Michael Smith

Arguments will be moved here. Obey the first and second rules.

Moderators: mikkyx, botrash, charlie, uncovered

Darlofan97
Posts: 4017
Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2010 1:44 pm
Team Supported: Darlington

Michael Smith

Post by Darlofan97 » Sat Jul 16, 2011 2:46 pm

Scored for Stoke U18's today in a 2-1 win over Tiverton.

Quakerz
Posts: 20959
Joined: Sat Jul 11, 2009 6:32 pm
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Michael Smith

Post by Quakerz » Sat Jul 16, 2011 2:56 pm

:D

Come on Smithy, show them what you can do!
Image

“Everybody knows where that club is going now, so I’m out of the way. They can carry on, it’s their club, they can keep it." - Raj Singh, 2017

User avatar
jjmick
Posts: 1572
Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2010 4:25 pm
Team Supported: Darlington
Location: Brompton-on-Swale

Re: Michael Smith

Post by jjmick » Sat Jul 16, 2011 2:58 pm

EXCELLENT! That means they will be impressed so we can send the fooker away :)

...even if it was only Tiverton (respectively)
Darlo till I die!!

User avatar
Spyman
Posts: 11555
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 10:04 pm
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Michael Smith

Post by Spyman » Sun Jul 17, 2011 6:48 pm

jjmick wrote:EXCELLENT! That means they will be impressed so we can send the fooker away :)

...even if it was only Tiverton (respectively)
Respectively?
:eh:
On Sunday April 29, 2012 at 10:25 pm, Darlo Cockney wrote:Sadly some people have nothing better to do that invent rumours.

We will be playing at the arena again next season - fact.

Quakerz - if you actually attended games and spoke to people you might actually find our facts, rather than spreading s*** on this board.

DC

comeondarlo
Posts: 2610
Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2009 7:54 am
Team Supported: Darlington
Location: A Swimming Pool (usually).

Re: Michael Smith

Post by comeondarlo » Sun Jul 17, 2011 6:51 pm

Spyman wrote:
jjmick wrote:EXCELLENT! That means they will be impressed so we can send the fooker away :)

...even if it was only Tiverton (respectively)
Respectively?
:eh:

Don't have a go at Mick, Q is bumming him!

Quakerz
Posts: 20959
Joined: Sat Jul 11, 2009 6:32 pm
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Michael Smith

Post by Quakerz » Sun Jul 17, 2011 6:52 pm

Haha, you're fucking well wobbled, out on your feet in fact.
Image

“Everybody knows where that club is going now, so I’m out of the way. They can carry on, it’s their club, they can keep it." - Raj Singh, 2017

User avatar
Darlo.For.Life
Posts: 1666
Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2010 12:57 pm
Team Supported: Darlington
Location: Newcastle

Re: Michael Smith

Post by Darlo.For.Life » Sun Jul 17, 2011 6:52 pm

Apparently Smith got Man of the Match.

User avatar
DarloOnTheUp
Posts: 6286
Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2009 12:35 am
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Michael Smith

Post by DarloOnTheUp » Sun Jul 17, 2011 6:53 pm

Spyman wrote:
jjmick wrote:EXCELLENT! That means they will be impressed so we can send the fooker away :)

...even if it was only Tiverton (respectively)
Respectively?
:eh:
My thoughts exactly.

Jazz Maverick
Posts: 4285
Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2009 8:36 am
Team Supported: Darlington
Location: London

Re: Michael Smith

Post by Jazz Maverick » Sun Jul 17, 2011 6:58 pm

DarloOnTheUp wrote:
Spyman wrote:
jjmick wrote:EXCELLENT! That means they will be impressed so we can send the fooker away :)

...even if it was only Tiverton (respectively)
Respectively?
:eh:
My thoughts exactly.
jjmick - clever as fuck :lol:

User avatar
jjmick
Posts: 1572
Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2010 4:25 pm
Team Supported: Darlington
Location: Brompton-on-Swale

Re: Michael Smith

Post by jjmick » Sun Jul 17, 2011 10:39 pm

Respectively can mean 'with respect to' as well as 'in the order stated'.
Darlo till I die!!

User avatar
DarloOnTheUp
Posts: 6286
Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2009 12:35 am
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Michael Smith

Post by DarloOnTheUp » Sun Jul 17, 2011 10:43 pm

jjmick wrote:Respectively can mean 'with respect to' as well as 'in the order stated'.
You're thinking of respectfully.

User avatar
BishopQuaker
Posts: 4497
Joined: Sat Jul 11, 2009 1:48 pm
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Michael Smith

Post by BishopQuaker » Sun Jul 17, 2011 10:46 pm

DarloOnTheUp wrote:
jjmick wrote:Respectively can mean 'with respect to' as well as 'in the order stated'.
You're thinking of respectfully.
Ooo Lexical BURN!

User avatar
jjmick
Posts: 1572
Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2010 4:25 pm
Team Supported: Darlington
Location: Brompton-on-Swale

Re: Michael Smith

Post by jjmick » Sun Jul 17, 2011 10:48 pm

Well whatever, that's what I meant. I don't give a fuck.

I'll probably get cyber-sieged or something now.
Darlo till I die!!

User avatar
DarloOnTheUp
Posts: 6286
Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2009 12:35 am
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Michael Smith

Post by DarloOnTheUp » Sun Jul 17, 2011 10:52 pm

jjmick wrote:Well whatever, that's what I meant. I don't give a fuck.

I'll probably get cyber-sieged or something now.
Coming from the self-confessed obsessive compulsive grammar/spelling monghead.

User avatar
BishopQuaker
Posts: 4497
Joined: Sat Jul 11, 2009 1:48 pm
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Michael Smith

Post by BishopQuaker » Sun Jul 17, 2011 10:58 pm

DarloOnTheUp wrote:
jjmick wrote:Well whatever, that's what I meant. I don't give a fuck.

I'll probably get cyber-sieged or something now.
Coming from the self-confessed obsessive compulsive grammar/spelling monghead.
Monghead?! :lol:

DOTU has brought forth a new insult.

User avatar
jjmick
Posts: 1572
Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2010 4:25 pm
Team Supported: Darlington
Location: Brompton-on-Swale

Re: Michael Smith

Post by jjmick » Sun Jul 17, 2011 10:59 pm

DarloOnTheUp wrote:
jjmick wrote:Well whatever, that's what I meant. I don't give a fuck.

I'll probably get cyber-sieged or something now.
Coming from the self-confessed obsessive compulsive grammar/spelling monghead.
I have never said I have OCD.

Your input is trivial.
Darlo till I die!!

User avatar
DarloOnTheUp
Posts: 6286
Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2009 12:35 am
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Michael Smith

Post by DarloOnTheUp » Sun Jul 17, 2011 11:06 pm

jjmick wrote:
wedgie wrote:we got out of gaol
Jail.
jjmick wrote:Look, it's just one of those things, I guess I have mild Obsessive Compulsive Disorder as I also have to have light switches that control the same light in the same position
You were saying?

User avatar
jjmick
Posts: 1572
Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2010 4:25 pm
Team Supported: Darlington
Location: Brompton-on-Swale

Re: Michael Smith

Post by jjmick » Sun Jul 17, 2011 11:17 pm

So you take more notice of what I say than I even do myself. You even went through threads to post quotes.
I guess I have more important things in my life to remember.

You boring wankwipe.
Darlo till I die!!

User avatar
DarloOnTheUp
Posts: 6286
Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2009 12:35 am
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Michael Smith

Post by DarloOnTheUp » Sun Jul 17, 2011 11:23 pm

jjmick wrote:So you take more notice of what I say than I even do myself. You even went through threads to post quotes.
I guess I have more important things in my life to remember.

You boring wankwipe.
I've just got a good memory, and all your posts can be found on your profile. It took me less than 5 minutes.

Oh, and I fucking hate bullshitters and complete and utter morons. You fall under both categories.

User avatar
jjmick
Posts: 1572
Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2010 4:25 pm
Team Supported: Darlington
Location: Brompton-on-Swale

Re: Michael Smith

Post by jjmick » Sun Jul 17, 2011 11:24 pm

DarloOnTheUp wrote:
jjmick wrote:So you take more notice of what I say than I even do myself. You even went through threads to post quotes.
I guess I have more important things in my life to remember.

You boring wankwipe.
I've just got a good memory, and all your posts can be found on your profile. It took me less than 5 minutes.

Oh, and I fucking hate bullshitters and complete and utter morons. You fall under both categories.
Yet you don't even know who I am.

How am I a bullshitter? Don't bring the OCD thing up again.
Darlo till I die!!

User avatar
DL5
Posts: 4621
Joined: Sat Jul 11, 2009 5:26 pm
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Michael Smith

Post by DL5 » Mon Jul 18, 2011 8:53 am

Getting back on topic, here's some Stoke fan's comments on Smith


"Comfortable 2-1! Will give more details tomorrow when I can confirm which players are which! Not very familiar with these guys I'm afraid! Can say for now that Capt. Lucas Dawson had a great game and scored a very good goal! The trialist from Darlington, if his name is Malcolm Smith and wore the number 9 shirt then he looked a real class act - took his goal with aplomb and was head and shoulders above most other players on show."



"Yeh, I can go with Michael Smith!! Tall rangy player - played basically up front as a lone striker but has a great 1st touch, holds ball up superbly and links well with oncoming players. Deceptively strong - held off 3 players - literally 4 feet from where me and me laddo were standing and slipped ball inside for midfield player. Class goal too - simply looked up and stroked ball into corner of net from just outside penalty box. He was the stand out player by far."
.

Quakerz
Posts: 20959
Joined: Sat Jul 11, 2009 6:32 pm
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Michael Smith

Post by Quakerz » Mon Jul 18, 2011 9:14 am

Go on son!

Having said that a 20 year old should stand out in an U-18 team.
Image

“Everybody knows where that club is going now, so I’m out of the way. They can carry on, it’s their club, they can keep it." - Raj Singh, 2017

User avatar
Hilly
Posts: 6251
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 9:07 pm
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Michael Smith

Post by Hilly » Mon Jul 18, 2011 9:21 am

Quakerz wrote:Having said that a 20 year old should stand out in an U-18 team.
Yeah...how does that work exactly?

number_one
Posts: 1777
Joined: Sun Sep 06, 2009 8:56 am
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Michael Smith

Post by number_one » Mon Jul 18, 2011 9:49 am

Work it out, tail.

User avatar
BishopQuaker
Posts: 4497
Joined: Sat Jul 11, 2009 1:48 pm
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Michael Smith

Post by BishopQuaker » Mon Jul 18, 2011 9:56 am

number_one wrote:Work it out, tail.
To be fair, that was a genuine question.

User avatar
Hilly
Posts: 6251
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 9:07 pm
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Michael Smith

Post by Hilly » Mon Jul 18, 2011 10:29 am

number_one wrote:Work it out, tail.
Tried working it out, but at 19 years and 9 months, I fail to see how he can play for Stoke U-18's.....tail.

User avatar
d5rlo
Posts: 94
Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 11:00 am
Team Supported: Darlington
Location: Darlington

Re: Michael Smith

Post by d5rlo » Mon Jul 18, 2011 10:36 am

You're allowed up to three 'over-age' players in an Academy league game, and probably even more in a friendly. Obviously you don't stick 28-year-olds in an under-18 game but it's common for 19 and occasionally 20-year-old players to play for the under-18s.

User avatar
Hilly
Posts: 6251
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 9:07 pm
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Michael Smith

Post by Hilly » Mon Jul 18, 2011 10:40 am

d5rlo wrote:You're allowed up to three 'over-age' players in an Academy league game, and probably even more in a friendly. Obviously you don't stick 28-year-olds in an under-18 game but it's common for 19 and occasionally 20-year-old players to play for the under-18s.
Cheers mate. See Numero Uno - was that hard?

shawry
Posts: 2558
Joined: Sat Jul 11, 2009 4:55 pm
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Michael Smith

Post by shawry » Mon Jul 18, 2011 10:57 am

Hilly wrote:
d5rlo wrote:You're allowed up to three 'over-age' players in an Academy league game, and probably even more in a friendly. Obviously you don't stick 28-year-olds in an under-18 game but it's common for 19 and occasionally 20-year-old players to play for the under-18s.
Cheers mate. See Numero Uno - was that hard?
Hilly, I actually thought your first post was querying how, or why, a 20 year old would shine in an under 18 game :)

User avatar
BishopQuaker
Posts: 4497
Joined: Sat Jul 11, 2009 1:48 pm
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Michael Smith

Post by BishopQuaker » Mon Jul 18, 2011 11:38 am

shawry_99 wrote:
Hilly wrote:
d5rlo wrote:You're allowed up to three 'over-age' players in an Academy league game, and probably even more in a friendly. Obviously you don't stick 28-year-olds in an under-18 game but it's common for 19 and occasionally 20-year-old players to play for the under-18s.
Cheers mate. See Numero Uno - was that hard?
Hilly, I actually thought your first post was querying how, or why, a 20 year old would shine in an under 18 game :)
I think it's more a case of you read what he typed but you knew what he meant.

But round these parts it's any excuse to stick the knife in.

Post Reply