Are you claiming that we owe you rent?kingswaykid wrote:Fuckoff you knob. Get the rent paid.AndyPark wrote:Oh shut up you whinging T***
I hope you can back that up with some sort of evidence?
Are you claiming that we owe you rent?kingswaykid wrote:Fuckoff you knob. Get the rent paid.AndyPark wrote:Oh shut up you whinging T***
Ask the powers that be at your club! Not just a small amount from what I've heard either. You wonder why people get pissed off!! Not sure but think you still owe money from the stand behind the goal too. Then you are improving the squad at a cost and planning on weekly marquees!Quakerz wrote:Are you claiming that we owe you rent?kingswaykid wrote:Fuckoff you knob. Get the rent paid.AndyPark wrote:Oh shut up you whinging T***
I hope you can back that up with some sort of evidence?
Too long!! End of this season it runs to I think.the striped tiger wrote:Has anyone ever wondered what will happen when your agreement to groundshare with Bishop is up? They could pretty much increase the sub rent to whatever they like... Good idea to keep them sweet I reckon..how long is there left on ur groundsharing agreement?
Yes they could do that, but there is no way we should be emotionally blackmailed into keeping any landlord "sweet"the striped tiger wrote:Has anyone ever wondered what will happen when your agreement to groundshare with Bishop is up? They could pretty much increase the sub rent to whatever they like... Good idea to keep them sweet I reckon..how long is there left on ur groundsharing agreement?
We all know there's only one possible solution to that in the short term, like it or notQuakerz wrote:Yes they could do that, but there is no way we should be emotionally blackmailed into keeping any landlord "sweet"the striped tiger wrote:Has anyone ever wondered what will happen when your agreement to groundshare with Bishop is up? They could pretty much increase the sub rent to whatever they like... Good idea to keep them sweet I reckon..how long is there left on ur groundsharing agreement?
Fact is whether Bishop want us to stay for years or want us out on 1 season or 2...we're soon going to need a better graded ground than Bishop anyway. That makes it almost irrelevant if they turf us out or not.
We need to somehow magic a BSN+ graded ground out of thin air in 2 years. This means we've got a problem.
Wondered how long it would take you to jump in on this Stripey? Crawl back in your hole, you need to spend some time working out who the next club is who need their identity stealing for when Brad gets bored and walks awaythe striped tiger wrote:Has anyone ever wondered what will happen when your agreement to groundshare with Bishop is up? They could pretty much increase the sub rent to whatever they like... Good idea to keep them sweet I reckon..how long is there left on ur groundsharing agreement?
No.kingswaykid wrote:Ask the powers that be at your club!
What you have "heard" is not evidence. It could be fabricated, exaggerated, could even be true...but you just can't go around making such claims without evidence.Not just a small amount from what I've heard either.
I do actually, yes. You appear to be telling me that people get "issed off", because they don't like what they "heard", and because they don't like hearing facts.You wonder why people get issed off!!
Not sure but thought you'd post anyway? Even if we do owe money on that stand, it's not money owed to you - not your worry is it?Not sure but think you still owe money from the stand behind the goal too.
Everybody is improving (or trying to) their squads at "a cost". Everything has "a cost". Don't see your point there.Then you are improving the squad at a cost and planning on weekly marquees!
I hear they do great dummies at Pound LandFuckoff you knob. Get the rent paid.
Darlo Till I Die wrote:I hear they do great dummies at Pound LandFuckoff you knob. Get the rent paid.
They also have a vested interest in keeping us sweet, they make a lot of money from us leasing the ground for our home games. If they start taking the Michael then we'll just up sticks and move elsewhere and Bishop's will be left with a hole in the finances.the striped tiger wrote:Has anyone ever wondered what will happen when your agreement to groundshare with Bishop is up? They could pretty much increase the sub rent to whatever they like... Good idea to keep them sweet I reckon..how long is there left on ur groundsharing agreement?
If Bishop wanted to do this they would be stupid. 25k is better than nothing!the striped tiger wrote:Has anyone ever wondered what will happen when your agreement to groundshare with Bishop is up? They could pretty much increase the sub rent to whatever they like... Good idea to keep them sweet I reckon..how long is there left on ur groundsharing agreement?
This isn't arrogance, but why should we have to keep Bishop sweet? At the end of the day, we pay them good money in rent and they receive 50% of the bar takings IIRC. We also erected a temporary stand which Bishop fans can use on match-days.the striped tiger wrote:Has anyone ever wondered what will happen when your agreement to groundshare with Bishop is up? They could pretty much increase the sub rent to whatever they like... Good idea to keep them sweet I reckon..how long is there left on ur groundsharing agreement?
kingswaykid wrote:wouldn't be at all surprised if you still owe us a wedge of that from last year.
kingswaykid wrote:Not just a small amount from what I've heard either. You wonder why people get pissed off!!
First you say you "wouldn't be surprised" if we owe money, then you say you've "heard" that we definitely do, then you're "not sure but think" we owe money for the stand. LOL!kingswaykid wrote:Not sure but think you still owe money from the stand behind the goal too. Then you are improving the squad at a cost and planning on weekly marquees!
To be honest, I'm pissing myself at the thought of the Northern League having to rearrange a load of their fixtures because of us.lo36789 wrote:This feels a little in bad taste especially when we have already picked out that a rejig of ours would be pretty simple really.SeadogUpdate wrote:In ground shares the club playing at the higher level get priority. FA rules. Matters not who is the landlord and who is the tenant.
On Sunday April 29, 2012 at 10:25 pm, Darlo Cockney wrote:Sadly some people have nothing better to do that invent rumours.
We will be playing at the arena again next season - fact.
Quakerz - if you actually attended games and spoke to people you might actually find our facts, rather than spreading s*** on this board.
DC
Spyman wrote:To be honest, I'm pissing myself at the thought of the Northern League having to rearrange a load of their fixtures because of us.lo36789 wrote:This feels a little in bad taste especially when we have already picked out that a rejig of ours would be pretty simple really.SeadogUpdate wrote:In ground shares the club playing at the higher level get priority. FA rules. Matters not who is the landlord and who is the tenant.
Mike Amos will be spitting feathers and making all sorts of digs in his blog.
Well that cheered me up tosser.kingswaykid wrote:Quakerz you've proved beyond doubt your an A grade prick with your posts on here and as PKD on NLZ. Who gives a flying fuck if you've got places to go (or think or hope you have), your 1 league above us at present and really don't think we should be rearranging our fixtures at all, basically because it's our ground. Another fucked up rule made by the FA. Quakerz your Darlo not fucking Man Utd, no divine right to have rule of the roost. Hope you hurry up and get a ground sorted somewhere because I've had enough of this ground share now and BENDING OVER BACKWARDS FOR YOU! Stick the 20k up your arse as far as I'm concerned, wouldn't be at all surprised if you still owe us a wedge of that from last year.
On Sunday April 29, 2012 at 10:25 pm, Darlo Cockney wrote:Sadly some people have nothing better to do that invent rumours.
We will be playing at the arena again next season - fact.
Quakerz - if you actually attended games and spoke to people you might actually find our facts, rather than spreading s*** on this board.
DC
All the NL seem to think Bishop's are doing us a massive favour by letting us use their ground, I'm sure Bishop's are more than happy with the rent they're receiving.Spyman wrote:Anyway, why are we talking about this in the context of keeping Bishop Auckland sweet?
We didn't make up the rules about whose fixtures take precedence - we're just doing as the authorities say. Perhaps it was a bit short sighted of Bishop and the Northern League to not anticipate this happening a year ago.
But then again, all the daft NL fuckers thought WE were the ones in for a shock, didn't they?.