Wearmouth and Jameson : Available for loan

Open now for discussion of all things Darlo!

Moderators: mikkyx, uncovered

User avatar
TinShedDarloFan
Posts: 2497
Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2009 7:43 am
Team Supported: Darlington
Location: Darlington

Re: Wearmouth and Jameson : Available for loan

Post by TinShedDarloFan » Thu Aug 03, 2017 7:51 pm

On the subject of goalkeepers, i notice we has 3 at the clubs photoshoot today, Bartlett, Jameson and Ed!

Quakers83
Posts: 214
Joined: Sun Mar 19, 2017 10:40 am
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Wearmouth and Jameson : Available for loan

Post by Quakers83 » Thu Aug 03, 2017 7:55 pm

Along with Fenwick, Richards and Wheatley.

quakerste
Posts: 1519
Joined: Sat Jul 11, 2009 7:07 pm
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Wearmouth and Jameson : Available for loan

Post by quakerste » Thu Aug 03, 2017 8:04 pm

Really liked the look of Wheatley definitely in the mould of Turnbull. One to keep our eye on if he can break into the team.

Darlofan97
Posts: 5722
Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2010 1:44 pm
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Wearmouth and Jameson : Available for loan

Post by Darlofan97 » Thu Aug 03, 2017 8:22 pm

Other player possibly looking like Bradley Fewster. 8 in 24 for York in League 2 a couple of seasons ago.

Will be interesting to see if we have signed any of the 4 mentioned above + Ed. Certainly expect some departures.

User avatar
Spyman
Posts: 12672
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 10:04 pm
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Wearmouth and Jameson : Available for loan

Post by Spyman » Thu Aug 03, 2017 8:30 pm

Darlofan97 wrote:
Spyman wrote: No of course not. But we're sending people out on loan (because as much as anything, it makes financial sense to get the likes of Wearmouth and Jameson off the wage bill while they're not playing) and releasing young players - I don't really understand the purpose of our reserve team, that's all. I've never really seen it explained.

What is the bigger picture that I'm missing?
http://darlingtonfootballclub.co.uk/qua ... erve-team/
"First team manager Martin Gray said; “This is the final piece of the jigsaw, something we’ve been intending to put into place over the last year or two. The aim is to use this as mainly an Under 23 team, giving an opportunity for Under 18 players to continue their development."
The reserve team also forms a basis for players returning from injury / suspension to gain match fitness at a competitive standard when the first-team aren't playing, as we have recently seen with Portas & Wearmouth.

We have also seen un-used first-team players feature in reserve fixtures this pre-season too.

We also used the reserves for the first-team to keep fit / get minutes over winter last year.
But what jigsaw is it the final piece of? Because of the jigsaw is the return to the football league that Gray talks of, we are still several pieces short.

You go on to say that we are no longer a professional set-up - well that's kind of my point. Can we afford to carry a reserve side that doesn't appear to offer any real tangible benefit at the moment? You say it gives us the chance to get players fit again after injury, but Wearmouth has just been made available for loan - a far more sensible way to get players matches if you ask me as it means they're off the wage bill.

I'll continue to scrutinize because I think it is important as a fan owned club that we do scrutinize. You seem happy to back every decision and that's your choice. Plenty of wrong decisions have been made by plenty of people over the years though so while my scrutiny may bore you, it won't stop. Like I said to someone else, I'm not trying to entertain - I'm hoping that people will see there is a far far bigger picture than the players we put out on the pitch each week and that we may well end up throwing money away if we don't/can't go up this season.

Of course I didn't expect the money to be raised in a few short months, but I'd like to see it as a priority being out ahead of what is happening on the pitch - because ultimately the lack of a stand is what will hold us back, not an inability to put a promotion challenging team together.

While the stand building fund is stalling, it galls me to see money spent in areas that we don't need to spend it. I don't think that's an unfair position to take at all.

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
On Sunday April 29, 2012 at 10:25 pm, Darlo Cockney wrote:Sadly some people have nothing better to do that invent rumours.

We will be playing at the arena again next season - fact.

Quakerz - if you actually attended games and spoke to people you might actually find our facts, rather than spreading s*** on this board.

DC

User avatar
don'tbuythesun
Posts: 2412
Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2010 12:24 pm
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Wearmouth and Jameson : Available for loan

Post by don'tbuythesun » Thu Aug 03, 2017 10:16 pm

I think as a fan owned club there should be a high degree of transparency. I'm hoping that our CEO who appears to have made a positive start has a handle on this and is keeping things within budget. Even better would be that we don't need the boost the budget money and could use it to move straight to phase 3 stand funding!!

Darlo_Pete
Posts: 14107
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 10:13 pm
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Wearmouth and Jameson : Available for loan

Post by Darlo_Pete » Fri Aug 04, 2017 5:53 am

I'm sure that the reserves will help with bringing players from the fringes into the first team and also help with building up fitness for the players who get injured and can't jump straight back into the first team.

Darlogramps
Posts: 6025
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 10:47 am
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Wearmouth and Jameson : Available for loan

Post by Darlogramps » Fri Aug 04, 2017 7:30 am

Darlofan97 wrote:
Spyman wrote:
Emdubya wrote:
Spyman wrote:
HarryCharltonsCat wrote:We don't really do youth though do we. Which is quite ironic.
Indeed.

If only we had some kind of second team in which to give these promising young players some experience of competitive football.

Does anyone have any idea how much our reserve team costs us to run?
No idea at all Spyman,but let's do away with it anyway just in case it does cost something to run.
Money obsessed.
We have to be, don't we?

We have to make every penny count and prioritise spending. A reserve team that isn't benefitting the first team or the balance sheet is surely a luxury.

Everyone wants this club to progress, and that can only happen if we can afford to progress - which at the moment we can't.
Playing squad expenditure this week, reserve side the next.

We know that we need to raise funds for a new stand. The Board knows, the Supporters Group knows, the management team & players know, as do the fans.

Your constant reminders that we cannot currently progress is tedious and boring. Unless you were expecting c£130k worth of construction to be raised and completed by now.

And yes, I know that we need to raise c£80k to progress, but I also respect the fact that we have 5 months to raise these funds, and a further 3 to complete this work.

Your constant scrutinising of areas is boring.
This is such a dangerous position to take.

The fans are the ones who run the club. No one else gives a stuff. It's down to the fans to ensure this club is a success.

This includes holding the decision-makers to account and highlighting issues we may have.

To turn round and say someone scrutinising the club is boring is naive in the extreme. Given our "rocky" recent history financially, it is not unreasonable to scrutinise and question decision that are made about our spending.

It's not done to drag the club down or be negative (as I believe you seem to think it is) but it's out of concern further problems are going to emerge down the line.
If ever you're bored or miserable:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZlZohZoadGY

HarryCharltonsCat
Posts: 1023
Joined: Thu Sep 24, 2009 8:06 pm
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Wearmouth and Jameson : Available for loan

Post by HarryCharltonsCat » Fri Aug 04, 2017 8:57 am

Darlofan97 wrote:
Spyman wrote:
HarryCharltonsCat wrote:We don't really do youth though do we. Which is quite ironic.
Indeed.

If only we had some kind of second team in which to give these promising young players some experience of competitive football.

Does anyone have any idea how much our reserve team costs us to run?
We do give youth players a chance in the reserve set-up.
And when we get one like Saunders, who appears as if he can cope at the level we are at, we bring three players in over his head.

User avatar
Spyman
Posts: 12672
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 10:04 pm
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Wearmouth and Jameson : Available for loan

Post by Spyman » Fri Aug 04, 2017 10:10 am

HarryCharltonsCat wrote:
Darlofan97 wrote:
Spyman wrote:
HarryCharltonsCat wrote:We don't really do youth though do we. Which is quite ironic.
Indeed.

If only we had some kind of second team in which to give these promising young players some experience of competitive football.

Does anyone have any idea how much our reserve team costs us to run?
We do give youth players a chance in the reserve set-up.
And when we get one like Saunders, who appears as if he can cope at the level we are at, we bring three players in over his head.
Laughable, isn't it?!
On Sunday April 29, 2012 at 10:25 pm, Darlo Cockney wrote:Sadly some people have nothing better to do that invent rumours.

We will be playing at the arena again next season - fact.

Quakerz - if you actually attended games and spoke to people you might actually find our facts, rather than spreading s*** on this board.

DC

JE93
Posts: 1864
Joined: Sun Nov 29, 2009 2:48 pm
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Wearmouth and Jameson : Available for loan

Post by JE93 » Fri Aug 04, 2017 11:15 am

There are now two words that are incredibly important for this season and MG performance management.

It's clear he has been given the budget he wants if indeed we have made all of these signings. Even if this is partially off-set by some departures in the coming months. I can't deny with my fan hat on I'm really excited if we have signed these players. With my business strategy hat on I wonder if it the best allocation of resources.

But if it is the case that we have now given MG what he wants then he has to have strict performance management targets in place.
- While I was happy with the signings we'd made over the summer I was expecting a close scrap for the play-offs, with a realistic target of finishing 6th or 7th. With this team I expect to be top 5.

- FA cup, we have been notoriously bad in this competition this is an opportunity to gain extra revenue and profile. I'd expect at least 2 wins. Which, if I've got my rounds right, would be £20k in prize money + Gate receipts.
(prize money available here: http://www.thefa.com/competitions/thefa ... prize-fund).

- FA Trophy again another competition we have under performed in. 3 wins could be worth £11k + Gate receipts.
(Prize money available here: http://www.thefa.com/competitions/fa-tr ... prize-fund).

In addition our CEO and commercial people have to get the advertising at BM sold out, as well as any hospitality. We have to reduce matchday costs on security etc.

The fans have had a lot of expectation put upon them, and we have always delivered, and I believe we will continue to deliver. But if these big expectations are to be put on the fans. I want equally stringent expectations put on our paid staff. £31k in prize money and £20k from sales across 5 matches would bring us a lot closer to success.

User avatar
Spyman
Posts: 12672
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 10:04 pm
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Wearmouth and Jameson : Available for loan

Post by Spyman » Fri Aug 04, 2017 11:27 am

JE93 wrote:There are now two words that are incredibly important for this season and MG performance management.

It's clear he has been given the budget he wants if indeed we have made all of these signings. Even if this is partially off-set by some departures in the coming months. I can't deny with my fan hat on I'm really excited if we have signed these players. With my business strategy hat on I wonder if it the best allocation of resources.

But if it is the case that we have now given MG what he wants then he has to have strict performance management targets in place.
- While I was happy with the signings we'd made over the summer I was expecting a close scrap for the play-offs, with a realistic target of finishing 6th or 7th. With this team I expect to be top 5.

- FA cup, we have been notoriously bad in this competition this is an opportunity to gain extra revenue and profile. I'd expect at least 2 wins. Which, if I've got my rounds right, would be £20k in prize money + Gate receipts.
(prize money available here: http://www.thefa.com/competitions/thefa ... prize-fund).

- FA Trophy again another competition we have under performed in. 3 wins could be worth £11k + Gate receipts.
(Prize money available here: http://www.thefa.com/competitions/fa-tr ... prize-fund).

In addition our CEO and commercial people have to get the advertising at BM sold out, as well as any hospitality. We have to reduce matchday costs on security etc.

The fans have had a lot of expectation put upon them, and we have always delivered, and I believe we will continue to deliver. But if these big expectations are to be put on the fans. I want equally stringent expectations put on our paid staff. £31k in prize money and £20k from sales across 5 matches would bring us a lot closer to success.
I think it's also fair to suggest that if we finish in the play-off places and do not have a ground fit for promotion, the CEO should stand down (or whoever is responsible for the allocation of funds).
On Sunday April 29, 2012 at 10:25 pm, Darlo Cockney wrote:Sadly some people have nothing better to do that invent rumours.

We will be playing at the arena again next season - fact.

Quakerz - if you actually attended games and spoke to people you might actually find our facts, rather than spreading s*** on this board.

DC

roadrunner
Posts: 339
Joined: Sat Jul 18, 2009 7:15 pm
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Wearmouth and Jameson : Available for loan

Post by roadrunner » Fri Aug 04, 2017 2:56 pm

Wearmouth gone to west Auckland on loan

Post Reply