Martin Gray

Open now for discussion of all things Darlo!

Moderators: mikkyx, uncovered

onewayup
Posts: 2873
Joined: Fri Jul 31, 2009 6:02 pm
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Martin Gray

Post by onewayup » Mon Feb 07, 2022 3:50 pm

MG could have sent us out of business with his spend spend attitude to gaining his ambitions,
AA knows how we work as a fan owned club.

quakersfan
Posts: 491
Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2018 2:26 pm
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Martin Gray

Post by quakersfan » Mon Feb 07, 2022 10:05 pm

CrazyDarlo wrote:
Mon Feb 07, 2022 1:43 pm
I’ve never understood why MG is blamed for overspending, isn’t it the boards job to not allow him to do so?
I think people forget that Martin Jesper left without to much notice followed by Dave Mills on even sorter notice at the time when the club had to move out of Bishop otherwise we would have been demoted. Tempest chair of the SG stepped up which I doubt he wanted to do. The immediate thing to sort out was the deal to move to Blackwell and the dire relationship withe RC in respect to the licence. Richard Cook joined to help with that and it became quickly clear it would cost much more money than planned . Then came seat gate and the infamous forum where Gray was probably quite rightly pissed off and tried to bring move investment in and apparently there were more investors out there. Cook resigned along with Jowett leaving Tempest the sole director he then invited David Johnson to steady the ship and join the main board which IMO the best appointment the club has made. Since then the DFCSG board has grown much stronger providing additional help to the board in lots of areas whereas previously you had 1-2 people trying to cover aspect of the club.
From Jesper to the present day it hasn’t been easy I’d imagine for any of them and must have been stressful but with a larger board there are now more people to carry the load and it shows.

User avatar
Makka Pakka
Posts: 1302
Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2009 11:27 am
Team Supported: Darlington
Location: Newton Aycliffe

Re: Martin Gray

Post by Makka Pakka » Tue Feb 08, 2022 8:52 am

quakersfan wrote:
Mon Feb 07, 2022 10:05 pm
the club had to move out of Bishop otherwise we would have been demoted.
Is that correct? I don't remember that.
"At a meeting held at the Grammar School on Friday last - Mr Phillip Wood M.A., in the chair - it was resolved to form an Association Football Club for Darlington and neighbourhood. The opinions of those present were so unanimous as to the desirability of this step, that a committee was formed to complete the organisation of the club, and Mr Craven, 17, Garden Street, was appointed secretary pro tem." - The Northern Echo, Monday 23rd July 1883

JE93
Posts: 1875
Joined: Sun Nov 29, 2009 2:48 pm
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Martin Gray

Post by JE93 » Tue Feb 08, 2022 9:19 am

Makka Pakka wrote:
Tue Feb 08, 2022 8:52 am
quakersfan wrote:
Mon Feb 07, 2022 10:05 pm
the club had to move out of Bishop otherwise we would have been demoted.
Is that correct? I don't remember that.
I think that is correct. Ground grading level B is what's required for NLN and NLS, which I think meant Bishop failed on the following grading requirements:
- 3000 capacity with ability to increase 4000
- 6 turnstiles

Bishop only had 4 turnstiles and a capacity of 2,000.

lo36789
Posts: 10993
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2011 10:58 pm
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Martin Gray

Post by lo36789 » Tue Feb 08, 2022 11:22 am

Makka Pakka wrote:
Tue Feb 08, 2022 8:52 am
quakersfan wrote:
Mon Feb 07, 2022 10:05 pm
the club had to move out of Bishop otherwise we would have been demoted.
Is that correct? I don't remember that.
Yes if we had until March that season to meet ground grading for National League North.

H1987
Posts: 2108
Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2016 4:14 pm
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Martin Gray

Post by H1987 » Tue Feb 08, 2022 5:19 pm

I think all bridges have been burned and I back AA, but I certainly don’t think Gray would do a worse job right now. I think AA is a good manager too so I hope he can turn things around. Agreed with whoever it was above who pointed out TW is a much worse option than both.

If AA went, I wouldn’t be *as* against Gray as many others clearly would. I don’t accept this is our level like some seem to. We can get up to and compete in the league above. I do, however, acknowledge that the football league is a pipe dream without a major investor coming out of nowhere.

Darlobill
Posts: 318
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2021 6:00 am
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Martin Gray

Post by Darlobill » Tue Feb 08, 2022 7:37 pm

TW brought a lot of money in with transfers when he was asked to sell players I don’t think MG or AA have come close on that level.
Hate or loathe him Singh has done a good job at Pools on and off the pitch, however football is also about a strong wind and bucket loads of luck. Roll on Saturday.

JE93
Posts: 1875
Joined: Sun Nov 29, 2009 2:48 pm
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Martin Gray

Post by JE93 » Tue Feb 08, 2022 8:22 pm

Darlobill wrote:
Tue Feb 08, 2022 7:37 pm
TW brought a lot of money in with transfers when he was asked to sell players I don’t think MG or AA have come close on that level.
Hate or loathe him Singh has done a good job at Pools on and off the pitch, however football is also about a strong wind and bucket loads of luck. Roll on Saturday.
I don't know if the gap between AA and TW is really that large in terms of transfer income you can actually attribute to them. eg, signed the player, played them and then sold them on.

MG brought in basically nothing but that was largely because he was going after experienced players for the level we were at who would have little in the way of sell on value.

TW, I'm not sure you can really claim the Ferguson, Beck & Bartlett (probably c.£40k for the lot) sales were down to him. All three were players signed for Darlo by Gray and 2/3 of them were signed by Gray for York. It would have been 3/3 had York been willing to complete the Beck deal without a medical as he was injured at the time. That leaves him with Heaton and Saunders, both were Martin Gray identified / signings but credit to Tommy he is the one who played them and got them noticed so he deserves credit there. While the headline price on the Heaton deal (£75k) sounded good. DJ came to say that we only got about half in the end largely because Heaton flopped north of the boarder, barely made an appearance and was released after a year. So by the time you add in the Saunders deal I'd be surprised if Tommy made much more than £55k out of those two signings.

AA has developed and sold Donawa and Charman which probably has brought in £55k or so which is similar to what Wright achieved from players he developed.

As for Singh doing a good job, that would depend how you classify that. He has done good things, he appointed Dave Challinor as manager and this season he's gotten them a decent cup run, but he's also made poor decisions, alienating Dave Challinor and continuing to put money into Pools via loans. All in all the way I look at pools and Singh is that they are £x million in debt to Clarence House and I would never trust him to not wake up one day and demand it back at which point without a white knight, Pools are goosed.

shildonlad
Posts: 983
Joined: Mon May 07, 2012 9:53 pm
Team Supported: Newcastle united and gateshead
Location: Chesterfield

Re: Martin Gray

Post by shildonlad » Tue Feb 08, 2022 9:05 pm

JE93 wrote:
Tue Feb 08, 2022 8:22 pm
Darlobill wrote:
Tue Feb 08, 2022 7:37 pm
TW brought a lot of money in with transfers when he was asked to sell players I don’t think MG or AA have come close on that level.
Hate or loathe him Singh has done a good job at Pools on and off the pitch, however football is also about a strong wind and bucket loads of luck. Roll on Saturday.
I don't know if the gap between AA and TW is really that large in terms of transfer income you can actually attribute to them. eg, signed the player, played them and then sold them on.

MG brought in basically nothing but that was largely because he was going after experienced players for the level we were at who would have little in the way of sell on value.

TW, I'm not sure you can really claim the Ferguson, Beck & Bartlett (probably c.£40k for the lot) sales were down to him. All three were players signed for Darlo by Gray and 2/3 of them were signed by Gray for York. It would have been 3/3 had York been willing to complete the Beck deal without a medical as he was injured at the time. That leaves him with Heaton and Saunders, both were Martin Gray identified / signings but credit to Tommy he is the one who played them and got them noticed so he deserves credit there. While the headline price on the Heaton deal (£75k) sounded good. DJ came to say that we only got about half in the end largely because Heaton flopped north of the boarder, barely made an appearance and was released after a year. So by the time you add in the Saunders deal I'd be surprised if Tommy made much more than £55k out of those two signings.

AA has developed and sold Donawa and Charman which probably has brought in £55k or so which is similar to what Wright achieved from players he developed.

As for Singh doing a good job, that would depend how you classify that. He has done good things, he appointed Dave Challinor as manager and this season he's gotten them a decent cup run, but he's also made poor decisions, alienating Dave Challinor and continuing to put money into Pools via loans. All in all the way I look at pools and Singh is that they are £x million in debt to Clarence House and I would never trust him to not wake up one day and demand it back at which point without a white knight, Pools are goosed.
Singh got pools back into the league though so more chance of other investors coming on board or even selling the club. I bet pools fans would have been worried if they were still in national league. I think hes made a good call on graeme lee
I may not live in the north east anymore but i still support the north east teams

shildonlad
Posts: 983
Joined: Mon May 07, 2012 9:53 pm
Team Supported: Newcastle united and gateshead
Location: Chesterfield

Re: Martin Gray

Post by shildonlad » Tue Feb 08, 2022 9:07 pm

Darlobill wrote:
Tue Feb 08, 2022 7:37 pm
TW brought a lot of money in with transfers when he was asked to sell players I don’t think MG or AA have come close on that level.
Hate or loathe him Singh has done a good job at Pools on and off the pitch, however football is also about a strong wind and bucket loads of luck. Roll on Saturday.
Without singh pools would have gone bust, not setting league 2 on fire but plenty get by at that level been bottom half
I may not live in the north east anymore but i still support the north east teams

AndyPark
Posts: 12155
Joined: Sat Jul 25, 2009 3:08 pm
Team Supported: Darlington
Location: Darlington

Re: Martin Gray

Post by AndyPark » Tue Feb 08, 2022 10:28 pm

You wanna take your tongue out of Singh’s arse?

The man is a tool and one day, he’ll f*ck Pools over like did us.

H1987
Posts: 2108
Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2016 4:14 pm
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Martin Gray

Post by H1987 » Wed Feb 09, 2022 10:05 am

Maybe, but the fact of the matter is that as they’re now back in the football league, they are more likely to attract a buyer if he does.

Santino
Posts: 1477
Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2009 12:44 am
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Martin Gray

Post by Santino » Wed Feb 09, 2022 10:55 am

We are in a bit of a holding pattern whilst the work behind the scenes continues with the new ground etc. DJ said on the webinar last week that achieving promotion would be expensive for us, although we'd make it work. We all want a winning team on the pitch but the long term infrastructure must take precedent. Alun is well equipped to work under those conditions. Martin Gray achieved a lot for us but he wanted everything right here, right now (which is fair enough, his prerogative).

His bucket rattling comments also reflect very poorly on him and his understanding of who we are as a club. Some of our fans seem to constantly be chasing the next Messiah, it's time to get behind the people working hard to progress the club sustainably.

onewayup
Posts: 2873
Joined: Fri Jul 31, 2009 6:02 pm
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Martin Gray

Post by onewayup » Wed Feb 09, 2022 11:45 am

Santino,I totally agree,
Stick with it we have time and it will take that time to build a strong base for the strengthening of a very stable club able to move up the league ladder ,things are being put in place to safe guard the club from becoming insolvent future proofing as best you can. That's got to be good.

User avatar
loan_star
Posts: 7141
Joined: Thu Jul 16, 2009 9:01 am
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Martin Gray

Post by loan_star » Wed Feb 09, 2022 12:29 pm

H1987 wrote:
Wed Feb 09, 2022 10:05 am
Maybe, but the fact of the matter is that as they’re now back in the football league, they are more likely to attract a buyer if he does.
Like Bury? Like Derby? If a club is a basket case then I think they are going to find it far harder these days to find the magical investor while they dont own the ground they are playing in.

H1987
Posts: 2108
Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2016 4:14 pm
Team Supported: Darlington

Re: Martin Gray

Post by H1987 » Thu Feb 10, 2022 9:11 am

loan_star wrote:
Wed Feb 09, 2022 12:29 pm
H1987 wrote:
Wed Feb 09, 2022 10:05 am
Maybe, but the fact of the matter is that as they’re now back in the football league, they are more likely to attract a buyer if he does.
Like Bury? Like Derby? If a club is a basket case then I think they are going to find it far harder these days to find the magical investor while they dont own the ground they are playing in.
I said more likely, I didn't say it was a certainty. (I'm fairly sure someone will buy Derby, there's just some brinkmanship going on at the moment. Not fun for the fans though).

Post Reply