Useless Sacks of Shite.
- BishopQuaker
- Posts: 4497
- Joined: Sat Jul 11, 2009 1:48 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
Useless Sacks of Shite.
3-2 from 2-0 up.
Well that confirms that we're utterly shite.
If we manage to get ove 1,500 fans for the next few home games I'll be astounded.
Should we somehow score after I post this I stand by what I've said.
Well that confirms that we're utterly shite.
If we manage to get ove 1,500 fans for the next few home games I'll be astounded.
Should we somehow score after I post this I stand by what I've said.
- Darlo_Fanatic
- Posts: 1348
- Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2009 4:17 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
- Location: Carlisle
Re: Useless Sacks of sh**e.
How the fuck have there managed this, totally unacceptable.
DARLO FANATIC
Supporting DARLO might be a heartache but it's a heartache I chose to have.
Supporting DARLO might be a heartache but it's a heartache I chose to have.
Re: Useless Sacks of sh**e.
I just cannot b@stard believe this.
We're completely shot, far too fragile. We're already down but I just hope this doesn't now trigger a load more of the hidings we were getting before christmas.
We're completely shot, far too fragile. We're already down but I just hope this doesn't now trigger a load more of the hidings we were getting before christmas.
Re: Useless Sacks of sh**e.
10 minutes of madness ruined a good performance.
- nick_darlo
- Posts: 77
- Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 6:52 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: Useless Sacks of sh**e.
If anyone is to take the blame today it's Staunton. Stupid substitutions in areas we didn't need changing. Just as he messed up by fiddling around with the team selection at Morecambe his tinkering undid us again today. We were coasting. Pathetic.
- BishopQuaker
- Posts: 4497
- Joined: Sat Jul 11, 2009 1:48 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: Useless Sacks of sh**e.
Sorry nick but you don't go two down in about 4 minutes just because of a substitution.
If you're a professional footballer you should be able to cope.
If you're a professional footballer you should be able to cope.
- nick_darlo
- Posts: 77
- Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 6:52 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: Useless Sacks of sh**e.
Dempsey off...Chesterfield come into it. Groves on for Mulligan...down the other end and score two. Not rocket science. If he was going to bring anyone on it should have been Smith for Gray to give us a bit more stability. It was the best team performance of the season for the first 70 minutes today. Had we kept things the same we'd have easily won.
- RUMPLESTILTSKIN
- Posts: 1688
- Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2009 1:57 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
- Location: In my own little world
Re: Useless Sacks of sh**e.
Problem is Nick, we will never know. It's all a matter of opinion. Teams have thrown away a 2 goal lead before after making substitutions and after not making substitutions.
C'est La Vie
C'est La Vie
In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is King
Re: Useless Sacks of sh**e.
This is one of those "you had to be there otherwise you won't believe me" moments but that was just a freakish comeback by Chesterfield and no way on Gods earth did we deserve to lose. We were well in command, looked a good team and really could have been more than 2 up, and thoroughly deserved it.fat tony wrote:I just cannot b@stard believe this.
We're completely shot, far too fragile. We're already down but I just hope this doesn't now trigger a load more of the hidings we were getting before christmas.
There are millions of positives from that performance once I get the defeat out of my system.
Re: Useless Sacks of sh**e.
Gray was fooked and had to come off. he should have brought Jeff Smith on as a straight swap maybe, but maybe Smith is carrying a knock and with us winning 2-0 he maybe thought no point risking him, stick Groves on instead.nick_darlo wrote:If anyone is to take the blame today it's Staunton. Stupid substitutions in areas we didn't need changing. Just as he messed up by fiddling around with the team selection at Morecambe his tinkering undid us again today. We were coasting. Pathetic.
Re: Useless Sacks of sh**e.
were any of you at the game today, or were you sat playing with yourselves at your computers.
Chesterfield were never in the game until they brought Whaley on with 15 to go, but we should have been out of sight by then.
There first and second goals were outstanding, only critisism was Byrne should of put more on it when we went for the original header. For 80 minutes we were outstanding today, I believe we are already down but if we can keep Purcell and a few others we will be challenging in the Conference.
Chesterfield were never in the game until they brought Whaley on with 15 to go, but we should have been out of sight by then.
There first and second goals were outstanding, only critisism was Byrne should of put more on it when we went for the original header. For 80 minutes we were outstanding today, I believe we are already down but if we can keep Purcell and a few others we will be challenging in the Conference.
Re: Useless Sacks of sh**e.
No one can blame Staunton today. The subs that 'didn't need to be made' did. Dempsey was clearly getting tired therefore he did a pretty much like for like switch with Gary Smith. Ok he was having a good game but that certainly didn't cost us the match. Same with Mulligan he had just pulled up a bit 5 minutes before.
It was just the same old story as far as I'm concerned. Played well, deserved a win let alone a draw but ended up with nowt. As the saying goes when you're down...you're down and I think that was the case today. 2 goals that we could have done very little about, the third I didn't really see clearly as the box was pretty packed.
Worrying thing for me though is that when our heads are down we look like a completely different team. Start hoofing the ball in the air etc. rather than play the short game which we've been playing pretty well.
It was just the same old story as far as I'm concerned. Played well, deserved a win let alone a draw but ended up with nowt. As the saying goes when you're down...you're down and I think that was the case today. 2 goals that we could have done very little about, the third I didn't really see clearly as the box was pretty packed.
Worrying thing for me though is that when our heads are down we look like a completely different team. Start hoofing the ball in the air etc. rather than play the short game which we've been playing pretty well.
Re: Useless Sacks of sh**e.
Just got in and can't believe what I read here if you actually went to the game you would know what a tit you are with comments such as this.BishopQuaker wrote:3-2 from 2-0 up.
Well that confirms that we're utterly sh**e.
If we manage to get ove 1,500 fans for the next few home games I'll be astounded.
Should we somehow score after I post this I stand by what I've said.
-
- Posts: 647
- Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2009 4:08 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: Useless Sacks of sh**e.
thought they played excellent - unlucky not to have been out of sight.
Keeper should have had the second and maybe the first, unlucky for the own goal but thats Darlo I guess.
Josh Gray had an absolute barnstorming game - Chesterfield simply werent in it - John Sheridan will have gone home tonight and stuck his lottery ticket on they were that lucky.
Ref had a good game as well, not the normal gash that we put with (except for the yellow cards that is)
Keeper should have had the second and maybe the first, unlucky for the own goal but thats Darlo I guess.
Josh Gray had an absolute barnstorming game - Chesterfield simply werent in it - John Sheridan will have gone home tonight and stuck his lottery ticket on they were that lucky.
Ref had a good game as well, not the normal gash that we put with (except for the yellow cards that is)
- BishopQuaker
- Posts: 4497
- Joined: Sat Jul 11, 2009 1:48 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: Useless Sacks of sh**e.
Regardless of whether I was there or not you've got to admit that being 2-0 up then losing 3-2 in 15 minutes on paper is pretty shite.ambiente wrote:Just got in and can't believe what I read here if you actually went to the game you would know what a tit you are with comments such as this.BishopQuaker wrote:3-2 from 2-0 up.
Well that confirms that we're utterly sh**e.
If we manage to get ove 1,500 fans for the next few home games I'll be astounded.
Should we somehow score after I post this I stand by what I've said.
Re: Useless Sacks of sh**e.
The result is shyte but we were not. You said we were, and as you are wrong you are still a titBishopQuaker wrote:Regardless of whether I was there or not you've got to admit that being 2-0 up then losing 3-2 in 15 minutes on paper is pretty sh**e.ambiente wrote:Just got in and can't believe what I read here if you actually went to the game you would know what a tit you are with comments such as this.BishopQuaker wrote:3-2 from 2-0 up.
Well that confirms that we're utterly sh**e.
If we manage to get ove 1,500 fans for the next few home games I'll be astounded.
Should we somehow score after I post this I stand by what I've said.
Re: Useless Sacks of sh**e.
Like I said one of those "you really needed to be there otherwise you'll never believe me" moments.BishopQuaker wrote:Regardless of whether I was there or not you've got to admit that being 2-0 up then losing 3-2 in 15 minutes on paper is pretty sh**e.ambiente wrote:Just got in and can't believe what I read here if you actually went to the game you would know what a tit you are with comments such as this.BishopQuaker wrote:3-2 from 2-0 up.
Well that confirms that we're utterly sh**e.
If we manage to get ove 1,500 fans for the next few home games I'll be astounded.
Should we somehow score after I post this I stand by what I've said.
You know me, I'll tell it as I see it and no way would I rose tint today, but we were really absolutely mugged. We were really really good, and the comeback was devastating.
But we WON'T run into a Chesterfield comeback every week, we just need to carry on as we were today.
My only complaint today was Diop's wastefulness otherwise Chesterfield would have been dead and buried and the comeback would never have happened. Diop himself doesn't actually look too bad a player but he is comedic in front of goal.
Re: Useless Sacks of sh**e.
That chance he had in the first half... I could have put that one in with me knob end
Re: Useless Sacks of sh**e.
Which chance? The one where Purcell put him through? Or the one where Gray ripped the rightback a new asrehole and put it on a plate for Diop, and it sort of bounced off him?
- BishopQuaker
- Posts: 4497
- Joined: Sat Jul 11, 2009 1:48 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: Useless Sacks of sh**e.
Oh calm down do ambiente
I went to Crewe and saw us got torn apart.
We were shite. Fact.
However, if that has changed I'm very happy that you got to see a decent Darlo performance - I'm happy if anyone managed to watch a decent Darlo performance!
But we still lost 3-2 which is not good.
I went to Crewe and saw us got torn apart.
We were shite. Fact.
However, if that has changed I'm very happy that you got to see a decent Darlo performance - I'm happy if anyone managed to watch a decent Darlo performance!
But we still lost 3-2 which is not good.
Re: Useless Sacks of sh**e.
for goodness sake lads ,for eighty mins we controlled the game they never looked like scoring. have a bit of compasion for the lads,steve staunton ruined the day with miss match subs why was alan white not brought on to stiffen the defence after their first goal. staunton has to learn fast. but i think we are now down ,i had hope untill today.
-
- Posts: 1216
- Joined: Sat Jul 11, 2009 8:41 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: Useless Sacks of sh**e.
I went to Crewe and I went today....for the first 80 mins,Chesterfield were as second best as we were against Crewe. We played very well today against a team that is on a good run of form.BishopQuaker wrote:Oh calm down do ambiente
I went to Crewe and saw us got torn apart.
We were sh**e. Fact.
However, if that has changed I'm very happy that you got to see a decent Darlo performance - I'm happy if anyone managed to watch a decent Darlo performance!
But we still lost 3-2 which is not good.
Re: Useless Sacks of sh**e.
Bishop Quaker what a prick
Re: Useless Sacks of sh**e.
You know that every post you have ever made has been an insult, like calling somebody (and me) a prick or a tit or a dick? Every single one of your 38 posts?
I find that admirable.
I find that admirable.
- BishopQuaker
- Posts: 4497
- Joined: Sat Jul 11, 2009 1:48 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: Useless Sacks of sh**e.
As someone I've never met, I think he's a bellend.Quakerz wrote:You know that every post you have ever made has been an insult, like calling somebody (and me) a prick or a tit or a dick? Every single one of your 38 posts?
I find that admirable.
Re: Useless Sacks of sh**e.
Over reaction on my part, sorry.BishopQuaker wrote:Oh calm down do ambiente
I went to Crewe and saw us got torn apart.
We were sh**e. Fact.
However, if that has changed I'm very happy that you got to see a decent Darlo performance - I'm happy if anyone managed to watch a decent Darlo performance!
But we still lost 3-2 which is not good.
Re: Useless Sacks of sh**e.
Quakerz wrote:This is one of those "you had to be there otherwise you won't believe me" moments but that was just a freakish comeback by Chesterfield and no way on Gods earth did we deserve to lose. We were well in command, looked a good team and really could have been more than 2 up, and thoroughly deserved it.fat tony wrote:I just cannot b@stard believe this.
We're completely shot, far too fragile. We're already down but I just hope this doesn't now trigger a load more of the hidings we were getting before christmas.
There are millions of positives from that performance once I get the defeat out of my system.
Fair enough that Q
Looking at it, if I thought we were actually in a relegation battle and had a chance of staying up then I'd still be fuming that we'd thrown the points away. But we're building for next season so the fact that we seem to have had a great 75 minutes today is probably the most important thing.
Re: Useless Sacks of sh**e.
We didn't throw the points away.
Chesterfield stole them. Sometimes that happens.
Chesterfield stole them. Sometimes that happens.
-
- Posts: 1777
- Joined: Sun Sep 06, 2009 8:56 am
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: Useless Sacks of sh**e.
The better team always wins.
Re: Useless Sacks of sh**e.
Incorrect.
See today.
See today.