Nathan Cartman
Nathan Cartman
Leaving the club after just under 3 years. fantastic servant to the club and wish him well in the remainder of his career.
https://twitter.com/ncartman1/status/931832729158766593
https://twitter.com/ncartman1/status/931832729158766593
-
- Posts: 1889
- Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2012 11:36 am
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: Nathan Cartman
Never seems right to me that something like this breaks on social media before been announced by the club, guess that's the world we live in now.
Anyway good luck to Cartman he's been great for the club
Anyway good luck to Cartman he's been great for the club
Help get the club back to Darlo by helping to spread the word about the "Back to Darlo!" fund. The image on the right will be constantly updated with the latest total so please feel free to use the image link below the thermometer on your own signatures, blogs, websites, etc. | Image link: http://www.mydarlo.co.uk/img/BTD-therm-350x100.jpg |
-
- Posts: 12155
- Joined: Sat Jul 25, 2009 3:08 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
- Location: Darlington
Re: Nathan Cartman
Good luck Carts; thanks for the memories.
Re: Nathan Cartman
Best of luck to him - played an important role in 2 promotions
-
- Posts: 14122
- Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 10:13 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: Nathan Cartman
Thanks Nathan for all you've done, hope you have similar success at your new club.
-
- Posts: 1889
- Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2012 11:36 am
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: Nathan Cartman
Gone to Farsley
Help get the club back to Darlo by helping to spread the word about the "Back to Darlo!" fund. The image on the right will be constantly updated with the latest total so please feel free to use the image link below the thermometer on your own signatures, blogs, websites, etc. | Image link: http://www.mydarlo.co.uk/img/BTD-therm-350x100.jpg |
-
- Posts: 5748
- Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2010 1:44 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: Nathan Cartman
Five-figure sum according to the Echo.
-
- Posts: 14122
- Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 10:13 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: Nathan Cartman
Have to admit that I'm surprised he would command such a transfer fee. Good business for the club.Darlofan97 wrote:Five-figure sum according to the Echo.
-
- Posts: 2803
- Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2009 7:54 am
- Team Supported: Darlington
- Location: A Swimming Pool (usually).
Re: Nathan Cartman
I have to agree!Darlo_Pete wrote:Have to admit that I'm surprised he would command such a transfer fee. Good business for the club.Darlofan97 wrote:Five-figure sum according to the Echo.
Sad to see him go though, cracking lad
Re: Nathan Cartman
Why? We paid a 5 figure sum for him.Darlo_Pete wrote:Have to admit that I'm surprised he would command such a transfer fee. Good business for the club.Darlofan97 wrote:Five-figure sum according to the Echo.
For you to insult me, I must first value your opinion.
Re: Nathan Cartman
At the time he had around 30 goals to his name in one season. He hasn't been as prolific since and in the last year has only got a handful of goals. 5 figures is good business on current form. Best of luck to him anyway, hope he finds his form again and we see him back at Darlo in the future with his new team. As long as it doesn't mean we have dropped a league.Ingleby wrote:Why? We paid a 5 figure sum for him.Darlo_Pete wrote:Have to admit that I'm surprised he would command such a transfer fee. Good business for the club.Darlofan97 wrote:Five-figure sum according to the Echo.
Re: Nathan Cartman
Popular player one of many who over the years have done their bit and then reached their level.
Good luck to him at Farsley.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Good luck to him at Farsley.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
On Sunday April 29, 2012 at 10:25 pm, Darlo Cockney wrote:Sadly some people have nothing better to do that invent rumours.
We will be playing at the arena again next season - fact.
Quakerz - if you actually attended games and spoke to people you might actually find our facts, rather than spreading s*** on this board.
DC
Re: Nathan Cartman
Scores for Farsley after 7 mins.....
Come back Nathan
Come back Nathan
Re: Nathan Cartman
Or maybe we could drop to that level next season and he can score for us then?leedscol wrote:Scores for Farsley after 7 mins.....
Come back Nathan
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
On Sunday April 29, 2012 at 10:25 pm, Darlo Cockney wrote:Sadly some people have nothing better to do that invent rumours.
We will be playing at the arena again next season - fact.
Quakerz - if you actually attended games and spoke to people you might actually find our facts, rather than spreading s*** on this board.
DC
-
- Posts: 14122
- Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 10:13 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: Nathan Cartman
Because he's 2 or 3 years older and hasn't got a great scoring record this season.Ingleby wrote:Why? We paid a 5 figure sum for him.Darlo_Pete wrote:Have to admit that I'm surprised he would command such a transfer fee. Good business for the club.Darlofan97 wrote:Five-figure sum according to the Echo.
Re: Nathan Cartman
Carts always gave 100% and only wants to play every match so can understand why he went. Given the recent lack f support or chances, no wonder he moved on. Glad we got our money in transfer fees and not pie crust Gray promises. Carts is a good player & been a great servant to this club. Hope he continues to enjoy football with Farsley! Thanks Nathan
-
- Posts: 1164
- Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2009 2:06 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
- Location: Newton Aycliffe
Re: Nathan Cartman
It's an annoying situation that we have had to bin Cartman to be able to bring in Styche. I believe Cartman would have been fine at this level but Beck was a different player to Armstrong the season before and didn't really work as a partnership. He has then been asked to play pretty much as a lone striker for the majority of this season, again not going to bring the best out of him. It's a shame that we weren't in a position to trial Styche and Cartman as a pairing but guess we are not in a financial position to have that luxury.
"The world ain't all sunshine and rainbows. It is a very mean and nasty place and it will beat you to your knees and keep you there permanently if you let it. You, me, or nobody is gonna hit as hard as life. But it ain't how hard you hit; it's about how hard you can get hit, and keep moving forward. How much you can take, and keep moving forward. That's how winning is done!"
- HarrytheQuaker
- Posts: 3148
- Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 3:57 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: Nathan Cartman
Cartman will score in the league below fact, just not quite good enough in this leaguereal_darlo_85 wrote:It's an annoying situation that we have had to bin Cartman to be able to bring in Styche. I believe Cartman would have been fine at this level but Beck was a different player to Armstrong the season before and didn't really work as a partnership. He has then been asked to play pretty much as a lone striker for the majority of this season, again not going to bring the best out of him. It's a shame that we weren't in a position to trial Styche and Cartman as a pairing but guess we are not in a financial position to have that luxury.
-
- Posts: 276
- Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2009 9:14 am
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: Nathan Cartman
[/quote]Cartman will score in the league below fact, just not quite good enough in this league[/quote]
There's a good chance we will find out if you are right next season. I doubt Farsley bought him with just this season in mind.
There's a good chance we will find out if you are right next season. I doubt Farsley bought him with just this season in mind.
Re: Nathan Cartman
Wish him all the best, but i'm glad the management are working within the budget they've been set, and it's clearly been Cartman out for Styche coming in. You can't argue Styche isn't an improvement, and it shows what sort of team we can put together whilst staying inside the budget. We don't need 5 strikers on the books, as seemed to be Grays obsession, to build a good side.
Re: Nathan Cartman
Wasn't it Beck out for Styche coming in? Also how can you/we be sure yet that he "is an improvement"?H1987 wrote:Wish him all the best, but i'm glad the management are working within the budget they've been set, and it's clearly been Cartman out for Styche coming in. You can't argue Styche isn't an improvement, and it shows what sort of team we can put together whilst staying inside the budget. We don't need 5 strikers on the books, as seemed to be Grays obsession, to build a good side.
Re: Nathan Cartman
Because he's scored more goals than Cartman at this level (10 to 1 this season), and he has spent most of his career the next division up and has a decent record at that level too.bga wrote:Wasn't it Beck out for Styche coming in? Also how can you/we be sure yet that he "is an improvement"?H1987 wrote:Wish him all the best, but i'm glad the management are working within the budget they've been set, and it's clearly been Cartman out for Styche coming in. You can't argue Styche isn't an improvement, and it shows what sort of team we can put together whilst staying inside the budget. We don't need 5 strikers on the books, as seemed to be Grays obsession, to build a good side.
Think that just about covers it.
Re: Nathan Cartman
I really hope you are right, but I would prefer to judge whether he is an improvement by what he produces from now on, not based on the past. That was my point!Quakerz wrote:Because he's scored more goals than Cartman at this level (10 to 1 this season), and he has spent most of his career the next division up and has a decent record at that level too.bga wrote:Wasn't it Beck out for Styche coming in? Also how can you/we be sure yet that he "is an improvement"?H1987 wrote:Wish him all the best, but i'm glad the management are working within the budget they've been set, and it's clearly been Cartman out for Styche coming in. You can't argue Styche isn't an improvement, and it shows what sort of team we can put together whilst staying inside the budget. We don't need 5 strikers on the books, as seemed to be Grays obsession, to build a good side.
Think that just about covers it.
Re: Nathan Cartman
Oh and by the way I still maintain he is replacing Beck not Cartman isn't he, so this is a pointless discussion!
Re: Nathan Cartman
Cartman hasn't produced for 18 months at least. You judge him based on his past yet say Styches past counts for nothingbga wrote: I really hope you are right, but I would prefer to judge whether he is an improvement by what he produces from now on, not based on the past. That was my point!
Re: Nathan Cartman
Quite right, loan_star!loan_star wrote:Cartman hasn't produced for 18 months at least. You judge him based on his past yet say Styches past counts for nothingbga wrote: I really hope you are right, but I would prefer to judge whether he is an improvement by what he produces from now on, not based on the past. That was my point!
However, I agree with bga that Styche is a replacement for Beck, and add that the real replacement for Cartman is Saunders.
Caton, if retained, will likely end up occupying one of the wide forward roles on offer.
Re: Nathan Cartman
Think I have confused myself here! But if we agree Styche is a replacement for Beck how many goals does he have to score for us this season, to be an improvement on Beck!Beano wrote:Quite right, loan_star!loan_star wrote:Cartman hasn't produced for 18 months at least. You judge him based on his past yet say Styches past counts for nothingbga wrote: I really hope you are right, but I would prefer to judge whether he is an improvement by what he produces from now on, not based on the past. That was my point!
However, I agree with bga that Styche is a replacement for Beck, and add that the real replacement for Cartman is Saunders.
Caton, if retained, will likely end up occupying one of the wide forward roles on offer.
-
- Posts: 14122
- Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 10:13 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: Nathan Cartman
Only about 5, given Beck's poor performance this season.bga wrote:Think I have confused myself here! But if we agree Styche is a replacement for Beck how many goals does he have to score for us this season, to be an improvement on Beck!Beano wrote:Quite right, loan_star!loan_star wrote:Cartman hasn't produced for 18 months at least. You judge him based on his past yet say Styches past counts for nothingbga wrote: I really hope you are right, but I would prefer to judge whether he is an improvement by what he produces from now on, not based on the past. That was my point!
However, I agree with bga that Styche is a replacement for Beck, and add that the real replacement for Cartman is Saunders.
Caton, if retained, will likely end up occupying one of the wide forward roles on offer.