Page 5 of 5
Re: Bradley Fewster
Posted: Sun Aug 13, 2017 7:21 pm
by e4sby
Maybe Fenwick was brought in on a months contract to cover for Beck.
Beck is now fit and Fewster maybe to be brought in at the end of Fenwicks contract?
I wouldn't be against Saunders going out on loan to gain some regular football at a decent level
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Re: Bradley Fewster
Posted: Tue Aug 15, 2017 1:42 pm
by H1987
Spyman wrote:In all honesty, unless this guy really is out of this world, who would we let go/drop for him?
Caton has hit the ground running by all accounts. Beck is a class act. Saunders looks good and in my opinion not giving him a good shot at the team this season sends out totally the wrong message. Gillies, Thompson and Ferguson are all quality.
We can only really justify those six in the match day squad unless Ferguson drops back to left back, which I can't see happening while he's making such an impact on the wing.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Fenwick, and to be honest, i'd be happy to let Caton go in favour of Fewster as well. It's not to say I don't rate either of them, I just happen to think Fewster is an upgrade, and perhaps most importantly, could potentially have great resale value.
Re: Bradley Fewster
Posted: Tue Aug 15, 2017 1:54 pm
by Spyman
H1987 wrote:Spyman wrote:In all honesty, unless this guy really is out of this world, who would we let go/drop for him?
Caton has hit the ground running by all accounts. Beck is a class act. Saunders looks good and in my opinion not giving him a good shot at the team this season sends out totally the wrong message. Gillies, Thompson and Ferguson are all quality.
We can only really justify those six in the match day squad unless Ferguson drops back to left back, which I can't see happening while he's making such an impact on the wing.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Fenwick, and to be honest, i'd be happy to let Caton go in favour of Fewster as well. It's not to say I don't rate either of them, I just happen to think Fewster is an upgrade, and perhaps most importantly, could potentially have great resale value.
Do you know Fewster is an upgrade? Or are we going on the word of others?
Agree on resale value, but Caton sounds like he's an upgrade on what we had before so is it a bit of an unnecessary risk to swap him out for someone who may or may not be an improvement?
Re: Bradley Fewster
Posted: Wed Aug 16, 2017 9:40 am
by H1987
It's hard to say, but he's shown glimpses he's good enough in the Football League, and it was a surprise to most he has dropped this far down. That suggests to me he could be a level above guys like Fenwick, who I have nothing against, but he hardly shone for York in the National.
Still bizarre this is dragging on. Has no one asked MG in an interview what is going on?
Re: Bradley Fewster
Posted: Sun Aug 27, 2017 4:25 pm
by dfcjosh
Anyone know what's going on with this guy? Few rumours going round that he's currently injured and can't yet pass a medical.
Re: Bradley Fewster
Posted: Sun Aug 27, 2017 6:21 pm
by roadrunner
dfcjosh wrote:Anyone know what's going on with this guy? Few rumours going round that he's currently injured and can't yet pass a medical.
Currently injured no club as yet but Bristol rovers sniffing around, wants to stay in the north east so don't rule out pools or going back to york.
Re: Bradley Fewster
Posted: Sun Aug 27, 2017 11:01 pm
by HarryCharltonsCat
Spyman wrote:H1987 wrote:Spyman wrote:In all honesty, unless this guy really is out of this world, who would we let go/drop for him?
Caton has hit the ground running by all accounts. Beck is a class act. Saunders looks good and in my opinion not giving him a good shot at the team this season sends out totally the wrong message. Gillies, Thompson and Ferguson are all quality.
We can only really justify those six in the match day squad unless Ferguson drops back to left back, which I can't see happening while he's making such an impact on the wing.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Fenwick, and to be honest, i'd be happy to let Caton go in favour of Fewster as well. It's not to say I don't rate either of them, I just happen to think Fewster is an upgrade, and perhaps most importantly, could potentially have great resale value.
Do you know Fewster is an upgrade? Or are we going on the word of others?
Agree on resale value, but Caton sounds like he's an upgrade on what we had before so is it a bit of an unnecessary risk to swap him out for someone who may or may not be an improvement?
Think it might be premature calling Caton an upgrade. Don't see him scoring as many as Cartman, which i'm assuming was the point.
Re: Bradley Fewster
Posted: Mon Aug 28, 2017 9:27 am
by loan_star
HarryCharltonsCat wrote:
Think it might be premature calling Caton an upgrade. Don't see him scoring as many as Cartman, which i'm assuming was the point.
And Cartman was hardly prolific last season was he. Great work rate but his confidence in front of goal had gone in my opinion.
Re: Bradley Fewster
Posted: Mon Aug 28, 2017 12:07 pm
by Darlo_Pete
I think bringing back Cartman would be a backward step.
Re: Bradley Fewster
Posted: Mon Aug 28, 2017 12:17 pm
by HarryCharltonsCat
loan_star wrote:HarryCharltonsCat wrote:
Think it might be premature calling Caton an upgrade. Don't see him scoring as many as Cartman, which i'm assuming was the point.
And Cartman was hardly prolific last season was he. Great work rate but his confidence in front of goal had gone in my opinion.
Didn't say he was, i said I don't see Caton being any more prolific when apparently he's an upgrade. There is a reason non of his previous clubs have played him as a central striker. Am fine with him as a player, i just don't see 15 goals in him.
Re: Bradley Fewster
Posted: Mon Aug 28, 2017 4:46 pm
by SwansQuaker83
HarryCharltonsCat wrote:loan_star wrote:HarryCharltonsCat wrote:
Think it might be premature calling Caton an upgrade. Don't see him scoring as many as Cartman, which i'm assuming was the point.
And Cartman was hardly prolific last season was he. Great work rate but his confidence in front of goal had gone in my opinion.
Didn't say he was, i said I don't see Caton being any more prolific when apparently he's an upgrade. There is a reason non of his previous clubs have played him as a central striker. Am fine with him as a player, i just don't see 15 goals in him.
Isn't he a winger?
Re: Bradley Fewster
Posted: Tue Aug 29, 2017 4:15 am
by dfcjosh
roadrunner wrote:dfcjosh wrote:Anyone know what's going on with this guy? Few rumours going round that he's currently injured and can't yet pass a medical.
Currently injured no club as yet but Bristol rovers sniffing around, wants to stay in the north east so don't rule out pools or going back to york.
Don't think york need a striker and seems like Pools are getting Ryan Bowman. What's all the talk about it having to be done by Thursday? Thought free transfers could be made until March?
Re: Bradley Fewster
Posted: Tue Aug 29, 2017 10:33 am
by real_darlo_85
dfcjosh wrote:roadrunner wrote:dfcjosh wrote:Anyone know what's going on with this guy? Few rumours going round that he's currently injured and can't yet pass a medical.
Currently injured no club as yet but Bristol rovers sniffing around, wants to stay in the north east so don't rule out pools or going back to york.
Don't think york need a striker and seems like Pools are getting Ryan Bowman. What's all the talk about it having to be done by Thursday? Thought free transfers could be made until March?
There are no restrictions on transfers, this will be to register in time for squad contention on Saturday.
Re: Bradley Fewster
Posted: Tue Aug 29, 2017 11:26 am
by H1987
Here's hoping we get him in, i have serious doubts about Fenwick, and Caton needs too many chances (if Saturday is anything to go by). We would've been much better off with Saunders yesterday, they looked vulnerable to pace.