Page 1 of 2

Vaulks on loan to Whitby

Posted: Fri Aug 24, 2018 6:59 pm
by Darlogramps
As above.

Clearly not in TW's immediate plans. With Collins dropped it suggests Burn and Galbraith will be first choice centre backs going forward.

Re: Vaulks on loan to Whitby

Posted: Fri Aug 24, 2018 8:10 pm
by Darlo_Pete
Sorry to hear that news. Vaulks has never let us down when he's played for us. Hope he does well at Whitby and comes back to us an even better player than he already is. Having said that I think game time is exactly what he needs at the moment, rather than keeping the bench warm.

Re: Vaulks on loan to Whitby

Posted: Fri Aug 24, 2018 8:19 pm
by Vodka_Vic
Only reason is lack of the reserves this year. TW said this was what would happen to squad players. Will be in when injuries allow I'm sure.

Re: Vaulks on loan to Whitby

Posted: Fri Aug 24, 2018 9:46 pm
by dickdarlington
I think this is a positive move. Giving him some proper game time at a decent level. I’ve been impressed in what I’ve seen so far. But he’s still very young. I fully expect him to be a mainstay at centre half next season. And then to move up the leagues not long after that. But he needs time. Vaulks is the next Heaton, we can all see it. But dropping him into the defence at the moment would do neither him, nor the club as a whole benefit. His time will come.

Re: Vaulks on loan to Whitby

Posted: Sat Aug 25, 2018 4:10 am
by jjljks
The lad needs a run out to develop his game. Good luck & stay injury free in case we need him back :clap:

Re: Vaulks on loan to Whitby

Posted: Sat Aug 25, 2018 1:31 pm
by JE93
Starts today for Whitby against Witton Albion. Good to see him straight into the starting line up.

Re: Vaulks on loan to Whitby

Posted: Sat Aug 25, 2018 5:13 pm
by Quakerz
Think we're going to have to recall him with Galbraith injured and Collins "injured".

Re: Vaulks on loan to Whitby

Posted: Sat Aug 25, 2018 5:16 pm
by LoidLucan
Don't they have to go for at least a month?

Re: Vaulks on loan to Whitby

Posted: Sat Aug 25, 2018 5:37 pm
by banktopp
Quakerz wrote:Think we're going to have to recall him with Galbraith injured and Collins "injured".
Can't Ainge play at CB

Re: Vaulks on loan to Whitby

Posted: Sat Aug 25, 2018 6:06 pm
by HarrytheQuaker
banktopp wrote:
Quakerz wrote:Think we're going to have to recall him with Galbraith injured and Collins "injured".
Can't Ainge play at CB
He did 2nd half

Re: Vaulks on loan to Whitby

Posted: Sat Aug 25, 2018 6:47 pm
by jjljks
Vaulks is needed back at CB now! Our need is greater than Whitby, though probably why TW chose to say Collins was 'injured'.

Re: Vaulks on loan to Whitby

Posted: Sun Aug 26, 2018 7:52 am
by Darlo_Pete
Hope we had an something written into the loan deal, that he could come back if we had an emergency?

Re: Vaulks on loan to Whitby

Posted: Sun Aug 26, 2018 2:44 pm
by petenita
jjljks wrote:Vaulks is needed back at CB now! Our need is greater than Whitby, though probably why TW chose to say Collins was 'injured'.
I noticed that Collins was struggling to run at the end of the first half, so I don’t doubt that he was injured

Re: Vaulks on loan to Whitby

Posted: Sun Aug 26, 2018 5:28 pm
by Vodka_Vic
AW in his post-match interview said that Ainge would be playing centre half for the time being. Failing that they would be bringing someone in. I Don't understand this as I thought we would be using our 'squad'. We all said Vaulks would be needed at some point. Well now he is, but he's playing for Whitby. Some puzzling stuff going on.

Re: Vaulks on loan to Whitby

Posted: Sun Aug 26, 2018 5:33 pm
by dfc4me
I'm pretty sure you can't recall loan players in the first month. He needed match time and no one would of anticipated Galbraith and Collins both being injured on Saturday.

Re: Vaulks on loan to Whitby

Posted: Mon Aug 27, 2018 6:38 am
by joejaques
So, with Styche going away for Gibraltar, how are we giong to line up next week? :roll:

Re: Vaulks on loan to Whitby

Posted: Tue Aug 28, 2018 7:33 am
by jjljks
Can we swap Collins for Vaulks?

Re: Vaulks on loan to Whitby

Posted: Tue Aug 28, 2018 7:41 am
by divas
6.6.2 Short Term Loan Transfers – A Club can have up to a maximum of twelve (12) Short Term Loans during a Playing Season. The minimum period of a Short Term Loan transfer must be twenty-eight (28) days with a maximum period to the end of the Playing Season.
The Competition shall not approve more than two (2) Short Term Loan transfers to or from any one Club, including Premier League and Football League Clubs, at any one time.
On completing the National League System Temporary Transfer Form or FA form H3, a Club must send the original to the FA, one copy to the Company, and a third copy to the secretary of the League with which the player is registered.
To extend the period of any Short Term Loan transfer a further National League System Temporary Transfer Form or FA form H3 must be completed and copies sent as directed above. If the Short Term Loan transfer is extended only the Club for whom the Player was originally registered will be allowed to cancel the agreement at any time within the extension period, i.e. after 28 days. In the case of a goalkeeper Clubs may mutually agree, if they so wish, to include a recall clause in the agreement to enable the Club for who the Player was originally registered to recall the Player at any time during the loan period. Players other than goalkeepers may not be recalled within the first month, i.e. 28 days, of any loan.

Re: Vaulks on loan to Whitby

Posted: Tue Aug 28, 2018 7:55 am
by jjljks
divas wrote:6.6.2 Short Term Loan Transfers – A Club can have up to a maximum of twelve (12) Short Term Loans during a Playing Season. The minimum period of a Short Term Loan transfer must be twenty-eight (28) days with a maximum period to the end of the Playing Season.
The Competition shall not approve more than two (2) Short Term Loan transfers to or from any one Club, including Premier League and Football League Clubs, at any one time.
On completing the National League System Temporary Transfer Form or FA form H3, a Club must send the original to the FA, one copy to the Company, and a third copy to the secretary of the League with which the player is registered.
To extend the period of any Short Term Loan transfer a further National League System Temporary Transfer Form or FA form H3 must be completed and copies sent as directed above. If the Short Term Loan transfer is extended only the Club for whom the Player was originally registered will be allowed to cancel the agreement at any time within the extension period, i.e. after 28 days. In the case of a goalkeeper Clubs may mutually agree, if they so wish, to include a recall clause in the agreement to enable the Club for who the Player was originally registered to recall the Player at any time during the loan period. Players other than goalkeepers may not be recalled within the first month, i.e. 28 days, of any loan.
Is that a "no" then?

Re: Vaulks on loan to Whitby

Posted: Thu Aug 30, 2018 9:19 am
by Nigel Batches Beard
Vodka_Vic wrote:Only reason is lack of the reserves this year. TW said this was what would happen to squad players. Will be in when injuries allow I'm sure.
playing on loan at Whitby probably will bring him on

playing at Wearside League Level where the reserves were - apart from fitness, probably not

Re: Vaulks on loan to Whitby

Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2018 5:34 pm
by Darlo_Pete
So is that official that he has to have been at Whitby a month before we can recall him and if that is the case when will the month be up?

Re: Vaulks on loan to Whitby

Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2018 5:41 pm
by LoidLucan
Looks like an unused sub again today. You couldn't make it up when we are down to the bare bones.

Re: Vaulks on loan to Whitby

Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2018 6:02 pm
by The Golden Hairclip
While we’re talking about Whitby. Dale Hopson was available in the summer and went to Whitby. One we missed perhaps.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Re: Vaulks on loan to Whitby

Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2018 6:40 pm
by biccynana
Darlo_Pete wrote:when will the month be up?
28 days from the 24th Aug.

Re: Vaulks on loan to Whitby

Posted: Mon Sep 03, 2018 9:37 pm
by Darlo_Pete
biccynana wrote:
Darlo_Pete wrote:when will the month be up?
28 days from the 24th Aug.
Cheers for that. So it's a while before we can get him back. Can't see the point of him being at Whitby if he can't get on the pitch.

Re: Vaulks on loan to Whitby

Posted: Wed Sep 05, 2018 8:52 am
by LoidLucan
Unused sub again for Whitby last night. He will be getting very little benefit from this stint at Whitby if this keeps up. Perhaps Chris Hardy doesn't want to change things too much as they are doing well this season in seventh place.

Re: Vaulks on loan to Whitby

Posted: Wed Sep 05, 2018 9:01 am
by theoriginalfatcat
I can't see who is getting any benefit with this deal - DFC/Vaulks/Whitby?

Re: Vaulks on loan to Whitby

Posted: Wed Sep 05, 2018 10:02 am
by banktopp
theoriginalfatcat wrote:I can't see who is getting any benefit with this deal - DFC/Vaulks/Whitby?
Perhaps Whitby just took him as cover in case of injuries / suspensions to regulars.
Something which did not occur to DFC.

Re: Vaulks on loan to Whitby

Posted: Wed Sep 05, 2018 11:13 am
by dickdarlington
Has anyone considered that he might not be good enough yet? If he's not getting into the Whitby team, what makes him more suited to play in the division above?

He has looked alright when we have seen him, but those glimpses have been sporadic. We don't know what he's like in training and so on.

Re: Vaulks on loan to Whitby

Posted: Wed Sep 05, 2018 6:14 pm
by bga
theoriginalfatcat wrote:I can't see who is getting any benefit with this deal - DFC/Vaulks/Whitby?
Surely there has to be some financial advantage to us in that Whitby must be paying a percentage of his wages even if a small amount? What puzzles me about this is what the two clubs agree formally or informally between each other. The length of loan and financials (as above) have to be documented you would hope. But what of the Footballing side of things, surely TW would have only let him go on the understanding he would get a certain amount of game time, and whilst this might not be guaranteed maybe Whitby have had a change of heart having seen him in training etc? Maybe a Gentleman's agreement that has backfired on TW? I suppose having some of his wages paid is at least something!