Curzon Ashton incident

Open now for discussion of all things Darlo!

Moderators: mikkyx, uncovered

Post Reply
eddie-rowles
Posts: 310
Joined: Fri Jan 24, 2014 7:51 am
Team Supported: Darlington

Curzon Ashton incident

Post by eddie-rowles » Thu Sep 09, 2021 11:22 am

https://darlingtonfc.co.uk/news/curzon- ... b-decision

Well done to the individual apologised and admitted he made a mistake and took his punishment, I was at the game but followed the ball and did not observe what happened.
For those many easily identified individuals who ran on the pitch at Walsall in FA Cup in front of BBC guess you were lucky.

bga
Posts: 1798
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2011 7:18 pm
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Curzon Ashton incident

Post by bga » Thu Sep 09, 2021 11:40 am

Swift and appropriate action by the club. Wonder how many Premiership/Football League Clubs would be able to demonstrate the same for a similar incident? Though I think as has been reported on here previously in those circumstances you would be breaking the law so a different procedure to be followed I guess.

bga
Posts: 1798
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2011 7:18 pm
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Curzon Ashton incident

Post by bga » Thu Sep 09, 2021 11:47 am

I meant to add I wonder if Cutzon have accepted the outcome given it happened at their place?

spen666
Posts: 2057
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 9:12 pm
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Curzon Ashton incident

Post by spen666 » Thu Sep 09, 2021 12:34 pm

bga wrote:
Thu Sep 09, 2021 11:40 am
Swift and appropriate action by the club. Wonder how many Premiership/Football League Clubs would be able to demonstrate the same for a similar incident? Though I think as has been reported on here previously in those circumstances you would be breaking the law so a different procedure to be followed I guess.

For Premiership / Football League clubs, the police would probably take action and apply for a banning order under Football Spectators Act - minimum 3 year ban from all games at National League or above, and internationals, friendlies etc and FA cup from 4th QR.

darlo2001uk
Posts: 1362
Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2009 4:10 pm
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Curzon Ashton incident

Post by darlo2001uk » Thu Sep 09, 2021 1:06 pm

Why has he not been identified?

lo36789
Posts: 9515
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2011 10:58 pm
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Curzon Ashton incident

Post by lo36789 » Thu Sep 09, 2021 2:50 pm

darlo2001uk wrote:
Thu Sep 09, 2021 1:06 pm
Why has he not been identified?
I suspect he has given he admitted to it.

spen666
Posts: 2057
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 9:12 pm
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Curzon Ashton incident

Post by spen666 » Thu Sep 09, 2021 4:09 pm

darlo2001uk wrote:
Thu Sep 09, 2021 1:06 pm
Why has he not been identified?
Data Protection I guess.

darlo2001uk
Posts: 1362
Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2009 4:10 pm
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Curzon Ashton incident

Post by darlo2001uk » Thu Sep 09, 2021 8:03 pm

lo36789 wrote:
Thu Sep 09, 2021 2:50 pm
darlo2001uk wrote:
Thu Sep 09, 2021 1:06 pm
Why has he not been identified?
I suspect he has given he admitted to it.
You know what I mean. Why has he not been named?

lo36789
Posts: 9515
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2011 10:58 pm
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Curzon Ashton incident

Post by lo36789 » Thu Sep 09, 2021 9:26 pm

darlo2001uk wrote:
Thu Sep 09, 2021 8:03 pm
lo36789 wrote:
Thu Sep 09, 2021 2:50 pm
darlo2001uk wrote:
Thu Sep 09, 2021 1:06 pm
Why has he not been identified?
I suspect he has given he admitted to it.
You know what I mean. Why has he not been named?
Is it even data protection?

What purpose / who does naming publicly serve?

wizardofos
Posts: 181
Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2009 9:14 am
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Curzon Ashton incident

Post by wizardofos » Fri Sep 10, 2021 4:58 am

lo36789 wrote:
Thu Sep 09, 2021 9:26 pm
darlo2001uk wrote:
Thu Sep 09, 2021 8:03 pm
lo36789 wrote:
Thu Sep 09, 2021 2:50 pm
darlo2001uk wrote:
Thu Sep 09, 2021 1:06 pm
Why has he not been identified?
I suspect he has given he admitted to it.
You know what I mean. Why has he not been named?
Is it even data protection?

What purpose / who does naming publicly serve?
It acts as a further deterrent.

lo36789
Posts: 9515
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2011 10:58 pm
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Curzon Ashton incident

Post by lo36789 » Fri Sep 10, 2021 8:35 am

wizardofos wrote:
Fri Sep 10, 2021 4:58 am
It acts as a further deterrent.
I don't agree. I also really don't agree with name to shame culture.

If a critical deterrent to a person taking an action they shouldn't is avoidance of being shamed on the internet society is fundamentally broken.

Foolish action, admitted fault, ban applied, we move on.

Post Reply