Open now for discussion of all things Darlo!
Moderators: mikkyx, uncovered
-
Spyman
- Posts: 12672
- Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 10:04 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
Post
by Spyman » Mon Aug 14, 2017 8:50 pm
Darlogramps wrote:polarbear wrote:darlo reborn wrote:But why would the supporters want to carry on as there would be no team to watch !!!!
They could of gone home, why put the supporters through another ordeal just 4 days after the last one, I'm sure that was taken into account, as it would of been unfair on the supporters again
Yeah - supporters have just spent a few hours travelling down. I'm sure they'd be delighted to have to turnaround again for another wasted journey.
You talk of unfairness - what about the Boston fans, some of whom had travelled long distances to make the game? Hardly fair on them to back out because a few of your players were injured.
Ordeal?
They broke down on the side of motorway. It's hardly an ordeal.
Why are the two regular Spenny stalkers on this board both unbelievably stupid?
I believe as is the Spennymoor modus operandi, they are both ex-Darlo fans considered too stupid to remain Darlo fans, so were snapped up by Spennymoor.
And that's really saying something.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
On Sunday April 29, 2012 at 10:25 pm, Darlo Cockney wrote:Sadly some people have nothing better to do that invent rumours.
We will be playing at the arena again next season - fact.
Quakerz - if you actually attended games and spoke to people you might actually find our facts, rather than spreading s*** on this board.
DC
-
Spyman
- Posts: 12672
- Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 10:04 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
Post
by Spyman » Tue Aug 15, 2017 6:40 am
don'tbuythesun wrote:Have
Do you want to join them?
On Sunday April 29, 2012 at 10:25 pm, Darlo Cockney wrote:Sadly some people have nothing better to do that invent rumours.
We will be playing at the arena again next season - fact.
Quakerz - if you actually attended games and spoke to people you might actually find our facts, rather than spreading s*** on this board.
DC
-
D_F_C
- Posts: 2055
- Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2010 8:43 am
- Team Supported: Darlington
Post
by D_F_C » Tue Aug 15, 2017 12:20 pm
I don't see Spenny getting punished based on the fact that the referee was the one to call the match off. But I would ask Ainsley to explain why other avenues weren't looked at.
-
shawry
- Posts: 2600
- Joined: Sat Jul 11, 2009 4:55 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
Post
by shawry » Tue Aug 15, 2017 1:38 pm
D_F_C wrote:I don't see Spenny getting punished based on the fact that the referee was the one to call the match off. But I would ask Ainsley to explain why other avenues weren't looked at.
He couldn't do anything else if spenny weren't going to turn up though.
Much like the ref abandoned the Warrington game because they wouldn't continue.
Sent from my SM-G955F using Tapatalk
-
H1987
- Posts: 2095
- Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2016 4:14 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
Post
by H1987 » Tue Aug 15, 2017 1:48 pm
Referees have to call games off if a team is reduced to 7 players too. That doesn't mean the team that causes the abandonment isn't punished for it.
Even if the supporters bus was full, half of them could have been called cabs, and the team and equipment could have got on the bus. They could have accepted the offers of minibuses, they could have called their own. It all just gives the impression they didn't really fancy playing the game, and people will point to the injuries as why they might do this. I'm pretty sure there'll be a point deduction for it. Stupid thing to do on their behalf, i can't see the FA being remotely interested in the excuses.
-
OHDFC
- Posts: 379
- Joined: Fri Jul 17, 2009 1:22 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
Post
by OHDFC » Tue Aug 15, 2017 8:15 pm
don'tbuythesun wrote:I see H has his have's right!
Unlike your good self
Sent from my SM-G925F using Tapatalk
-
DaveMc
- Posts: 24
- Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2017 7:01 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
- Location: Durrington Wiltshire
Post
by DaveMc » Wed Aug 16, 2017 6:23 am
Boston game has been re-arranged pretty guick (22 August)
-
spen666
- Posts: 2298
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 9:12 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
Post
by spen666 » Wed Aug 16, 2017 6:39 am
DaveMc wrote:Boston game has been re-arranged pretty guick (22 August)
League rules require games to be rearranged within I think 4 weeks of original date.
-
polarbear
- Posts: 208
- Joined: Fri May 11, 2012 10:13 am
- Team Supported: spennymoor
Post
by polarbear » Wed Aug 16, 2017 9:08 am
Funny thing is, Hartlepool use the same coach company, so it could of been them, if Hartlepool had been away instead of us, god knows what your forum would of been like, if that had happened. Also Middlesbrough us the same company for their fans
-
lo36789
- Posts: 10976
- Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2011 10:58 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
Post
by lo36789 » Wed Aug 16, 2017 9:27 am
Yeh I know we'd have actually been biased, probably would have called for them to be relegated to the Northern league. Thing is Hartlepool are our rivals - at least with Spennymoor we have just been objective.
-
H1987
- Posts: 2095
- Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2016 4:14 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
Post
by H1987 » Wed Aug 16, 2017 9:38 am
Pools would probably have still made their game.
-
lo36789
- Posts: 10976
- Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2011 10:58 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
Post
by lo36789 » Wed Aug 16, 2017 9:46 am
Haha probs wish they hadn't though...