Page 1 of 1

Graeme Armstrong

Posted: Thu Sep 28, 2017 11:16 am
by Darlo_CR
He’s been made available for loan or permanent transfer.
Would you have him back? I certainly would!

Re: Graeme Armstrong

Posted: Thu Sep 28, 2017 11:18 am
by loan_star
Yes! Even if only on loan to cover for Beck while hes not fit.

Re: Graeme Armstrong

Posted: Thu Sep 28, 2017 12:12 pm
by dickdarlington
If he's been released by Spenny, perhaps he isn't cut out for this level? I'd be tempted to give him a chance though.

Re: Graeme Armstrong

Posted: Thu Sep 28, 2017 12:28 pm
by D_F_C
can't see it. I don't think he'd get a chance if all the strikers were fit. I don't think you could play him and Beck

Re: Graeme Armstrong

Posted: Thu Sep 28, 2017 12:31 pm
by Darlopartisan
I was very disappointed when he decided to leave but would welcome him back with open arms,I'll go and pick him up if he wants :D

Re: Graeme Armstrong

Posted: Thu Sep 28, 2017 1:04 pm
by broadsexile
http://www.darlofc.co.uk/forum/viewtopi ... =15&t=3818

(Having sarcastically posted a link to the 'I'd like him back, would you like him back' comedy thread of years gone by, I actually would like Graeme Armstrong back, at least for a bit.)

Re: Graeme Armstrong

Posted: Thu Sep 28, 2017 1:40 pm
by Spyman
broadsexile wrote:http://www.darlofc.co.uk/forum/viewtopi ... =15&t=3818

(Having sarcastically posted a link to the 'I'd like him back, would you like him back' comedy thread of years gone by, I actually would like Graeme Armstrong back, at least for a bit.)
A thread in which you said 'be careful what you wish for' in reference to a joke about playing Chorley every week......

Anyway, I'd have Armstrong back as cover for Beck

Re: Graeme Armstrong

Posted: Thu Sep 28, 2017 3:10 pm
by HarrytheQuaker
No

Sent from my SM-G928F using Tapatalk

Re: Graeme Armstrong

Posted: Thu Sep 28, 2017 3:32 pm
by My opinion
HarrytheQuaker wrote:No

Sent from my SM-G928F using Tapatalk
No from me as well.
I have a lot of time for Armstrong and he was very good for us. But, that was then and this is now...We are a division higher and he is two years older.
We should move on.

Re: Graeme Armstrong

Posted: Thu Sep 28, 2017 3:54 pm
by HarryCharltonsCat
I'd have him back as cover whilst Beck's injured, if only because I think he brought the best out of Cartman.

Re: Graeme Armstrong

Posted: Thu Sep 28, 2017 4:11 pm
by HarrytheQuaker
My opinion wrote:
HarrytheQuaker wrote:No

Sent from my SM-G928F using Tapatalk
No from me as well.
I have a lot of time for Armstrong and he was very good for us. But, that was then and this is now...We are a division higher and he is two years older.
We should move on.
My sentiments exactly

Sent from my SM-G928F using Tapatalk

Re: Graeme Armstrong

Posted: Thu Sep 28, 2017 4:49 pm
by quaker4life
HarrytheQuaker wrote:
My opinion wrote:
HarrytheQuaker wrote:No

Sent from my SM-G928F using Tapatalk
No from me as well.
I have a lot of time for Armstrong and he was very good for us. But, that was then and this is now...We are a division higher and he is two years older.
We should move on.
My sentiments exactly

Sent from my SM-G928F using Tapatalk
Mine also.

It's like crying for Amar and Mitch to come back as well, he was very good for us in the Pritt Stick League's but he wouldn't get a sniff ahead of Carts, Beck and Saunders now.

He left us on great terms lets leave it like that.

Re: Graeme Armstrong

Posted: Thu Sep 28, 2017 6:50 pm
by Beano
It would do us no harm to bring him in as short-term cover just to cover Beck.

A yes from me.

Re: Graeme Armstrong

Posted: Thu Sep 28, 2017 7:17 pm
by Quakerz
Dial B for Brodie.

8-)

Re: Graeme Armstrong

Posted: Thu Sep 28, 2017 9:22 pm
by Spyman
Quakerz wrote:Dial B for Brodie.

8-)
Dial n for no

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

Re: Graeme Armstrong

Posted: Thu Sep 28, 2017 10:11 pm
by moz1963
HarryCharltonsCat wrote:I'd have him back as cover whilst Beck's injured, if only because I think he brought the best out of Cartman.
My thoughts exactly

Re: Graeme Armstrong

Posted: Thu Sep 28, 2017 11:30 pm
by HarryCharltonsCat
quaker4life wrote:
HarrytheQuaker wrote:
My opinion wrote:
HarrytheQuaker wrote:No

Sent from my SM-G928F using Tapatalk
No from me as well.
I have a lot of time for Armstrong and he was very good for us. But, that was then and this is now...We are a division higher and he is two years older.
We should move on.
My sentiments exactly

Sent from my SM-G928F using Tapatalk
Mine also.

It's like crying for Amar and Mitch to come back as well, he was very good for us in the Pritt Stick League's but he wouldn't get a sniff ahead of Carts, Beck and Saunders now.

He left us on great terms lets leave it like that.
Well seeing as Carts was shunted off to Farsley on loan, why should Armstrong struggle anymore than him?

Re: Graeme Armstrong

Posted: Thu Sep 28, 2017 11:41 pm
by Darlogramps
I'd say no also.

1. It's a higher league and he's a bit older. It stands to reason he's on a downward curve as a player- no disrespect intended.

2. If he isn't good enough for Spenny's first team, he isn't good enough for ours.

Re: Graeme Armstrong

Posted: Fri Sep 29, 2017 1:42 am
by quaker4life
HarryCharltonsCat wrote:
quaker4life wrote:
HarrytheQuaker wrote:
My opinion wrote:
HarrytheQuaker wrote:
Well seeing as Carts was shunted off to Farsley on loan, why should Armstrong struggle anymore than him?
Only because of Fenwick and he turned out to be a waste of space.

Pointless crying crocodile tears over former players.

Re: Graeme Armstrong

Posted: Fri Sep 29, 2017 7:58 am
by HarryCharltonsCat
No-ones crying over it. Happen to think he would do ok for us short-term. We know he fits our style of play, and Cartman arguably played his best football for us alongside him. As for Spennymoor, I don't think their style suits him.

I won't lose sleep over him not returning - he won't, I know.

Re: Graeme Armstrong

Posted: Fri Sep 29, 2017 8:26 am
by theoriginalfatcat
Spyman wrote:
Quakerz wrote:Dial B for Brodie.

8-)
Dial n for no

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

Dial F.O. for ............

Re: Graeme Armstrong

Posted: Fri Sep 29, 2017 11:26 am
by MKDarlo
I would take him back as short term cover for Beck. We play in a style that needs a target man.

If he turns out to be superb sign him on. If not thank him for helping us out.

EDIT - then i read the thread below this one and see we have singed a Portuguese forward.

Re: Graeme Armstrong

Posted: Fri Sep 29, 2017 11:40 am
by Spyman
theoriginalfatcat wrote:
Spyman wrote:
Quakerz wrote:Dial B for Brodie.

8-)
Dial n for no

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

Dial F.O. for ............
:lol:

Re: Graeme Armstrong

Posted: Fri Sep 29, 2017 2:06 pm
by Darlogramps
MKDarlo wrote: we have singed a Portuguese forward.
That's one weird initiation ceremony.

Re: Graeme Armstrong

Posted: Fri Sep 29, 2017 4:28 pm
by don'tbuythesun
Maybe it's a bit like a Brazilian?

Re: Graeme Armstrong

Posted: Sat Sep 30, 2017 7:07 am
by jjljks
don'tbuythesun wrote:Maybe it's a bit like a Brazilian?
Some bald twat we have not seen? ;)