should be taken to stop these fans getting into the ground in the first place (distributing names and pictures of banned supporters to home clubs/ police etc).

Re: 3 Darlington thugs to appear in court...

Posted: Sat Sep 10, 2016 10:49 am
by loan_star
Darlogramps wrote: A couple of things - firstly pubs can't bar anyone, nor can DFC. There has to be a justification. Otherwise we end up in the situation we were in with George Reynolds, where he tried to censor anyone who criticised him.
DFC can bar whoever they want for any reason they want. It is a private club and they can deny admission if they choose to. Yes we don't want to go down the Reynolds route but if someone is due in court for offences relating to their support of DFC then the club have every right to deny admission.

Re: 3 Darlington thugs to appear in court...

Posted: Sat Sep 10, 2016 12:07 pm
by darlodaz
fuckn knob end darlogramps again. knows it all.cant wait to tap you on the shoulder only a matter of time sir lets see what you have to say face to face!!

Re: 3 Darlington thugs to appear in court...

Posted: Sat Sep 10, 2016 12:37 pm
by Beano
darlodaz wrote:fuckn knob end darlogramps again. knows it all.cant wait to tap you on the shoulder only a matter of time sir lets see what you have to say face to face!!
Enjoy your court appearance.

Re: 3 Darlington thugs to appear in court...

Posted: Sat Sep 10, 2016 1:36 pm
by Darlogramps
darlodaz wrote:fuckn knob end darlogramps again. knows it all.cant wait to tap you on the shoulder only a matter of time sir lets see what you have to say face to face!!
Keep up your obsession boyo. It is very weird, but each to their own.

Re: 3 Darlington thugs to appear in court...

Posted: Sat Sep 10, 2016 1:46 pm
by Darlogramps
loan_star wrote:
Darlogramps wrote: A couple of things - firstly pubs can't bar anyone, nor can DFC. There has to be a justification. Otherwise we end up in the situation we were in with George Reynolds, where he tried to censor anyone who criticised him.
DFC can bar whoever they want for any reason they want. It is a private club and they can deny admission if they choose to. Yes we don't want to go down the Reynolds route but if someone is due in court for offences relating to their support of DFC then the club have every right to deny admission.
There's always a pedant. The point I was making is that there must be a sufficient reason to ban an individual, otherwise there could be recourse from those who've had action taken against them.

Obviously if a "supporter" has committed an offence, that is sufficient justification for a ban.

But the more general point, that a club can ban who it likes for what it likes, is far too simplistic.

Re: 3 Darlington thugs to appear in court...

Posted: Sat Sep 10, 2016 5:31 pm
by spen666
Darlogramps wrote:
loan_star wrote:
Darlogramps wrote: A couple of things - firstly pubs can't bar anyone, nor can DFC. There has to be a justification. Otherwise we end up in the situation we were in with George Reynolds, where he tried to censor anyone who criticised him.
DFC can bar whoever they want for any reason they want. It is a private club and they can deny admission if they choose to. Yes we don't want to go down the Reynolds route but if someone is due in court for offences relating to their support of DFC then the club have every right to deny admission.
There's always a pedant. The point I was making is that there must be a sufficient reason to ban an individual, otherwise there could be recourse from those who've had action taken against them.

Obviously if a "supporter" has committed an offence, that is sufficient justification for a ban.

But the more general point, that a club can ban who it likes for what it likes, is far too simplistic.
As has been said already a club or pub can bar anyone simply because they want to.

No one has any right to enter a pub or football ground.

The owner of pub or football club needs no reason to ban someone

Re: 3 Darlington thugs to appear in court...

Posted: Sat Sep 10, 2016 7:40 pm
by Darlogramps
spen666 wrote:
Darlogramps wrote:
loan_star wrote:
Darlogramps wrote: A couple of things - firstly pubs can't bar anyone, nor can DFC. There has to be a justification. Otherwise we end up in the situation we were in with George Reynolds, where he tried to censor anyone who criticised him.
DFC can bar whoever they want for any reason they want. It is a private club and they can deny admission if they choose to. Yes we don't want to go down the Reynolds route but if someone is due in court for offences relating to their support of DFC then the club have every right to deny admission.
There's always a pedant. The point I was making is that there must be a sufficient reason to ban an individual, otherwise there could be recourse from those who've had action taken against them.

Obviously if a "supporter" has committed an offence, that is sufficient justification for a ban.

But the more general point, that a club can ban who it likes for what it likes, is far too simplistic.
As has been said already a club or pub can bar anyone simply because they want to.

No one has any right to enter a pub or football ground.

The owner of pub or football club needs no reason to ban someone
Spen666 in being deliberately obtuse shocker.

Re: 3 Darlington thugs to appear in court...

Posted: Sat Sep 10, 2016 8:35 pm
by loan_star
Darlogramps wrote:
spen666 wrote:
Darlogramps wrote:
loan_star wrote:
Darlogramps wrote: A couple of things - firstly pubs can't bar anyone, nor can DFC. There has to be a justification. Otherwise we end up in the situation we were in with George Reynolds, where he tried to censor anyone who criticised him.
DFC can bar whoever they want for any reason they want. It is a private club and they can deny admission if they choose to. Yes we don't want to go down the Reynolds route but if someone is due in court for offences relating to their support of DFC then the club have every right to deny admission.
There's always a pedant. The point I was making is that there must be a sufficient reason to ban an individual, otherwise there could be recourse from those who've had action taken against them.

Obviously if a "supporter" has committed an offence, that is sufficient justification for a ban.

But the more general point, that a club can ban who it likes for what it likes, is far too simplistic.
As has been said already a club or pub can bar anyone simply because they want to.

No one has any right to enter a pub or football ground.

The owner of pub or football club needs no reason to ban someone
Spen666 in being deliberately obtuse shocker.
The fact is Spen is correct.

Re: 3 Darlington thugs to appear in court...

Posted: Sat Sep 10, 2016 9:12 pm
by Darlogramps
No he's not.
It's a reductionist argument which ignores other factors (recourse from individuals involved, reputational damage) that mean it simply couldn't happen in the real world.

It's a shame you've decided to follow a worthless troll like Spen and deliberately ignore the points I'm making.

Re: 3 Darlington thugs to appear in court...

Posted: Sat Sep 10, 2016 9:38 pm
by spen666
Darlogramps wrote:No he's not.
It's a reductionist argument which ignores other factors (recourse from individuals involved, reputational damage) that mean it simply couldn't happen in the real world.

It's a shame you've decided to follow a worthless troll like Spen and deliberately ignore the points I'm making.
Sadly Gramps it is the legally correct answer. You are wrong in law.
Accept the facts.

You may have the moral high ground d but not the legal high ground.


Try looking up the law and deal with facts rather than resort to the use of abuse.

If you think stating what the law actually is, is abuse or trolling, then it says more about you than me.