Morals, discrimination, taking the piss about a helpless condition. Hardly fuck all.comeondarlo wrote:It's an arguement about fuck all
Disgusted
- jjmick
- Posts: 1572
- Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2010 4:25 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
- Location: Brompton-on-Swale
Re: Disgusted
Darlo till I die!!
Re: Disgusted
Nobody from the PC crowd has turned up. Darlo Rob is simply trying to further his agenda and get me struck off - faking PC outrage is his weapon of choice. Good for him I say.comeondarlo wrote:It's an arguement about fuck all, now the PC crowd have turned up; it's doing my head in!
-
- Posts: 1209
- Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2009 7:31 am
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: Disgusted
Paul - You were wrong to have a go at him - fact - hindsight is wonderful.Quakerz wrote:I've tried to be honest and it took me until the second half to click on that he had a speech problem, even when I said "his stammering is grating on me" I still didn't think "oh hang on, he actually has a stammer" to myself. I just presumed that he was being crap today. I presumed that because he talked so much that he just kept on fucking up.Darlo Cockney wrote:Paul
I know that you did not realise that the guy had a speech impediment, but now that you do, you should undoubtedly apologise.
If you had a special needs kid and someone took the piss out of them, then I know that you would justifiably be angry.
Everyone makes mistakes............ you will get a hell of a lot more respect if you do the right thing.
DC
I'm not going to say this anymore, I was criticising his commentary
Apologise and move on mate.
DC
Started out with nothin' and I still got most of it left.
Re: Disgusted
u dont have to read it to be faircomeondarlo wrote:It's an arguement about fuck all, now the PC crowd have turned up; it's doing my head in!
-
- Posts: 2803
- Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2009 7:54 am
- Team Supported: Darlington
- Location: A Swimming Pool (usually).
Re: Disgusted
You're right, goodnight
- DarloOnTheUp
- Posts: 6346
- Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2009 12:35 am
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: Disgusted
Yes, but nobody would actually hire him.hodgie1 wrote:well, actually yes, as in theory he could sign then a speaking person could relay what the mute was saying, if a mute applied to commentate on footie, and proved that with the aid of a speaking person he could do the job, then the radio station couldnt not give him the job because hes a mute, its called 'reasonable adjustment' in law
How about THIS then? A no-armed mechanic? You've already taken this thread into ridiculous levels of silliness, so why not take it further?
Re: Disgusted
Nobody discriminated against anybody, nobody willingly took the piss about a helpless condition.jjmick wrote:Morals, discrimination, taking the piss about a helpless condition. Hardly fuck all.comeondarlo wrote:It's an arguement about fuck all
Fuck me if the commentator reads this he'll be more annoyed at the people trying to paint him as a helpless almost fucking disabled helpless victim, than he will be at what I said!
Clearly Darlo Rob has scored points with you.
Re: Disgusted
I wasn't wrong to have a go at him because he wasn't good enough. I'm not interested in discussing it with you any further.Darlo Cockney wrote:
Paul - You were wrong to have a go at him - fact - hindsight is wonderful.
Apologise and move on mate.
DC
Re: Disgusted
Maybe a blind bus driver could have a co pilot to tell him when to turn the corner, that would work, right?DarloOnTheUp wrote:Yes, but nobody would actually hire him.hodgie1 wrote:well, actually yes, as in theory he could sign then a speaking person could relay what the mute was saying, if a mute applied to commentate on footie, and proved that with the aid of a speaking person he could do the job, then the radio station couldnt not give him the job because hes a mute, its called 'reasonable adjustment' in law
How about THIS then? A no-armed mechanic? You've already taken this thread into ridiculous levels of silliness, so why not take it further?
.
- DarloOnTheUp
- Posts: 6346
- Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2009 12:35 am
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: Disgusted
How about a deaf call-person? They could have a helper to tell them what the person on the phone is saying, unless of course the deaf person's helper had no arms, in which case he would need a helper to tell the deaf person what his helper was saying.DL5 wrote:Maybe a blind bus driver could have a co pilot to tell him when to turn the corner, that would work, right?DarloOnTheUp wrote:Yes, but nobody would actually hire him.hodgie1 wrote:well, actually yes, as in theory he could sign then a speaking person could relay what the mute was saying, if a mute applied to commentate on footie, and proved that with the aid of a speaking person he could do the job, then the radio station couldnt not give him the job because hes a mute, its called 'reasonable adjustment' in law
How about THIS then? A no-armed mechanic? You've already taken this thread into ridiculous levels of silliness, so why not take it further?
Re: Disgusted
Eh? Further my agenda, what agenda? I'm highlighting what some posters typed in the match thread and I asked for an apology in the first post of this thread. If that wasn't forthcoming then I suggested a ban.
You trying to justify your actions is spineless.
You trying to justify your actions is spineless.
Re: Disgusted
again, yes, in theory, he could know everything about mechanics there is to know, then he could pass on his knowledge - or he could get prosthetic arms fitted and probably do the job himselfDarloOnTheUp wrote:Yes, but nobody would actually hire him.hodgie1 wrote:well, actually yes, as in theory he could sign then a speaking person could relay what the mute was saying, if a mute applied to commentate on footie, and proved that with the aid of a speaking person he could do the job, then the radio station couldnt not give him the job because hes a mute, its called 'reasonable adjustment' in law
How about THIS then? A no-armed mechanic? You've already taken this thread into ridiculous levels of silliness, so why not take it further?
how do u know that no-one would hire either of them, either the mechanic/mute radio person if they can do the job as good anyone else then its illegal to not give them the job because of their disability, its not silliness - its fact
- DarloOnTheUp
- Posts: 6346
- Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2009 12:35 am
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: Disgusted
hodgie1 wrote:again, yes, in theory, he could know everything about mechanics there is to know, then he could pass on his knowledge - or he could get prosthetic arms fitted and probably do the job himselfDarloOnTheUp wrote:Yes, but nobody would actually hire him.hodgie1 wrote:well, actually yes, as in theory he could sign then a speaking person could relay what the mute was saying, if a mute applied to commentate on footie, and proved that with the aid of a speaking person he could do the job, then the radio station couldnt not give him the job because hes a mute, its called 'reasonable adjustment' in law
How about THIS then? A no-armed mechanic? You've already taken this thread into ridiculous levels of silliness, so why not take it further?
how do u know that no-one would hire either of them, either the mechanic/mute radio person if they can do the job as good anyone else then its illegal to not give them the job because of their disability, its not silliness - its fact
You're really not getting the point of these hypothetical questions, are you?
- jjmick
- Posts: 1572
- Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2010 4:25 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
- Location: Brompton-on-Swale
Re: Disgusted
I said the condition was helpless i.e. it's not his fault he does it. It's just plain cuntish to quote what he said in a mocking way.Quakerz wrote:Nobody discriminated against anybody, nobody willingly took the piss about a helpless condition.jjmick wrote:Morals, discrimination, taking the piss about a helpless condition. Hardly fuck all.comeondarlo wrote:It's an arguement about fuck all
Fuck me if the commentator reads this he'll be more annoyed at the people trying to paint him as a helpless almost fucking disabled helpless victim, than he will be at what I said!
Clearly Darlo Rob has scored points with you.
Darlo till I die!!
Re: Disgusted
no, because thats not a reasonable adjustment, it would effect health and safety hence the wod 'reasonable'DL5 wrote:Maybe a blind bus driver could have a co pilot to tell him when to turn the corner, that would work, right?DarloOnTheUp wrote:Yes, but nobody would actually hire him.hodgie1 wrote:well, actually yes, as in theory he could sign then a speaking person could relay what the mute was saying, if a mute applied to commentate on footie, and proved that with the aid of a speaking person he could do the job, then the radio station couldnt not give him the job because hes a mute, its called 'reasonable adjustment' in law
How about THIS then? A no-armed mechanic? You've already taken this thread into ridiculous levels of silliness, so why not take it further?
Re: Disgusted
Its one of the reasons I wouldnt want to co-commentate, other than the fact that I swear too much and people cant understand a word I say, when people who have some journalistic training cant even survive without being abused for whatever reason then whoever does it is on a hiding to nothing.
Personally I thought that despite a couple of misused words Garry did a good job today to keep the listener informed about what was going on. I cant comment on Nicks commentary at Tamworth but to be fair, having been at that game, I dont think anyone could have found any positives to come out with. If the game is shite and theres naff all happening then what the fuck is he meant to say?
Fucks sake, even Kevan Smith and Martin Gray, who can provide professional insight into a game, get slated too.
Personally I thought that despite a couple of misused words Garry did a good job today to keep the listener informed about what was going on. I cant comment on Nicks commentary at Tamworth but to be fair, having been at that game, I dont think anyone could have found any positives to come out with. If the game is shite and theres naff all happening then what the fuck is he meant to say?
Fucks sake, even Kevan Smith and Martin Gray, who can provide professional insight into a game, get slated too.
- DarloOnTheUp
- Posts: 6346
- Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2009 12:35 am
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: Disgusted
AHA, so you think having a helper for a mute person on the radio is reasonable? I fucking don't.hodgie1 wrote:no, because thats not a reasonable adjustment, it would effect health and safety hence the wod 'reasonable'DL5 wrote:Maybe a blind bus driver could have a co pilot to tell him when to turn the corner, that would work, right?DarloOnTheUp wrote:Yes, but nobody would actually hire him.hodgie1 wrote:well, actually yes, as in theory he could sign then a speaking person could relay what the mute was saying, if a mute applied to commentate on footie, and proved that with the aid of a speaking person he could do the job, then the radio station couldnt not give him the job because hes a mute, its called 'reasonable adjustment' in law
How about THIS then? A no-armed mechanic? You've already taken this thread into ridiculous levels of silliness, so why not take it further?
Re: Disgusted
yep, i believe i amDarloOnTheUp wrote:hodgie1 wrote:again, yes, in theory, he could know everything about mechanics there is to know, then he could pass on his knowledge - or he could get prosthetic arms fitted and probably do the job himselfDarloOnTheUp wrote:Yes, but nobody would actually hire him.hodgie1 wrote:well, actually yes, as in theory he could sign then a speaking person could relay what the mute was saying, if a mute applied to commentate on footie, and proved that with the aid of a speaking person he could do the job, then the radio station couldnt not give him the job because hes a mute, its called 'reasonable adjustment' in law
How about THIS then? A no-armed mechanic? You've already taken this thread into ridiculous levels of silliness, so why not take it further?
how do u know that no-one would hire either of them, either the mechanic/mute radio person if they can do the job as good anyone else then its illegal to not give them the job because of their disability, its not silliness - its fact
You're really not getting the point of these hypothetical questions, are you?
Re: Disgusted
Spineless?Darlo_Rob wrote:Eh? Further my agenda, what agenda? I'm highlighting what some posters typed in the match thread and I asked for an apology in the first post of this thread. If that wasn't forthcoming then I suggested a ban.
You trying to justify your actions is spineless.
Take a step away from the constant "he must be banned", "he's a bully/outrage/scumbag" rhetoric first of all because you are doing exactly what you are accusing me of...
Then, once you do that, explain to me how sticking to my guns and refusing to cave in to you is "spineless"?
Thanks.
- DarloOnTheUp
- Posts: 6346
- Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2009 12:35 am
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: Disgusted
Trust me, you're not. You're editing the conditions as you know I'm right and can't force yourself to say "no, I wouldn't hire a no-armed mechanic". Hypothetical questions can't be fucking edited by a third-party. You need to answer them as they are as they aren't real situations.hodgie1 wrote:yep, i believe i amDarloOnTheUp wrote:hodgie1 wrote:again, yes, in theory, he could know everything about mechanics there is to know, then he could pass on his knowledge - or he could get prosthetic arms fitted and probably do the job himselfDarloOnTheUp wrote:Yes, but nobody would actually hire him.hodgie1 wrote:well, actually yes, as in theory he could sign then a speaking person could relay what the mute was saying, if a mute applied to commentate on footie, and proved that with the aid of a speaking person he could do the job, then the radio station couldnt not give him the job because hes a mute, its called 'reasonable adjustment' in law
How about THIS then? A no-armed mechanic? You've already taken this thread into ridiculous levels of silliness, so why not take it further?
how do u know that no-one would hire either of them, either the mechanic/mute radio person if they can do the job as good anyone else then its illegal to not give them the job because of their disability, its not silliness - its fact
You're really not getting the point of these hypothetical questions, are you?
Re: Disgusted
u mis understand reasonable adjustment, if by getting a co-commentator that the mute signs to enables the mute to do the job, then so be it, 'reasonable adjustment' is enshrined in law, so it doesnt matter what u think really, i accept that in practice it probably wouldnt workDarloOnTheUp wrote:AHA, so you think having a helper for a mute person on the radio is reasonable? I fucking don't.hodgie1 wrote:no, because thats not a reasonable adjustment, it would effect health and safety hence the wod 'reasonable'DL5 wrote:Maybe a blind bus driver could have a co pilot to tell him when to turn the corner, that would work, right?DarloOnTheUp wrote:Yes, but nobody would actually hire him.hodgie1 wrote:well, actually yes, as in theory he could sign then a speaking person could relay what the mute was saying, if a mute applied to commentate on footie, and proved that with the aid of a speaking person he could do the job, then the radio station couldnt not give him the job because hes a mute, its called 'reasonable adjustment' in law
How about THIS then? A no-armed mechanic? You've already taken this thread into ridiculous levels of silliness, so why not take it further?
-
- Posts: 172
- Joined: Tue Jul 21, 2009 10:30 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
- Location: Durham
Re: Disgusted
I tell you what next home game lets have a blind person doing the commentary on the game eh?
- DarloOnTheUp
- Posts: 6346
- Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2009 12:35 am
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: Disgusted
Bingo. I thank you and good night.hodgie1 wrote:i accept that in practice it probably wouldnt work
Re: Disgusted
They could pick almost anybody from the crowd.darloviper wrote:I tell you what next home game lets have a blind person doing the commentary on the game eh?
Re: Disgusted
Yes, but nobody would actually hire him.
How about THIS then? A no-armed mechanic? You've already taken this thread into ridiculous levels of silliness, so why not take it further?[/quote]
again, yes, in theory, he could know everything about mechanics there is to know, then he could pass on his knowledge - or he could get prosthetic arms fitted and probably do the job himself
how do u know that no-one would hire either of them, either the mechanic/mute radio person if they can do the job as good anyone else then its illegal to not give them the job because of their disability, its not silliness - its fact[/quote]
You're really not getting the point of these hypothetical questions, are you?[/quote]
yep, i believe i am[/quote]
Trust me, you're not. You're editing the conditions as you know I'm right and can't force yourself to say "no, I wouldn't hire a no-armed mechanic". Hypothetical questions can't be fucking edited by a third-party. You need to answer them as they are as they aren't real situations.[/quote]
i saw a one armed person fix a car, remember, that was real
How about THIS then? A no-armed mechanic? You've already taken this thread into ridiculous levels of silliness, so why not take it further?[/quote]
again, yes, in theory, he could know everything about mechanics there is to know, then he could pass on his knowledge - or he could get prosthetic arms fitted and probably do the job himself
how do u know that no-one would hire either of them, either the mechanic/mute radio person if they can do the job as good anyone else then its illegal to not give them the job because of their disability, its not silliness - its fact[/quote]
You're really not getting the point of these hypothetical questions, are you?[/quote]
yep, i believe i am[/quote]
Trust me, you're not. You're editing the conditions as you know I'm right and can't force yourself to say "no, I wouldn't hire a no-armed mechanic". Hypothetical questions can't be fucking edited by a third-party. You need to answer them as they are as they aren't real situations.[/quote]
i saw a one armed person fix a car, remember, that was real
Re: Disgusted
Quakerz wrote:Spineless?Darlo_Rob wrote:Eh? Further my agenda, what agenda? I'm highlighting what some posters typed in the match thread and I asked for an apology in the first post of this thread. If that wasn't forthcoming then I suggested a ban.
You trying to justify your actions is spineless.
Take a step away from the constant "he must be banned", "he's a bully/outrage/scumbag" rhetoric first of all because you are doing exactly what you are accusing me of...
Then, once you do that, explain to me how sticking to my guns and refusing to cave in to you is "spineless"?
In no way am I abusing you. I've made a reasoned argument to some posts on another thread. You've tried to justify your actions, I don't believe you.
Thanks.
Re: Disgusted
I think he'll be too busy refereeing, in all honesty.darloviper wrote:I tell you what next home game lets have a blind person doing the commentary on the game eh?
- DarloOnTheUp
- Posts: 6346
- Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2009 12:35 am
- Team Supported: Darlington
Re: Disgusted
Have you ever seen a no-armed person fix a car? No, so STFU.hodgie1 wrote:
i saw a one armed person fix a car, remember, that was real
Excuse me, I need to go bang my head against the wall repeatedly.
Re: Disgusted
nah, that wouldnt work, loldarloviper wrote:I tell you what next home game lets have a blind person doing the commentary on the game eh?
-
- Posts: 172
- Joined: Tue Jul 21, 2009 10:30 pm
- Team Supported: Darlington
- Location: Durham
Re: Disgusted
hodgie1 wrote:nah, that wouldnt work, loldarloviper wrote:I tell you what next home game lets have a blind person doing the commentary on the game eh?
precisely lol, what a stupid thread this has turned into