The Telford situation

Open now for discussion of all things Darlo!

Moderators: mikkyx, uncovered

Post Reply
princes town
Posts: 4127
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2011 2:14 pm
Team Supported: Darlington/Blackburn

The Telford situation

Post by princes town » Wed Apr 26, 2017 7:54 pm


Darlo_Pete
Posts: 14111
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 10:13 pm
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: The Telford situation

Post by Darlo_Pete » Wed Apr 26, 2017 9:36 pm

Talked to a few Telford officials after the game on Saturday, nice people and I'm pleased they avoided relegation. Hope things work out for them off the pitch as well.

princes town
Posts: 4127
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2011 2:14 pm
Team Supported: Darlington/Blackburn

Re: The Telford situation

Post by princes town » Wed Apr 26, 2017 10:16 pm

yes the same Pete. the manager has already accepted that the club won't be able to compete in the North without further funding.

User avatar
Mr_Tibbs
Posts: 3293
Joined: Fri Jul 31, 2009 8:55 pm
Team Supported: The Almighty Darlo
Location: Gruzia
Contact:

Re: The Telford situation

Post by Mr_Tibbs » Thu Apr 27, 2017 6:50 am

Slightly different in that they are a Co-operative rather than a Community Benefit Society, a co-operative being for the mutual benefit of their members while we are set up for the benefit of the wider community.

princes town
Posts: 4127
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2011 2:14 pm
Team Supported: Darlington/Blackburn

Re: The Telford situation

Post by princes town » Thu Apr 27, 2017 7:42 am

Mr_Tibbs wrote:Slightly different in that they are a Co-operative rather than a Community Benefit Society, a co-operative being for the mutual benefit of their members while we are set up for the benefit of the wider community.
Ok thanks for that ckarification. Their manager seems to have accepted a budget cut.

TDS
Posts: 945
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 2:15 pm
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: The Telford situation

Post by TDS » Thu Apr 27, 2017 8:51 am

princes town wrote:
Mr_Tibbs wrote:Slightly different in that they are a Co-operative rather than a Community Benefit Society, a co-operative being for the mutual benefit of their members while we are set up for the benefit of the wider community.
Ok thanks for that ckarification. Their manager seems to have accepted a budget cut.
God forbid.

spen666
Posts: 2298
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 9:12 pm
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: The Telford situation

Post by spen666 » Thu Apr 27, 2017 12:03 pm

Mr_Tibbs wrote:Slightly different in that they are a Co-operative rather than a Community Benefit Society, a co-operative being for the mutual benefit of their members while we are set up for the benefit of the wider community.

Out of curiosity and not a dig, what wider community benefit do Darlington provide via their CBS than Telford do via their Co-op structure and why was a CBS chosen as opposed to a co-operative?

User avatar
Mr_Tibbs
Posts: 3293
Joined: Fri Jul 31, 2009 8:55 pm
Team Supported: The Almighty Darlo
Location: Gruzia
Contact:

Re: The Telford situation

Post by Mr_Tibbs » Thu Apr 27, 2017 1:11 pm

spen666 wrote:
Mr_Tibbs wrote:Slightly different in that they are a Co-operative rather than a Community Benefit Society, a co-operative being for the mutual benefit of their members while we are set up for the benefit of the wider community.

Out of curiosity and not a dig, what wider community benefit do Darlington provide via their CBS than Telford do via their Co-op structure and why was a CBS chosen as opposed to a co-operative?
They're fair questions. We might all have our own ideas what the wider community might be - the economy of the town? Relationships with schools to give kids something else to do than rip wing mirrors off cars?

It's all in the wording of what we're set up to do, and I think the DFCSG is allowed to invest in other community-oriented ventures too, not just the football team.

As for why we were set up as a CBS instead of a Co-operative I don't really know, except that it came about as the merger of the Trust, Supporters Club, and the Community Interest Company which was the first vehicle we used to band together and save the club during the time of the interim board.

It may have been a requirement that we carry on with the same community benefits of the CIC that we became a CBS, I don't really know, but all members of those 3 groups voted on it.

Best answers I can give from memory.

Maurice_Peddelty
Posts: 960
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 10:40 pm
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: The Telford situation

Post by Maurice_Peddelty » Thu Apr 27, 2017 2:22 pm

spen666 wrote:
Mr_Tibbs wrote:Slightly different in that they are a Co-operative rather than a Community Benefit Society, a co-operative being for the mutual benefit of their members while we are set up for the benefit of the wider community.

Out of curiosity and not a dig, what wider community benefit do Darlington provide via their CBS than Telford do via their Co-op structure and why was a CBS chosen as opposed to a co-operative?
The significant difference is that the business of DFCSG is to be conducted for the benefit of the community served by the football club and not for the profit of its members,
whereas a co-operative society is a business that distributes its profits amongst its members.

Post Reply