You are here: darlofc.co.uk » Board index » The Uncovered Forums » Virtual Feethams
It is currently Mon Jul 16, 2018 4:06 pm View unanswered posts | View active topics



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 70 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Gateshead
PostPosted: Thu Jun 14, 2018 12:20 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2009 12:28 pm
Posts: 377
Team Supported: Darlington
shildonlad wrote:
I bet Darlington whish they had owners like the bennots, who have at least tried and are like Steve Gibson into the fact they are fans. Not a good situation but as Richard bennots said in a interview he could have folded the club and walked away and who could have blamed him. His continued involvement keeps the way open for another owner which he personally is actively seeking. I guess it also gives time for a long shot of fan ownership. Can't see why some certain smart acres on this thread want the club out of business. Wouldn't it be good for the north east to have Darlington, Gateshead, Hartlepool and York in league two some great derbys

Sent from my Lenovo TAB 2 A10-70F using Tapatalk


As Gateshead fans waved 20 pound notes at us when we were in administration. I am a bitter person and wouldn't bat an eyelid if Gateshead folded.

_________________
Craig Liddle is God!!


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Gateshead
PostPosted: Thu Jun 14, 2018 12:27 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jul 11, 2009 6:32 pm
Posts: 20906
Team Supported: Darlington
shildonlad wrote:
Jesus spen666 just asked a question why all the abuse against him.


I can't even be arsed to explain but lets just say that there are many reasons.

We just don't randomly abuse strangers on this board - have you been abused for example?

Stay out of the Spen thing because you don't know the history.

_________________
Image

“Everybody knows where that club is going now, so I’m out of the way. They can carry on, it’s their club, they can keep it." - Raj Singh, 2017


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Gateshead
PostPosted: Thu Jun 14, 2018 12:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 16, 2009 9:01 am
Posts: 5639
Team Supported: Darlington
Quakerz wrote:
shildonlad wrote:
Jesus spen666 just asked a question why all the abuse against him.


I can't even be arsed to explain but lets just say that there are many reasons.

We just don't randomly abuse strangers on this board - have you been abused for example?

Stay out of the Spen thing because you don't know the history.


Always said he should have been banned off here ages ago. One face for here and another for facebook where he is always having a pop at us.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Gateshead
PostPosted: Thu Jun 14, 2018 12:55 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2013 8:59 pm
Posts: 463
Location: Hereford
Team Supported: Darlington
loan_star wrote:
Quakerz wrote:
shildonlad wrote:
Jesus spen666 just asked a question why all the abuse against him.


I can't even be arsed to explain but lets just say that there are many reasons.

We just don't randomly abuse strangers on this board - have you been abused for example?

Stay out of the Spen thing because you don't know the history.


Always said he should have been banned off here ages ago. One face for here and another for facebook where he is always having a pop at us.


Forget all the "in house banter", spen666 is a true hypocrite.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Gateshead
PostPosted: Thu Jun 14, 2018 6:55 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon May 07, 2012 9:53 pm
Posts: 66
Location: Luton
Team Supported: Newcastle united
Yes folks i dont know the history with spen666 whoever he is, nowt against him myself but its sad to see any thread turn into a personal vendetta between board members whoevers on the right or wrong

Sent from my LG-H850 using Tapatalk


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Gateshead
PostPosted: Thu Jun 14, 2018 6:56 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon May 07, 2012 9:53 pm
Posts: 66
Location: Luton
Team Supported: Newcastle united
darlo_baron wrote:
shildonlad wrote:
I bet Darlington whish they had owners like the bennots, who have at least tried and are like Steve Gibson into the fact they are fans. Not a good situation but as Richard bennots said in a interview he could have folded the club and walked away and who could have blamed him. His continued involvement keeps the way open for another owner which he personally is actively seeking. I guess it also gives time for a long shot of fan ownership. Can't see why some certain smart acres on this thread want the club out of business. Wouldn't it be good for the north east to have Darlington, Gateshead, Hartlepool and York in league two some great derbys

Sent from my Lenovo TAB 2 A10-70F using Tapatalk


As Gateshead fans waved 20 pound notes at us when we were in administration. I am a bitter person and wouldn't bat an eyelid if Gateshead folded.
Not me infact i was liveing in luton at the time, even saw yous down there during that final season of the old club

Sent from my LG-H850 using Tapatalk


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Gateshead
PostPosted: Thu Jun 14, 2018 7:13 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 02, 2015 9:31 am
Posts: 457
Team Supported: Darlington
Quakerz wrote:
shildonlad wrote:
Jesus spen666 just asked a question why all the abuse against him.


I can't even be arsed to explain but lets just say that there are many reasons.

We just don't randomly abuse strangers on this board - have you been abused for example?

Stay out of the Spen thing because you don't know the history.

He hasn’t been abused yet but if he carries on using terms like”the old club”it won’t be long in coming. :shh:


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Gateshead
PostPosted: Thu Jun 14, 2018 10:14 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon May 07, 2012 9:53 pm
Posts: 66
Location: Luton
Team Supported: Newcastle united
Emdubya wrote:
Quakerz wrote:
shildonlad wrote:
Jesus spen666 just asked a question why all the abuse against him.


I can't even be arsed to explain but lets just say that there are many reasons.

We just don't randomly abuse strangers on this board - have you been abused for example?

Stay out of the Spen thing because you don't know the history.

He hasn’t been abused yet but if he carries on using terms like”the old club”it won’t be long in coming. :shh:
Alright should have said the club whilst singh was chairman

Sent from my LG-H850 using Tapatalk


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Gateshead
PostPosted: Fri Jun 15, 2018 5:48 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2009 12:23 pm
Posts: 1706
Team Supported: Darlington
Darlogramps wrote:
Comfortably_numb wrote:
Darlogramps wrote:
quakerman wrote:
Trike1 wrote:
they can have caton to start them off [emoji38]

Totally uncalled for, just back off for God’s sake.Pea brain.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
As much as you might not like the comment, your name calling is completely uncalled for and totally out of order. It also makes you a hypocrite, as you pulled me up on a similar thing.

Trike's comment was clearly intended as a joke, so the witch hunt that's been started is unnecessary and pathetic. Take it for what it is or ignore it.

Given that Comfortably_Numb, loan_star, dfcdfcdfc and Darlo_Pete were very quick to condemn me for something similar (the infamous "moron" comment), I'm expecting them to be equally as faux-outraged about this instance of namecalling. Otherwise they're all hypocrites.

But if people want to talk about Caton, he had two decent performances and contributed very little in the rest. He'd have been released if he'd been on a one-year deal. When the overwhelming majority of his performances have been ineffectual, it speaks volumes about his ability. A mediocre signing.


er....not sure if I'd say your 'moron' comment was infamous DG. Maradona handling the ball v England in the WC - that's infamous.

anyway - as I said to you before, the faux outage of your use of the word moron was more off the back of shock and surprise at you straying from your usual eloquence.

so basically, you're not allowed to resort to such language - but others are....a consequence of setting your own bar so high it seems :)


In fairness, you were saying generally that abuse is wrong in that. So failing to criticise Quakerman for doing the same thing is hypocritical. My point is there's double-standards being demonstrated.

But at least your response is more light-hearted than some of the cry-bully responses we've had.


Fair play


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Gateshead
PostPosted: Fri Jun 15, 2018 7:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2010 12:24 pm
Posts: 1170
Team Supported: Darlington
Looks like Southport are staying full time too.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 70 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Makka Pakka and 28 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group