Re: Kettering v Darlo
Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2021 9:21 pm
The Kettering Town account that is.
The number one Darlington FC fan's website
https://www.darlofc.co.uk:443/forum/
https://www.darlofc.co.uk:443/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=39723
Another example of how lucky we are to have the media team we have.
Spot on. The highlights were so disjointed I thought my internet was playing up. Great goal from Lambert & generally a well- disciplined team performance despite provocation from KTFC (or should that be KFC, the obvious sponsor of Perry)?feethamslad wrote: ↑Mon Nov 08, 2021 10:15 pmWe sure are lucky to have Kev and the team that do our media! What poor editing. Note how they edited out the appalling tackle on Lambert just before the penalty.
Was it a particular highlight of the match - a foul? There was no caution for a tackle on Lambert before the penalty so assume it wasn't that stand out? Or are you perhaps showing a little bit of bias there in a perspective?feethamslad wrote: ↑Mon Nov 08, 2021 10:15 pmNote how they edited out the appalling tackle on Lambert just before the penalty.
Perhaps the full commentary stream was worse but I heard that it was a deserved goal when we took the lead, that Kettering were poor, that Kettering needed to stop committing fouls in promising areas as it put them under pressure and they called the penalty before it was even blown, the only derogatory thing said about us was that our opener was our first shot on goal - this is consistent with what people said on here - our own fans said we weren't great in the first half.Yarblockos wrote: ↑Mon Nov 08, 2021 9:59 pmIndeed. And I take back everything I said about Quaker TV being biased.
I think he means the tackle on Rivers - which was the most blatant red card you could ever see.lo36789 wrote: ↑Tue Nov 09, 2021 8:55 amWas it a particular highlight of the match - a foul? There was no caution for a tackle on Lambert before the penalty so assume it wasn't that stand out? Or are you perhaps showing a little bit of bias there in a perspective?feethamslad wrote: ↑Mon Nov 08, 2021 10:15 pmNote how they edited out the appalling tackle on Lambert just before the penalty.
Can see a justification on the pace and distance side of it, but the reality point of contact is below the ball of the ankle, he is sliding not off the floor and the contact is glancing rather than full contact.darlo2001uk wrote: ↑Tue Nov 09, 2021 11:06 amI think he means the tackle on Rivers - which was the most blatant red card you could ever see.
Were you actually there?
Yes my mistake - should have said Rivers (have now amended my original post). We were sat in the stand quite close to the incident and thought it should have been a straight red card.darlo2001uk wrote: ↑Tue Nov 09, 2021 11:06 amI think he means the tackle on Rivers - which was the most blatant red card you could ever see.lo36789 wrote: ↑Tue Nov 09, 2021 8:55 amWas it a particular highlight of the match - a foul? There was no caution for a tackle on Lambert before the penalty so assume it wasn't that stand out? Or are you perhaps showing a little bit of bias there in a perspective?feethamslad wrote: ↑Mon Nov 08, 2021 10:15 pmNote how they edited out the appalling tackle on Lambert just before the penalty.
lo36789 wrote: ↑Tue Nov 09, 2021 8:55 amWas it a particular highlight of the match - a foul? There was no caution for a tackle on Lambert before the penalty so assume it wasn't that stand out? Or are you perhaps showing a little bit of bias there in a perspective?feethamslad wrote: ↑Mon Nov 08, 2021 10:15 pmNote how they edited out the appalling tackle on Lambert just before the penalty.
My mistake - should have said Rivers not Lambert - have now edited my original post. We thought that this should have been a straight red card. Horrendous tackle.Yarblockos wrote: ↑Mon Nov 08, 2021 9:59 pmIndeed. And I take back everything I said about Quaker TV being biased.
Totally agree.feethamslad wrote: ↑Tue Nov 09, 2021 1:50 pmYes my mistake - should have said Rivers (have now amended my original post). We were sat in the stand quite close to the incident and thought it should have been a straight red card.darlo2001uk wrote: ↑Tue Nov 09, 2021 11:06 amI think he means the tackle on Rivers - which was the most blatant red card you could ever see.lo36789 wrote: ↑Tue Nov 09, 2021 8:55 amWas it a particular highlight of the match - a foul? There was no caution for a tackle on Lambert before the penalty so assume it wasn't that stand out? Or are you perhaps showing a little bit of bias there in a perspective?feethamslad wrote: ↑Mon Nov 08, 2021 10:15 pmNote how they edited out the appalling tackle on Lambert just before the penalty.
I was there also, and totally agree with all of thisdarlo2001uk wrote: ↑Tue Nov 09, 2021 3:24 pmTotally agree.feethamslad wrote: ↑Tue Nov 09, 2021 1:50 pmYes my mistake - should have said Rivers (have now amended my original post). We were sat in the stand quite close to the incident and thought it should have been a straight red card.darlo2001uk wrote: ↑Tue Nov 09, 2021 11:06 amI think he means the tackle on Rivers - which was the most blatant red card you could ever see.lo36789 wrote: ↑Tue Nov 09, 2021 8:55 amWas it a particular highlight of the match - a foul? There was no caution for a tackle on Lambert before the penalty so assume it wasn't that stand out? Or are you perhaps showing a little bit of bias there in a perspective?feethamslad wrote: ↑Mon Nov 08, 2021 10:15 pmNote how they edited out the appalling tackle on Lambert just before the penalty.
No, it is on the Kettering footage?loan_star wrote: ↑Tue Nov 09, 2021 12:40 pmWere you actually there?
Cassidy did not elbow Perry. Perry actually shoved Cassidy who then shoved him back shoulder to shoulder, Perry going down like a big fucking pansy.
And as for the offside, if you aren't level with the linesman then how can you say it was incorrect? Was he flagging against Perry or someone else?
But you are making a presumption based on what footage you can see as well as taking the commentators word that there was an elbow.lo36789 wrote: ↑Wed Nov 10, 2021 12:33 am
No, it is on the Kettering footage?
The commentator says elbow. As I said it isn't visible on the footage but my assumption, because it happens 99% of the time is there are raised arms and Perry attempts to make something of nothing - which sounds like I was bang on. There is a coming together and people see arms and then fill in the blanks themselves.
Based on the above it happened with the "red card" because I've seen the footage of that tackle and it just simply isn't.
The offside. It clearly shows the ball go out left and not a single Kettering player other than Perry make any movement towards it. You can see that Perry is in an offside position when the ball is played and is fouled. As the ball is not in playing distance of them at the time there is no offside offence committed but there is a foul - so the offside is incorrect.
No I didn't I said there was a suggestion of an elbow (on the commentary) but that the reality was most likely different.loan_star wrote: ↑Wed Nov 10, 2021 12:41 pmBut you are making a presumption based on what footage you can see as well as taking the commentators word that there was an elbow.lo36789 wrote: ↑Wed Nov 10, 2021 12:33 am
No, it is on the Kettering footage?
The commentator says elbow. As I said it isn't visible on the footage but my assumption, because it happens 99% of the time is there are raised arms and Perry attempts to make something of nothing - which sounds like I was bang on. There is a coming together and people see arms and then fill in the blanks themselves.
Based on the above it happened with the "red card" because I've seen the footage of that tackle and it just simply isn't.
The offside. It clearly shows the ball go out left and not a single Kettering player other than Perry make any movement towards it. You can see that Perry is in an offside position when the ball is played and is fouled. As the ball is not in playing distance of them at the time there is no offside offence committed but there is a foul - so the offside is incorrect.
I was there and Cassidy did not use his elbow. I know I am biased but Perry made a big thing out of nothing.
As it happens I thought Purver was lucky to stay on in another incident where he had a foot raised and fouled an opponent after already being booked, it was an offence that quite often ends up with a caution.
Is there a rule about having to be within playing distance of the ball to be offside? If you are offside and chasing after a through ball, or offside when a ball is crossed, you are offside. You don't have to be within playing distance of the ball, you just need to be making a movement towards the ball.lo36789 wrote: ↑Wed Nov 10, 2021 12:33 amThe offside. It clearly shows the ball go out left and not a single Kettering player other than Perry make any movement towards it. You can see that Perry is in an offside position when the ball is played and is fouled. As the ball is not in playing distance of them at the time there is no offside offence committed but there is a foul - so the offside is incorrect.
Yes, law 11Yarblockos wrote: ↑Wed Nov 10, 2021 2:01 pmIs there a rule about having to be within playing distance of the ball to be offside? If you are offside and chasing after a through ball, or offside when a ball is crossed, you are offside. You don't have to be within playing distance of the ball, you just need to be making a movement towards the ball.lo36789 wrote: ↑Wed Nov 10, 2021 12:33 amThe offside. It clearly shows the ball go out left and not a single Kettering player other than Perry make any movement towards it. You can see that Perry is in an offside position when the ball is played and is fouled. As the ball is not in playing distance of them at the time there is no offside offence committed but there is a foul - so the offside is incorrect.
Perry is that fat hes offside as soon as he comes on the pitch.lo36789 wrote: ↑Wed Nov 10, 2021 3:19 pm
Remember the European final thing between France and Spain. Mbappe was running onto a through ball - he was in an offside position when it was played but he was 4 or 5 yards away from the Spanish defender. Spanish defender slid to play the ball intentionally, Mbappe had no impact on this defenders ability to play the ball he play it unimpeded. He didn't make a great contact on the ball and played the ball into Mbappe's path who scored. As confirmed by FIFA and UEFA this was not offside as play reset the moment the Spanish defender intentionally played the ball, and prior to doing that he was not impeded in doing so by the attacker.
Perry did none of these things, he was pulled to the ground before he had a chance to do anything.